Robin Webb on Animal Rights Terrorism

No Compromise recently ran a telling interview with Animal Liberation Front press officer Robin web about the roll of terrorism in the animal rights movement. Webb told the magazine (emphasis added),

The Animal Liberation Front, together with more radical groups such as the Animal Rights Militia and Justice Department, is the hard cutting edge of the war against abuse and exploitation of the weak and innocent, irrespective of gender, race or species.

. . .

The third policy is to take every reasonable precaution not to harm or endanger life, either human or non-human.

Anyone, so long as they follow at least a vegetarian—but preferably vegan—lifestyle, can go out and undertake an action that falls within those policies and claim it as the Animal Liberation Front. There is no hierarchy; there are no leaders. There is just a compulsion to follow your heart in pursuit of justice. That is why the A.L.F. cannot be smashed, it cannot be effectively infiltrated, it cannot be stopped. You, each and every one of you: you are the A.L.F.

And if someone wishes to act as the Animal Rights Militia or the Justice Department? Simply put, the third policy of the A.L.F. no longer applies.

As this web site has repeatedly said, it is incorrect to think of the ALF, ARM and Justice Department as groups. Instead they are little more than brand names for specific actions that are likely taken by overlapping group of activists.

Burn down a laboratory and nobody is injured? Claim it in the name of the ALF. Want to send razor blades to the homes of medical researchers? Fine, just make sure you label it as a Justice Department action.

Instead of thinking of these groups out there organizing to carry out activities, animal rights terrorism and extremism is better conceived as, in general, small groups of extremists who pick and choose a la carte from these brands depending on the outcome of their activities. There is no ALF dedicated to not harming people as opposed to an ARM that has no problem composing assassination lists. Instead there is simply a hardcore of animal rights extremism that picks and chooses these names for their own purposes.

In fact Webb and activist David Hammond were arrested in 1994 and charged with possession of a sawed-off shotgun. Later Hammond and Webb had a falling out, and The Observer reported in 1998 that,

Earlier, ALF defector David Hammond claimed Webb was the secret force behind the pro-killing group, the Justice Department. He said the outwardly respectable ALF spokesman had even offered him a sawn-off shotgun in a Sussex lay-by and asked if he knew Colin Blakemore – an Oxford professor who is at the top of the Justice Department’s hit-list.

Source:

Staying on target and going the distance: an interview with UK ALF Press Officer Robin Webb. No Compromise, Issue 22, Fall 2003.

In Defense of Animals Starts Letter Campaign Against Proposed Pro-Trapping Postage Stamp

On December 8, 2003, In Defense of Animals included this item in its weekly newsletter,

A pro-trapping postage stamp is currently under consideration by the U.S. Postal Service. The National Trappers Association (NTA) is pushing the stamp and if they go forward with their campaign to institute the pro-trapping stamp, the trappers will inundate the USPS with vocal requests for these stamps.

Each year approximately 10 million animals are trapped in the wild, so that they can be skinned for fur coats. The primary tools used by fur trappers are the following: leghold trap, the body grip (Conibear) trap, and the wire snare. Volumes of documentation proving that leghold traps mutilate wild animals, are non-selective in what they catch, and are a danger to companion animals and children.This is not something to be promoted on a stamp. Learn more about trapping here.

Contact the national Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee and ask it to deny any pro-trapping stamp requested by the NTA. Tell the Committee that the USPS should not promote animal cruelty.

But a couple weeks later, New Jersey Animal Rights Alliance activist Joe Miele posted a copy of a letter he had received from the USPS dated November 4, 2003, denying that the postal service had plans for a trapping stamp,

November 4, 2003

Dear Mr. Miele:

Thank you for your October 24 letters expressing your opposition to the
issuance of a stamp honoring trappers and animal trapping.

There are no plans to issue such a stamp as part of the annual stamp
program.

Each year the Postal Service receives thousands of letters suggesting
hundreds of different topics for new stamps. The Citizens’ Stamp Advisory
Committee was established in 1957 to review all suggestions and make
recommendations to the Postmaster General. Committee recommendations are
based on national interest, historical perspective, and other criteria. We
rely on the Committee to produce a balanced stamp program that touches on
all aspects of our heritage. Enclosed for your reference is the Creating
U.S. Postage Stamps brochure.

We appreciate your interest in our stamp program.

Sincerely,

Terrence W. McCaffrey
Manager
Stamp Development

If IDA wants to keep activists busy on a wild goose chase, more power to them.

Sources:

Trappers push pro-trapping postage stamp. Animal News Center, December 22, 2003.

E-Newsletter. In Defense of Animals, December 8, 2003.

USPS correspondence. Terrence W. McCaffrey, November 4, 2003.

School Official Admits Planting Drugs in Student’s Locker

What is the deal with overzealous school officials when it comes to drugs? First there was that video of the cops with guns drawn in a southern high school, and now there’s this story on the front page of my local paper today,

An assistant high school principal is being investigated after police say he admitted to planting marijuana in a student’s locker.

Police say Pat Conroy told them earlier this month that he placed the marijuana in the male student’s locker at South Haven High School last year because he suspected the student was a drug dealer. Conroy told police he was trying to get the boy expelled.

But the plan failed because a police drug dog didn’t find the contraband during a school search, The Herald-Palladium of St. Joseph reported in a Friday story.

Sounds like the students had more to fear from the criminals in the administration office than from the alleged criminals in their midst.

Source:

Assistant principal admits planting marijuana in student’s locker Associated Press, February 20, 2004.

February 1, 2004 Anti-War Protest

Below are images from a protest by the |Kalamazoo Non-Violent Opponents to War|
held in downtown Kalamazoo on February 1, 2004:

I count about 25 people there when I showed up about 12:30 p.m. Not a bad turnout
for a cold Michigan winter day.

“522 dead for Haliburton.” Hmm, where have I seen that sign before?
I’m still wondering how that guy back in December was counting — maybe he was
using some fractional-based numbering system.

I don’t think you’ll ever be able to end violence, but the war in Iraq was
one giant step toward diminishing it overall in the Middle East.

War is not terrorism.

It’s hard to read in this picture, but the sign on the lower right says “No
to Israel’s Apartheid Wall.”

Some of the anti-Israeli left think that the wall Israel is building to separate
itself from Palestinian areas could be used to turn the tide of public opinion
here against Israel. I doubt this issue could ever really resonate with most
Americans, especially given Israel’s understandable need to thwart terrorist
acts against its citizens.

It’s interesting that for all the “End Violence” and “Live Dr.
King’s Dream” signs you see at these rallies, you never see anything specifically
condemning Palestinian acts of terrorism. Israel’s wall is “apartheid,”
but apparently they can’t be bothered to express an opinon about suicide bombers
targeting busses.

Here we have two winners. First, “Pre-emptive war on Iraq will
has fueled terrorism!” Huh? Where?

Next to that one we have “War is wrong whatever the outcome.” Ah
yes, Gandhi’s philosophical heirs. At least they’re honest enough to put the
central tenet of pacifism for everyone to see it’s absurdity.

Archos Gmini 220

I am a total sucker for gadgets like the Archos Gmini 220 (what a horrible product title).

Okay, it’s your basic 20 gb MP3 player. But wait, there’s more. Add an attachment and it becomes an FM radio as well, and you can record directly to the HD. But there’s still more — add an external microphone and capture lectures and presentations.

Not enough? Transfer and store files from all major flash memory cards onto the HD — great for temporarily storing digital photographs on the road to free up that expensive flash memory.

The unit can display the photos, but only in monochrome. I’m only interested in storing them not viewing them, so that’s not a big issue for me, but might be for others.

And the price is a rather respectable $350. I think I’m in love.

Denver City Council Hears Debate Over Ballot Initiative to Ban Circus Animals

At its January 12 meeting the Denver City Council heard speakers on both sides of a ballot initiative aimed at banning circus animals within city limits. That initiative will be put before voters in August.

The initiative is the brain child of 15-year-old Heather Herman, who formed a group called Youth Opposed to Animal Acts to ban circus animals from the city. Herman told TheDenverChannel.Com,

I’ve always cared about animals and just thought of them traveling in smaller cages and I just always thought that was wrong.

Denver is a bit famous (or infamous depending on our point of view) for its ballot initiatives. Denver voters recently voted down, for example, a ballot initiative that would have required the city council to reduce the level of stress in the city. Although Denver has a population topping half a million, only 6,000 signatures are required to put an initiative before voters.

Herman was aided in gathering the signatures by animal rights activist Tamara Lackey and her group, Political Voice for Animals. Lackey told the Rocky Mountain News,

I was completely impressed with her [Herman] — just how totally unselfish she is, and caring, and that she would give so much of her time at the age of 13 and 14 to work for animals. I just find her extremely impressive. She really is the force behind all this. . . . I was not something we would have ever pursued on our own. She was definitely the impetus for us.

Ringling Bros. is the circus that would be impacted the most by the ban, and it is actively campaigning against the proposed ban. Ringling Brothers’ Cassie Folk told TheDenverChannel.Com,

This proposed ban is a solution in search of a problem as the vast majority of circus animals are well cared for and pose no danger. Enacting the ordinance would deny the people of Denver the opportunity to choose what type of entertainment they will and will not attend. Attending the circus, or the rodeo or stock show, like the choice of what kind of food to eat or clothes to wear, is a personal choice, and not one that should be determined by city ordinances.

Ringling Bros., along other circuses and zoos, is subject to stringent animal welfare regulations under the Animal Welfare Act. The U.S. Department of Agriculture conducts regular unannounced inspections of our animals and the animal compound, and in the 30 years under current ownership, Ringling Bros. has never been found in violation for abuse, neglect or mistreatment of our animals. In fact, in all aspects of animal care and safety, Ringling Bros. meets or exceeds all federal animal welfare standards. In addition, Ringling Bros. must and does comply with numerous state and local animal welfare regulations.

The Rocky Mountain News cited the California animal abuse prosecution of Ringling Bros. Mark Olivier Gebel as an example of how activists put forth animal abuse claims against circuses that appear strong but fall apart on closer examination. As the Rocky Mountain News put it,

Complaints were brought by an officer with the Santa Clara County Humane Society, which has police powers, and a San Jose policewoman, but during the trial the two failed to convince the jury they had actually seen any abuse. The prosecution’s case was so weak that Gebel’s lawyers didn’t even offer a defense, and the jury voted unanimously to acquit him. Gebel’s victory never got the same attention the accusations did . . .

Those opposed to the initiative also point out that the circus brings as much as $8 million a year to Denver — more than 250,000 people have seen Ringling Bros. in Denver over the past couple years — and if the initiative passes both Ringling Bros. and that $8 million will simply relocate to a nearby location.

Beyond whether or not circuses are cruel, there is a very curious provision to the Youth Opposed to Animal Acts proposed ban on performing animals — it includes a number of exemptions to protect a number of other Denver-area animal acts. Here’s the section of the initiative that explicitly bans animal acts, followed immediately by a whole host of exemptions,

It shall be unlawful for any person to put on or sponsor a wild or exotic animal display on any public or private land within the City and County of Denver. This prohibition, however, shall not apply to the Denver Zoological Gardens (The Denver Zoo), The Denver Downtown Aquarium (Ocean Journey) subject to accreditation as set forth below, The National Western Stock Show, or any entity accredited by the American Zoo and Aquarium Association, the Association of Sanctuaries or the American Sanctuary Association, or their successors.

The National Western Stock Show is a rodeo. Ah yes, yet another set of activists with the courage of their convictions.

The full text of the ballot initiative can be read here.

Sources:

Denver Initiative To Ban Circus Up For Debate. TheDenverChannel.Com, January 12, 2004.

Circus tries to tame fight over exotic animals. Mark Couch, Denver Post, January 2004.

Teen tosses animal-abuse claim into wrong ring. Bill Johnson, Rocky Mountain News, January 14, 2004.

Don’t ban circuses from Denver; Allegations of abuse turn out to be flimsy. Rocky Mountain News, January 14, 2004.