United Nations Revises Population Estimates Slightly Upward

The United Nations recently released an updated version of its population projections through 2050 which slightly increased the expected population for its low, medium and high scenarios. Its new projects would have world population reaching almost 7.9 billion by 2050 under the low projection, 9.3 billion under the medium variant, and 10.9 billion under its high variant. Each scenario represents a drastic break in population growth — if current population growth rates were to remain constant, the world’s population would top 13 billion in 2050.

Why the upward revision of a few hundred million people? Primarily because previous projections underestimated birth rates in India, Nigeria, Bangladesh and other regions.

There are a number of interesting implications in the report. Except for the United States, population growth is no longer an issue for Western industrialized nations. Rather than worrying about their population growing, nations from Great Britain to Italy to Japan will have to grapple with the fact that their populations will decline, in some cases substantially, by 2050 if the UN projections turn out to be correct.

Meanwhile the developing world’s population will continue to explode — the number of people living in the 48 poorest nations of the world will see their population triple by 2050 (which is an interesting counterfactual to the common claim that all populations, even human populations, inevitably grow when they have surplus resources).

While Western industrial nations will see their population decline, they will also see their population age as the number of people over 60 and 80 years of age grows rapidly. The median age for people living in Africa, for example, will be about 27.4 by 2050, whereas in North America it will reach 41 and in Europe it will reach an astounding 49.5.

The United States is the oddball nation within Western industrial countries since although its population will age, it will also continue to grow to close to 400 million people by 2050. Some of that growth is due to the United States’ relatively liberal immigration policies, but as Nicholas Eberstadt points out, even if you leave the immigration issue aside, America’s birth rates are significantly hire than birth rates of demographically similar European nations.

ALthough AIDS will continue to afflict the developing world, killing tens of millions of people by 2050, the epidemic in Africa and elsewhere won’t be able to slow population growth anywhere except perhaps subSaharan Africa. In fact nations that have some of the highest AIDS infection rates in the world, such as Botswana and Zimbabwe, will see their populations soar thanks to very high fertility rates.

‘Nine billion people by 2050’. The BBC, February 28, 2001

Against a trend, U.S. population will bloom, U.N. says. Barbara Crossette, The New York Times, February 28, 2001.

World confronts an aging population. John Dillin, The Christian Science Monitor, March 1, 2001.

Celera Wins Grant to Decode Rat Genome

Following its successes with decoding the genomes of humans, mice and flies, Celera Genomics recently announced it had been awarded a $58 million National Institutes Health grant, along with the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, to sequence the DNA of rats. Since rats are widely used in medical experiments already, the rat genome could provide a lot of clues to understanding human and animal diseases.

The rat’s genome is believed to be about the same size as that of human beings. Rats are preferred over mice in medical research because, among other things, they have larger bodies which make it easier to study models of human diseases.

Celera’s Craig Venter told The BBC, “WE believe that by pooling our resources [with the Baylor College of Medicine] we can quickly unlock the mysteries of this important model organism which should aid researchers in their quest for a better understanding of basic human biology and health, and thus to find improved cures and treatments for disease.”

Source:

Rat genome is next. The BBC, March 1, 2001.

Even Conservative Women Find “The Surrendered Wife” Nauseating

I expected all of the liberal pundits to deplore The Surrendered Wife, but WorldNetDaily.Com’s Cynthia Grenier managed a pretty good dissection of the book in a recent column. Writing that, “I just about gagged as I began reading all these stories in the press about a new manual for women: ‘The Surrendered Wife’…”

Grenier reports that the book has sold about 100,000 copies, and you have to wonder about the sort of women (and men) who would find the book’s advice relevant to their lives. Taking her cue from author Laura Doyle’s suggestion that women should never attempt to correct men’s driving directions even if they miss the correct off-ramp on a highway and end up driving many miles out of their way, Grenier writes,

I can only wonder what in Heaven’s name any half way intelligent male would think on being allowed to drive miles and hours out of his way just to maintain his strong, manly image.

Grenier concludes her column with advice that applies equally well to men as well as women. “My advice: ‘Soften, yes; surrender, never.'” Now there’s some decent relationship advice.

Source:

What to do about the American wife?. Cynthia Grenier, WorldNetDaily, March 3, 2001.

Judith Kleinfeld On the MIT Gender Discrimination Study

Judith Kleinfeld recently wrote a column for The Christian Science Monitor summarizing her views and the recent Independent Women’s Forum study of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s sexual discrimination study.

MIT’s study claimed that the university had discriminated against female scientists, but on closer analysis the study was a political document devoid of any statistics or solid facts that would allow anyone to examine whether or not there had indeed been sex discrimination at MIT. As Kleinfeld writes,

Did MIT actually discriminate against its female faculty? Check out the study yourself at MIT’s web site (http://web.mit.edu/). You will notice an astonishing fact: MIT’s study is innocent of evidence of gender discrimination. Not an iota of data is offered to show that MIT treated its female faculty any differently from its male faculty.

Irrational self-flagellation — it’s not just for medieval monks anymore.

Source:

False solution on gender. Judith Kleinfeld, The Christian Science Monitor, February 27, 2001.

Police Make Arrests in UK Letter Bomb Campaign

Police in the United Kingdom recently made several arrests as part of their investigation into a series of letter bombs mailed to animal-related enterprises. A police spokesman said they had arrested a 26-year-old man, a 36-year-old man, and a 31-year-old woman as part of their investigation.

Police also managed to recover three bombs that had been prepared and were about to be sent to animal enterprises in the UK. The bombs were recovered and rendered inoperable by bomb disposal experts.

In all 11 business were targeted by the bombs which were packed with explosives and nails designed to cause injury to anyone opening the letters. Only five of the devices actually detonated, but three of those explosions resulted in serious injuries.

A six-year-old girl suffered leg wounds on New Year’s Eve from a bomb sent to her father. He was apparently targeted because he owns a pest control service. A farmer suffered facial injuries after he opened one of the bombs as well. The most serious injury, however, was to a female employee of an estate agency who suffered facial injuries that caused serious damage to one of her eyes.

Hopefully police have discovered all those responsible and a dangerous terrorist cell has been taken out of circulation.

Sources:

Police arrest three after letter-bomb campaign. Andrew Walker, The Scotsman, February 22, 2001.

Suspects arrested in letter-bomb case. Maria Breslin, The Independent (London), February 22, 2001.

Three held by letter bomb police. Mary O’Hara, The Guardian (London), February 22, 2001

Protests In Texas Against Private School Scholarships

An example of just how heated and bizarre attitudes about vouchers are was evident at a recent protest in Austin, Texas, decrying scholarships for private schools. What made the protest bizarre is that the scholarships that were being protested are financed completely by private funds.

Dr. James Leininger of San Antonio used $45 million of his own money to finance the CEO Horizon Scholarship Program in San Antonio. The program gives money to students who live in the low-income Edgewood School District.

According to the Associated Press about 800 to 1,100 students have participated in the program, though not all of those students have been accepted by private schools.

This is a horrifying development to some in Edgewood, especially teachers unions. Diana Herrera, president of the Edgewood Classroom Teachers Association, summed up the anti-voucher argument quite well saying, “I don’t care if the words are going to be tax credit, opportunity scholarship, parental choice. Vouchers by any name will not be accepted.” Parents will simply accept the state school of their choice and learn to like it — even if their kids don’t learn much else.

Edgewood Superintendent Noe Sauceda complained that the students who took the CEO Foundation scholarships took $2 to $4 million annually away from the district since state funding is predicated on student enrollment.

But as Mary Havel of the CEO Foundation pointed out, if there are fewer students then presumably the school district’s expenses should also be lower (which is why funding is linked to student enrollment in the first place).

Leininger and The CEO Foundation should be saluted for doing their best to help poor students route around the damaged stated educational system in Texas.

Source:

Voucher foes rally at Capitol. The Associated Press, February 22, 2001.