Can Oil Companies Just Make Oil?

Somebody recently posted a message repeating a common refrain about natural resources, in this case oil. It doesn’t matter how much oil is actually out there since the total has to be finite. Oil companies don’t just make oil after all. Well, actually they can.

Most people dramatically underestimate the amount of existing oil as well as the number of nontraditional ways that oil can be extracted from the planet. Often what seems like a pipe dream today turns out to be an enormous source of oil tomorrow.

A good example of that is the Athabasca oil sands in Alberta, Canada. Discovered in the 18th century, essentially what you have is a huge area of sand saturated with oil. Of course oil mixed in with sand can hardly be refined very easily.

But, in fact, a method for separating the sand from the oil was developed as far back as the 1920s. The problem? With cheap oil prices, the process is just too expensive to bother with. Today, however, the price of the process has declined enough and the price of oil has risen enough to make separating the oil from the sand cost effective. The New York Times recently reported that with development currently under way the amount of oil extracted from the oil sands could top one million barrels a day by 2006 — more oil than comes from Alaska’s North slope. By 2010 the area could potentially produce more than two billion barrels a day.

And just how much oil is recoverable from the oil sands? The total reserves are estimated at 300 billion barrels.

Getting oil from the oil sands is hardly the only method of extracting large amounts of oil that is available but expensive. There are vast deposits of oil around the world that simply aren’t included in oil reserve estimates not because they can’t be extracted, but rather because extraction would cost too much given today’s oil prices (most estimates of oil reserves give proven or estimated oil reserves at specific price points for a barrel of oil).

But doesn’t that dodge the point that there are an ultimately finite number of barrels of oil that can be extracted. Sure, but only in the sense that the universe itself probably contains a finite number of atoms and energy and must run down at some point too.

Are you worried about the ultimate death of the universe? I’m not, for the same reason I’m not worried about ultimately running out of oil. Even assuming no technological improvements in extracting oil, the world has more than enough oil such that we will have abandoned fossil fuels for a variety of reasons long before we come close to exhausting the world’s supply of oil. There are simply too many viable alternative energy sources to fossil fuels — many of which are not exploited largely because oil remains so cheap (despite what some people seem to think, fossil fuels are still incredibly cheap sources of energy).

Eventually either technological advances will drive the price of these alternatives below the price of oil or gradual long-term rise in oil prices will spur more research and development of these alternatives. Either way, although there will still be plenty of oil left at the end of our century to power the world’s economy, it is very likely that by that point it won’t matter since we will be well on the way to obtaining energy from alternative sources.

Source:

Digging for Oil. James Brooke, The New York Times, January 23, 2001.

India Leather Exports Surge; PETA Threatens Renewed Protests

According to the The Times of India, exports of leather goods from India to the West continues to surge, approaching the $2 billion level in the most recent fiscal year. Mohd Hasham of India’s Council for Leather Exports told The Times,

The growth rate in the sector of leather and leather goods has gone up to 25 percent and could further rise to 31 percent. Though there has been a shortage of raw materials, the export figures are expected to go up to $2 billion from $1.59 billion from 1999-2000.

The announcement of the increase in exports coincided with an announcement by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals that it would renew its campaign against Indian leather goods if the Council for Leather Exports doesn’t keep its promise to “improve transport and slaughter methods by May 2001.”

PETA claims that the leather exporters have made no effort to improve the conditions of animals and promises a vigorous campaign if they don’t follow through. In it statement PETA said a new campaign against Indian leather would be “fueled by 12 months of bottled-up feelings and all the frustrations born of patience and hope that came to naught, that will make previous attempts to decry the Indian leather industry look like child’s play.”

Sources:

Leather exports to touch $2 billion. The Times of India, March 4, 2001.

US animal rights group to re-launch campaign against Indian leather. Agence-Frances Presse. March 6, 2001.

Will the Heather Mercer Case Help or Harm Women?

When Heather Mercer won a $2 million judgment from Duke University, it was hailed as an important victory for women’s athletics. Instead it will likely shut the door for women who want to follow in Mercer’s footsteps.

Mercer wanted to be a kicker for Duke’s football team. She was given a tryout by the coach, but since her range was about 35-yards in practice, while a Division I school needs someone who can kick 45-yard field goals during a game, her coach cut her.

Mercer sued and a jury agreed that she had been discriminated against based on her sex. So why isn’t this a clear victory for women?

Because of the provisions of Title IX as they apply to sports. Under Title IX, if a school doesn’t have a women’s team in a given sport it must allow women to try out for the men’s team, with one important exception — contact sports are exempt from this rule.

That’s right, the current law is that if you allow a woman to try out to be a kicker on the football team and then cut her, she could potentially sue the university for sex discrimination as Mercer did. If you just tell the woman point blank, sorry football is a contact sport and the university doesn’t allow women to try out for such teams, the student has no recourse whatsoever.

The federal appeals court that allowed Mercer’s case to go to trial explicitly upheld the contact sports exemption writing, “we hold that where a university has allowed a member of the opposite sex to try out for a single-sex team in a contact sport, the university is, contrary to the holding of the district court, subject to Title IX and therefore prohibited from discriminating against that individual on the basis of his or her sex.”

The obvious reaction from universities seeing what happened in the Duke case will be to institute policies, either written or informal, to refuse try outs to women who want to participate on a men’s contact sport team.

In the end, Mercer’s legal victory will end up diminishing rather than enhancing women’s sports opportunities.

Source:

Sidelined! Kimberly Schuld, The Women’s Quraterly, Winter 2001.

Mercer v. Duke University. United States Court Of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit, No. 99-1014, Decided: July 12, 1999.

New pseudo-TLDs

Newsbytes seems to think it’s debunking some of the claims made in recent stories about New.Net’s pseudo TLDs. In case you haven’t heard, New.Net is using a browser plug-in to make it appear as if it is offering new TLDs, so I could register carnell.shop, for example. In reality the domain name is really carnell.new.net, but the browser plug-in makes carnell.shop resolve to carnell.new.net.

Anyway, I thought the really interesting news was that Earthlink, Excite at Home and other large ISPs have reached agreements with New.Net to modify their DNS servers so that users of those ISPs don’t need the browser plug-in.

That’s always been the difficulty in getting alternatives to ICANN off the ground — what’s the point of registering whatever.web with AlterNic or whatever when every ISP out there is pointing to ICANN’s root servers. Hopefully New.Net can reach critical mass to really be adopted pretty much universally or else get enough of a foothold to force ICANN to clean up its act.

Even Conservative Women Find “The Surrendered Wife” Nauseating

I expected all of the liberal pundits to deplore The Surrendered Wife, but WorldNetDaily.Com’s Cynthia Grenier managed a pretty good dissection of the book in a recent column. Writing that, “I just about gagged as I began reading all these stories in the press about a new manual for women: ‘The Surrendered Wife’…”

Grenier reports that the book has sold about 100,000 copies, and you have to wonder about the sort of women (and men) who would find the book’s advice relevant to their lives. Taking her cue from author Laura Doyle’s suggestion that women should never attempt to correct men’s driving directions even if they miss the correct off-ramp on a highway and end up driving many miles out of their way, Grenier writes,

I can only wonder what in Heaven’s name any half way intelligent male would think on being allowed to drive miles and hours out of his way just to maintain his strong, manly image.

Grenier concludes her column with advice that applies equally well to men as well as women. “My advice: ‘Soften, yes; surrender, never.'” Now there’s some decent relationship advice.

Source:

What to do about the American wife?. Cynthia Grenier, WorldNetDaily, March 3, 2001.

Celera Wins Grant to Decode Rat Genome

Following its successes with decoding the genomes of humans, mice and flies, Celera Genomics recently announced it had been awarded a $58 million National Institutes Health grant, along with the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, to sequence the DNA of rats. Since rats are widely used in medical experiments already, the rat genome could provide a lot of clues to understanding human and animal diseases.

The rat’s genome is believed to be about the same size as that of human beings. Rats are preferred over mice in medical research because, among other things, they have larger bodies which make it easier to study models of human diseases.

Celera’s Craig Venter told The BBC, “WE believe that by pooling our resources [with the Baylor College of Medicine] we can quickly unlock the mysteries of this important model organism which should aid researchers in their quest for a better understanding of basic human biology and health, and thus to find improved cures and treatments for disease.”

Source:

Rat genome is next. The BBC, March 1, 2001.