HULK BLOG NOW

The Hulk apparently has a weblog.

There is a comic book store down the street that at one point was a house. The interior had been rennovated to make it into a shopping-style environment, but it still looked like a house from the outside. So a couple years ago they hired a construction firm to come in and take out a portion of the store and remodel the exterior to expand the space and get rid of the house-like image.

So of course with this big pile of rubble surrounding the store they went with the obvious explanation on their sign, “Hulk smash!”

Antiwar Protest Pics – July 13, 2003

Once again this Sunday I found myself in downtown Kalamazoo to photograph the
weekly antiwar protests. This time, however, I spent much of my time talking
with a woman is writing a book (more on that later) and so didn’t end up with
enough time to take the usual number of shots. As a result, many of these are
hard to see (there is actually quite a bit of traffic through this area at this
time of day so it’s a matter of waiting for lights to change, traffic to clear,
and then get close enough to take a decent shot without getting run over. Rinse,
wash, and repeat). As usual, though, you can download extremely hi-res versions
of all of these photos at the link given at the end of this article.

From left to right, starting with the woman holding the sign sidewsign sidewise
her sign reads “Bush/Cheney are guilty of using weapons of mass destruction.”

Next to her we have, “Violence begets violence,” which is an interesting
sentiment. Of course sometimes nonviolence begets violence as well. Not quite
sure what the point is there.

Continuing left we have a sign reading “Peace and Justice for the Palestinians.”
There are usually two or three Palestinian-related signs in the crowd every
Sunday, and who could blame them — an undemocratic state without a free press
that encourages terrorism vs. one of the rare legitimate democracies in the
Middle East. You know where the Left is going to come down in that debate.

Next we have, “Resist not evil with evil.” This is from Matthew 5:39,
except that most translations of the Bible don’t quite translate it this
way. Rather than being a call to not resist evil with evil means (which makes
sense), Matthew 5:39 is generally translated as a call to not resist evil period,

[38] Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth
for a tooth: [39] But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever
shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. [40] And
if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have
[thy] cloke also.

I’ve always thought this was one of the more goofier of the New Testament teachings.
A lot of Christian analyses of this passage really jumps through a lot of hoops
to try to argue that it does not entail pacifism.

Finally, we have a “Where are the weapons of mass destruction” sign.
As I told the woman I talked with, I never thought it made much sense to emphasize
the WMD argument which seems to have been done largely in the failed attempt
to obtain a second UN resolution. Maybe they’ll find WMD, maybe they won’t,
but it shouldn’t have been the focus of the pro-war argument.

The guy with the big white sign wansts to know if we’re “Liberators or
oppressors?” I wonder how these
folks
would have answered questions about oppression in Iraq?

Next to him is a woman “Make love not war.” Why not make love and war?

Maybe we should “Wage Peace.” Well, that’s apparently the United
Nations view as well, and we all saw how well that worked in Rwanda.

Finally, “Bush Lies” and “Send our troops home!”

These are really hard to see (stupid digital camera metering).

On the far left, we have a person with a sign reading, “The rich start
wars, the poor get slaughtered.” The man with the fabric sign on two sticks
is proclaiming that “Violence is no solution.” Next to him, a man
is holding a sign reading, “Who has used weapons of mass destruction –
U.S.A.”

And next to him, “Instead of weapons invest in people of Israel &
Palestine.”

Note: As a public service, I’ve included all of the photographs I took of the protests on July 13, 2003 here. These are free to use for any purpose provided you credit me, Brian Carnell, as the photographer. Take them, edit them, republish them, whatever.

Mark Pilgrim’s Winer Watcher

Dave Winer is still throwing a fit over Mark Pilgrim’s Winer Watch and threatening to again essentially stop writing Scripting.Com if Pilgrim does not stop his script.

It’s not publicly available anymore, but for awhile you could go to http://diveintomark.org/ww/ and see Pilgrim’s automated system which tracked edits that Winer made to Scripting.Com. I thought it was a pretty clever RSS hack, but Winer did not. Winer initially complained about all of the bandwidth being used since Winer Watch was polling his RSS feed very 5 minutes. Pilgrim responded that he was using a set of distributed mirrors from people who were already checking Scripting.Com’s RSS feed once an hour anyway, so the system would have no impact on Scripting.Com’s bandwidth.

Now Winer has fallen back on the claim that tracking and posting edits he makes to his website is unethical and the equivalent of extremely rude and likely illegal behavior in the real world,

. . . I guess it’s time for weblogs to become like television. Polished and politically correct. Impersonal. Commercial. That’s what they’re really saying. When there’s no room to change your mind, there’s no way to take a chance. That’s about it. They found a way to stop me from taking chances.

. . .

When I was a kid, the NYC subway had an emergency brake in every car. It was an amazing thing. Any person on the train could at any time cause the whole train to stop. The amazing thing is that in all the subway riding I did (every weekday for three years when I was in high school) no one ever pulled the cord. Even in New York City, which is known for people doing really rude stuff. From that I concluded that humanity works, most people are honest, they know that anyone could pull the cord, so what’s the point of doing it. That’s how it should work here. It’s no trick to write a script that reads my RSS feed every five minutes and posts the diffs in reverse chronologic order. That’s what we’re dealing with here, the kind of people who would pull the cord. They did. The train stopped. Now what? You decide. If the service continues, Scripting News will just be links to articles. If it stops, I’ll keep writing.

Some, such as Aaron Hockley, agree with Winer,

Scripting News is one man’s thoughts. John Kenneth Galbraith once said that “Faced with the choice between changing one’s mind and proving there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.” I find it more interesting and a sign of a more critical thinker to alter one’s thoughts and comments. By allowing his positions, opinions, and comments to flex as time progresses, Dave is more true to himself and more open to the influences of others.

The problem, of course, is that Winer is involved in many public debates (which always seem to devolve into flame wars) and in that context Winer’s constant editing is infuriating to many of those involved. Many months ago, for example, Winer posted a rather mild insult directed to me on Scripting.Com. I never actually saw it, though, because he later went back and erased it. But several people who were subscribed to his RSS feed e-mailed me about it.

Now I could care less, but suppose I had written a blog entry linking to his post and then it suddenly disappears or is completely rewritten to be more innocuous. That’s the sort of concern that motivated Pilgrim’s Winer Watcher.

Winer’s position, on the other hand, seems to be that he should not be held responsible for what he posts in a public forum if he later decides that he’s changed his mind and wants to rewrite or simply delete his comments. So if Winer makes some rude comment and goes back later and edits it out, we should all just pretend that he never actually posted it.

This is the sort of explanation I expect (and occasionally receive) from my 6 year old daughter to justify her moments of less than stellar behavior. By the time she is an adult, I would hope she has understood that the things she does and says have consequences and that part of maturing is being accepting responsibility for your words and deeds.