NYT on E-Books

The New York Times has a second look at e-books in An Idea Whose Time Has Come Back. For me, e-books never went away — I will read physical books on occasion, but 90 percent of the books I read these days are e-books that I load on my Pocket PC.

I definitely identify with the NYT’s featured e-book reader,

One such reader is Rebecca Kroll of Scotch Plains, N.J., a live-in caretaker for an autistic teenager, who says she burns through three or four books a day and purchases 50 to 100 a week, an expensive habit that she says costs her up to $400 weekly. “Storage is a big issue with me,” Kroll says. Before she discovered e-books a little over a year ago, 12,000 books crammed her apartment from floor to ceiling, leaving her desperate for more shelf space. Although Kroll says she was initially ill at ease with computers, she now does most of her reading on a laptop and stores thousands of romance and science fiction fantasy novels on two computer disks.

Exactly. I used to have several thousand books crammed in my house — they’re all history now, off to used book stores or trashed. It’s nice to know that if I wanted to, even without using compression, I could fit about 1,500 books on a $70 1gb SD card, and carry another 1,500 around on a second 1 gb SD card. 3,000 books in a tiny space for the price that a single halfway decent bookcase would cost.

The article also notes the ongoing war over DRM,

Already a culture war reminiscent of the one surrounding Napster is shaping up in the world of digital books. My college-age son is in the contingent that reads e-books almost exclusively from free Web sites because of the greater flexibility offered by their unencrypted books. Such sites usually offer plain-text format, which allows him to print as many pages as he needs, or to copy a long quotation from a book electronically and paste it into his term paper. Free sites, at least the legitimate ones, are limited to books for which the copyright has expired. Yet they are popular, especially among students assigned classic works. The University of Virginia library, which makes 1,800 titles available free from its Web site, has sent more than 8.5 million downloadable books to readers since it started the service in August 2000.

Some believe that all e-books should be free of software protection limits. Cory Doctorow, an advocate for less restrictive digital rights at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, made his first novel available free online. He argues that digital content’s unique forms of adaptability — to e-mail, computerized cut-and-paste and software translation engines — are all areas where paper books lag. In his view, anyone who puts a software lock on an e-book is crazy.

I won’t buy an e-book that has DRM, unless I’ve already got a tool to crack the DRM. Adding DRM eliminates much of the usefulness of having the book in electronic format.

The leader here, of course, is Baen’s Webscription program, which allows the reader to download pretty much every book Baen publishes, completely DRM free, for either a month subscription fee or a per-book fee.

The other thing about Baen is that it is significantly cheaper — as it should be — to buy its books online rather than in paper form. For example, $15 will get you all 7 of the books Baen published in April 2004; an incredible deal given that sci-fi paperbacks tend to retail for $5-$7 these days.

It’s a shame that more publishers don’t take Baen’s lead.

Source:

An Idea Whose Time Has Come Back. Sarah Glazer, The New York Times, December 5, 2004.

Pat Sajak Gets It

Pat Sajak, of all people, highlights exactly what I was getting at in I Wish the Terrorists Were Christians,

Somewhere in the world, a filmmaker creates a short documentary that chronicles what he perceives as the excesses of anti-abortion activists. An anti-abortion zealot reacts to the film by killing the filmmaker in broad daylight and stabbing anti-abortion tracts onto his body. How does the Hollywood community react to this atrocity? Would there be angry protests? Candlelight vigils? Outraged letters and columns and articles? Awards named in honor of their fallen comrade? Demands for justice? Calls for protection of artistic freedom? ItÂ’s a pretty safe bet that there would be all of the above and much more. And all of the anger would be absolutely justified.

So IÂ’m trying to understand the nearly universal lack of outrage coming from Hollywood over the brutal murder of Dutch director, Theo van Gogh, who was shot on the morning of November 2, while bicycling through the streets of Amsterdam. The killer then stabbed his chest with one knife and slit his throat with another.

. . .

The presumed murderer, a Dutch-born dual Moroccan-Dutch citizen, attached a 5-page note to van Gogh’s body with a knife. In it, he threatened jihad against the West in general, and specifically against five prominent Dutch political figures. Van GoghÂ’s crime? He created a short film highly critical of the treatment of women in Islamic societies. So, again I ask, where is the outrage from HollywoodÂ’s creative community? I mean, talk about a violation of the right of free speech!

Sajak appears to think that the reason is that Hollywood liberals don’t want to align themselves with the Bush administration, but I think its a deeper animus among left wing elites that priveleges non-Western religions and ideologies, even when they are out-and-out fascist in nature.

Source:

A Hush Over Hollywood. Pat Sajak, Human Events Online, November 30, 2004.

43 Folders

Even thought it is Mac-centric, 43 Folders is an excellent geek-oriented blog on hacking together different tools to maximize productivity. If you’ve joined the Getting Things Done cult (and I’ve become a full fledged believer), this site is like crack. If you’re the sort of person who would actually need something like this (and I certainly do), this is the site for you.

The 43 Folders Google Group is even better, with lots of great ideas and interesting speculation on solving various geek-related problems.

On Sleep

I definitely count myself among one of the sleep-deprived. The sad thing is that I know not sleeping enough ultimately lowers my productivity, I can’t help it — I enjoy staying up late with a caffeine buzz.

Anyway, this is an interesting look at sleep and the effects of sleep deprivation with some pretty radical suggestions (get rid of the alarm clock? Doesn’t he mean get rid of the alarm clocks — I’ve got three).

I’m skeptical of some of the claims the author throws around — the claim, for example, that sleep deprivation costs upwards of $150 billion sounds like those factoids about the costs of obesity or some other pet concern.

But I do like his ultimate proposal — run a 28 hour day — and some of the suggestions for getting sleep deprived habits back on schedule. Interesting stuff to ponder, at least until provigil or some other drug comes along to make sleep unnecessary (after dying, sleeping has to be the second most pointless physiological reality).

Source:

Good sleep, good learning, good life. Piotr Wozniak, 2000.