On a Related Topic . . .

For the last few months I’ve been (slowly) updating all of the articles on this site with a keyword system. Whenever I update the site with a new entry, I have a list of 13 categories with numerous subcategories under each of them.

For example, when I posted this article about a new high-resolution image of Saturn, I clicked on a couple options to indicate that it was a Science-related story, and then one level deeper it was an Astronomy-related story.

Not all stories have been marked up in this way, but I am slowly getting through the older ones (it took me awhile to settle on a taxonomy I liked). Now, though, for those stories that are labeled with keywords, a “Related Topics” set of links shows up in the right hand column. Visit that story about Saturn, for example, and a link back to the Astronomy page shows up under “Related Topics.” My recent review of a baseball computer games includes links back to both my baseball page and my computer games page.

This is the sort of thing that Conversant really shines at. I have complete control over what sort of categories and subcategories I want to set up, adding or deleting categories and subcategories takes just a few seconds, and once articles are tagged with this sort of metadata, there are some extremely powerful knowledge management-style applications that can be done without a lot of effort. Changing the template for this site to display the Related Topics information took just a few minutes.

Is a New Movie Worse than 9/11 Terrorist Attacks?

Jeff Deverett produces a kid’s show in Toronto called Ricky’s Room that is carried by some PBS channels. Deverett is currently protesting the new film, Death to Smoochy, a dark comedy about such children’s shows. According to Deverett, Death to Smoochy is the equivalent of the Sept. 11 attacks for kids.

When the World Trade Center fell, it was like a movie happening. But when a mascotted character like Barney gets his head blown off, that’s real. It’s real violence on their level. To [kids], this movie is Sept. 11.

Of course young kids who are watching an R-rated movie like this probably have at least one and maybe two problems that are far worse than anything in Death to Smoochy.

The funny thing is that Deverett claims he is suing Warner Bros. on the grounds that the Smoochy character is to close to his Ricky character. Yeah, because Everett’s the only person in the world who ever thought of putting an actor in a dumb-looking animal suit and building a kid’s show around it.

The 9/11 comparison, on the other hand, puts Deverett in a far more exclusive group of idiots.

Source:

Smoochy gets the kiss-off from kiddie show. Tamsen Tillson, Toronto Globe and Mail, March 27, 2002.

My Herbalife Story

Boing!Boing! pointed to this long article by a person in Sacramento that starts out being about ugly signs offering a work-at-home scam and ends up being about Herbalife.

After college, my first job was working for a hospital laundry. The laundry had very little handle on its inventory and bought a half-assed system to try to keep better track of it. The whole system was a disaster, and it was my job to get it to work.

I had to work regularly with the manager of the linen facility at a hospital, and this guy was one of those goofballs who it is extremely difficult to fathom how he ever rose to the management level. The guy was a schemer with lots of ideas and wacky business ideas and not a whole lot of brains or persistence to actually follow through.

One of the things he constantly pestered me about was Herbalife. He was constantly telling me about all the weight he was losing as well as trying to get me involved with the MLM scam/scheme. I thought it was inappropriate, but that pretty much summed my view of everything this guy did.

Finally, though, I just wanted to get him to shut up so I agreed to go to his little MLM meeting. If you’ve never been to one of these things, they are really fascinating (but if you’re going to go, do like I do and make sure you don’t bring any form of money with you — I had like five dollars in my pocket, and that was probably to much around these folks).

The entire evening was half revival meeting and half the most manipulative sales pitch you’ll likely experience. The whole idea is basically a scam — there is no way in hell the people like the laundry manager are ever going to get rich. On the other hand, though, the very tiny number of people who are able to convince their friends and complete strangers to throw their money into this are like the sharks of the sales world — there’s nobody better nor more vicious.

The leader of this event looked like a 45-year-old Tom Cruise who was doing too much Herbalife. He was thin to the point of bordering on gaunt. He looked a little bit like a world class long distance runner, except from his skin complexion it was obvious he was probably following a drastic diet to keep his weight low to impress the people he was pitching.

And the guy was slick. Too slick. Con man slick. Michael Douglas in Wall Street slick. He gave some very spirited talk about all the money he had made, the vacations he had taken, the cars he owned, etc., etc. Then, of course, when he’s done he announces some special offer just for newcomers like myself. For something approaching $1,000 we can get $1,500 worth of merchandise to sell, and they start with the nonsensical litany of uplines and downlines or whatever the terminology was.

The cool thing about not having any money with you is you can let the full effect of this hit you. It’s interesting just how easily some people can use your fears and hopes to manipulate you. I could see why people would find this sort of pitch attractive, even though you’d have to be insane to say yes and put up your money.

The sad thing was that while the laundry manager is pulling out all the stops trying to convince me (and, of course, I have to make my decision right now), it’s pretty clear that the big guy is manipulating him. The laundry manager wasn’t a bad salesman but he never was very convincing — and fell hook, line and sinker for the big guy’s pep talks about what a great salesman he was and how determination and drive could make him rich.

Finally, after listening to the pitch several times and refusing several times the meeting is over and I am out of there. Walking out feels like you’ve been trapped in a cave underground for a year and are finally being allowed to see the light of day.

And, of course, I drive straight to the library because now I’m very curious. Of course, this was the early 1990s and by then Herbalife had already had run-ins with various legal authorities over illegal and dangerous ingredients in its products, tax problems by its founder, and all sorts of other issues. It wasn’t a pretty picture.

The next day I have to drive out to the hospital, and while I’m there hand this guy a manila folder asking him if he’s aware of the previous investigations of Herbalife, not to mention all the crap that is in these supplements he’s popping because Herbalife tells him they’re all natural and they’re cleansing his body.

And the color completely leaves his face. For an instant he has this look that is just priceless. This guys’s spent thousands of dollars of his money, persuaded family and friends to get involved, and he hasn’t even done even a cursory investigation of Herbalife. He’s screwed.

But he recovers pretty quickly. He’s hooked. I could have just shown him pictures of his wife with the big guy and he’d still be convinced that Herbalife is going to make him rich. I explain to him that even if I wanted to take Herbalife — which I most certainly do not — I could not because the products were chock full of ephedrine (although, consistent with its business practices, Herbalife never listed ephedrine in the ingredients list).

At which point he turns to me, very sincerely — he’s not trying to insult me at all, he clearly feels sorry for me — and asks, “So you’re just going to have to stay fat?” Which is when it hits me that this guy is totally dominated by his own fears. Fear of being fat, fear of not having enough money, fear of not being as successful as other people, and he’s the perfect sucker for this scam.

I have no idea whatever happened to him. A couple months, later I couldn’t take that job anymore and quit. A couple years later I partially mastered my own weight problems and dropped 50 pounds (and I’ve kept it off) without having to throw hundreds of dollars after unhealthy supplements (it’s amazing what giving up fast food and exercising once in a while will do).

Mark Hughes, who started Herbalife in the early 1980s, was not so lucky. He was found dead in August 2000 in the $27 million mansion that he had bought by suckering people. The 44-year-old apparently had all the money he could ever want but couldn’t kick his alcoholism. He died after a four-day-long binge of drinking alcohol in combination with anti-depressants.

WHO: Tuberculsosis Efforts Falling Behind

The World Health Organization issued a report this month noting that the world is falling behind in efforts to contain tuberculosis. According to the WHO,

A strategy that can cure up to 90% of all tuberculosis cases, and thus is the best chance for controlling the global epidemic, is reaching only 27% of the world’s TB patients. . . . According to the new WHO report, at the current rate, TB targets set for 2005 will not be reached until 2013.

Tuberculosis currently kills about 2 million people a year, and is the number one preventable cause of death in the developing world.

The main thing holding back better treatment of tuberculosis is money. WHO estimates that countries around the world need to spend about $300 million more per year to control tuberculosis.

Source:

Funding ‘hits tuberculosis fight’. The BBC, March 24, 2002.

Only a fraction of TB patients get the best care. World Health Organization, Press Release, March 22, 2002.

Is Pain Research Worthless?

Patricia Wolff of New West Research recently posted an e-mail to AR-NEWS about animal research conducted at the John Hopkins School of Medicine which Wolff headlined, “Painful, Worthless Animal Experiment.” In fact, while the experiment was, of necessity, painful, it was far from worthless.

The study involved research into whether or not a soy-based diet can reduce pain and inflammation, and was the result of a chance observation by John Hopkins researchers while collaborating with an Israeli researcher on sabbatical in this country.

The Israeli researcher had bred a strain of rats for use in studying nerve injury pain. Some of those rats were sent to the United States. But when he began his experiments in the United States, the rats did not experience as much pain as did his mice back in Israel. After eliminating a number of factors, it turned out that the two sets of rats had been fed different diets. The rats in the United States had been fed a soy-based diet.

John Hopkins researcher Jill Tall and her colleagues set out to discover if the soy-based diet was indeed responsible for the diminished pain. So they took 20 rats, and fed 10 of them a dairy protein diet and the other 10 a soy based diet. Then the rats were randomly injected with either a placebo or an inflammatory solution. The rats who received the inflammatory solution and were on the soy-based diet experienced significantly less inflammation than the rats fed the dairy protein diet.

The rats on a soy-based diet also exhibited a much higher pain tolerance than did the rats on the dairy protein diet.

This is obviously a small, preliminary study but will lead to further studies. Currently Tall and her colleagues are looking in detail at the soy protein trying to get a better idea of what might component might be helping to relieve pain.

Many people seem to think that such pain research is an unjustifiable use of animals. But Tall is a research fellow in anesthesiology and critical care who specializes in pain experienced by cancer patients. The reality is that the advent of safe, reliable anesthetics relied heavily on animal research (anesthetic techniques which are also used to minimize the pain of animals during medical research). Continued progress on relieving pain will also rely on animal research which, by its very nature, unfortunately involves intentionally inflicting pain on animals.

Wolff had it half right — such research is painful, but hardly worthless.

Source:

Soy diet eases pain, animal study finds. Nicolle Charbonneau, HealthScoutNews, March 15, 2002.

Bill O'Reilly and Bridget Chufo vs. Howard Lyman

Howard Lyman appeared on The O’Reilly Factor on February 26 making the case for vegetarianism. Bill O’Reilly wondered if simply eating in moderation wasn’t the key to health and long life, leading to this exchange between Lyman and Bridget Chufo, the founder of Healthy Performance Weight Loss and Wellness Center,

LYMAN: Well, vegetarians live 10 years longer than people on the standard American diet.

O’REILLY: Is that true, Ms. Chofu?

BRIDGET CHUFO, HEALTHY PERFORMANCE WEIGHT LOSS CTR.: Well, I think you’re mixing up some confusion here in the sense that vegetarians, right, nine to 10 years longer. But most vegetarians have a more healthy lifestyle in the sense that they don’t smoke, they don’t drink, their exercise, they sleep adequately. So just eating in a healthier manner, in a vegetarian way, may not be the single variable that we’re talking about here.

O’REILLY: Right, but does Mr. Lyman have a point that eating meat and dairy products and things like that are harmful to you?

CHUFO: I agree with you, Mr. O’Reilly. Everything in moderation. The fewer foods that you can pick from, the fewer nutrients that you’re going to get into your body, especially with the kids. The kids need protein. And they’re not always going to get it from the nuts and the seeds and the tofu and things of this nature, simply because we have to deal with reality.

I have some pretty strong disagreements with Chufo, but she is spot on about the reason why vegetarians tend to live longer than non-vegetarians, with the proviso that vegetarians also likely benefit from increased consumption of fruits and vegetables (i.e, one of the problems with the standard American diet is not that it includes meat, but rather that it does not include enough fruits and vegetables.

Source:

Meatless or Meaningless? The O’Reilly Factor, Transcript, February 26, 2002.