Don’t Taunt the Dictator

The South African Press Association reports that Zimbabwe’s government has enacted a new law making it a crime to,

. . .make any gesture or statement within the view or hearing of the state motorcade with the intention of insulting any person travelling with an escort or any member of the escort.

The press association notes that Robert Mugabe’s motorcade is colloquially known as “Bob and the Wailers” because of the blaring sirens from motorcycle escorts.

Apparently Mugabe’s opponents have been shouting opposition political slogans and salutes at Mugabe’s motorcade.

This follows passage of a law earlier this year making it a crime punishable by up to a year in jail for anyone who “makes an abusive or indecent or obscene or false statement” about Mugabe. Earlier this month a man was arrested in Harare for carrying a sign that read,

God shall confront Mugabe over evils done to people. Then would the police and the Central Intelligence Organization arrest god on that day?

They’d probably try.

Source:

New laws bans rude gestures, swearing at Mugabe motorcade. South African Press Association (Johannesburg), November 18, 2002.

New York, Illinois Politicians Whitewash Zimbabwe Tyranny in Report

Several New York state politicians, along with an Illinois colleague, recently visited Zimbabwe and have released a unanimous report that whitewashes Robert Mugabe’s tyrannical rule over that nation.

New York City Council Members Charles Barron and James Davis; New York State Assembly members State Assemblyman Adam Clayton Powell III; and Illinois State Senator Donne Trotter visited Zimbabwe on a fact finding mission sponsored by The Black World Today.

The group apparently decided that they would release a work of fiction to commemorate their visit. As The Black World Today’s resident Zimbabwe apologist Donna Lamb summarized the group’s findings,

In brief, the unanimous findings of Barron, Davis, Powell and Trotter are that for such a young nation Zimbabwe has succeeded in accomplishing some tremendously important things, and the hard work continues. To revile a brand new country for not solving its problems fast enough is unfair, and to expect the leadership to accomplish everything without any mistakes is unrealistic. As Assemblyman Powell put it, “This is a newly developed country that was colonized for umpteen number of years and now it’s just coming into its own. You have to expect them to make mistakes. They have problems just like we have problems, and we have to be patient.”

Powell here is describing a nation that is currently experiencing double digit declines in output and is on the verge of a famine that could kill hundreds of thousands of people. Powell is whitewashing a tyrannical regime which is openly withholding food aid from people whom it believes side with the opposition. For Powell to claim that “they have problems just like we have problems” is prima facie evidence that he is unfit to serve in any capacity at any level of government.

The group’s claims about Mugabe’s “land reform” read like they were written by the PR wing of Mugabe’s Zanu PF,

As Councilman Barron explained, even though the Black Zimbabweans agreed about the urgent need for land reform, after Mugabe became President he kept dragging his feet. The white farmers loved him for it, but the Zimbabweans grew more and more impatient with him. However, he continued to ignore them for a decade and a half, until 1995 when he began land reform in earnest. Stated Barron, “Mugabe said there’s 4,500 farms owned by whites and we’re going to take back 2,900 from those who own multiple farms and leave them with the single one of their choosing. He told them they would be reimbursed for any structures and development of their farms, but not for the land itself.”

Mugabe promised white farmers he would never pursue this route in order to keep them in the country after its independence. Far from legitimate land reform, the seizure of white farms has been used as part of a patronage system to reward Mugabe’s followers. Not only have most blacks not benefited from the land seizures, but they are in fact suffering the most from the food shortages it has caused. Many white farmers had the means to move them and their families out of the country — an option which is unfortunately not available to those whom Mugabe’s policies have relegated to extreme levels of poverty.

Barron offers one of the most ridiculous quotes I’ve ever read about African food shortages,

Even here they found that there isn’t an intense anti-Mugabe feeling and that most of the people associate the food shortage not with land reform, but with the draught. There are diehard political opponents who want to say land reform is to blame, but it simply makes no sense. As Barron commented, “Africans knew how to farm long before the Europeans came. Then they were farming the land after the colonization because they were forced to do it for the Europeans. What would make anyone think that they lost a sense of farming now that they have the land back for themselves once again? The logic escapes me.”

Apparently Barron believes farming is something that is genetically passed along through Africans — just pluck a Zimbabwean family from urban squalor, plop it on a plot of land, and the family will just instinctively know how to properly manage a farm. The reality is that the seized land has been given to people with little knowledge or ability to properly farm the land and the result is a tremendous decline in food production. The drought explanation is simply absurd (one wonders if Barron also attributes Zimbabwe’s precipitous decline in economic production to drought — perhaps commercial and industrial enterprises are simply wilting due to lack of water).

Lamb — who is, frankly, one of the more despicable people I’ve had the misfortune to read this year — offers a classic fellow traveler-style take on Zimbabwe’s well-documented use of torture, violence and murder against the opposition parties,

The MDC said that during the 2000 election Mugabe’s ZANU-PF party used intimidation and violence. When asked about it, official representatives of ZANU-PF said that some of that did indeed happen. It occurred on both sides, but more so on the government’s side. However, Mugabe had known nothing of it at the time; he certainly hadn’t initiated it, and he condemns any of that kind of action now.

Yeah, he was only the president and leader of his party at the time. It’s completely outrageous that his critics might seem to think he had something to do with the all of the beatings, torture and political killings in Zimbabwe. But, instead, Mugabe was actually blissfully ignorant. Right, and Iraq doesn’t have any weapons of mass destruction.

Lamb’s take on repression of homosexuals in Zimbabwe is instructive of this sort of idiocy,

Other reports have reached this country that Mugabe was beating, jailing even killing homosexuals. Across the board, people said that was ridiculous. Mugabe had said some negative things, but basically in African society they declare that you can be what you want to be, however you just can’t do what you want to do in public, whether you’re hetero- or homosexual.

Mugabe said negative things? He gave a speech in which he said gays were “worse than pigs and dogs . . . a scourge planted by the white man on a pure continent.” Mugabe went on to urge Zimbabwe’s media to take up the fight against homosexuals by exposing their activities. The government-owned The Herald ran ads proclaiming that called for a “crusade” against homosexuals claming that “God commands the death of sexual perverts.” Male homosexuality is a crime in Zimbabwe punishable by up to eight years in jail (lesbianism is technically not illegal, but lesbians are arrested and charged on other offenses).

And just when you think things can’t get worse, Lamb and her fellow apologists just keep getting nuttier. Mugabe has arrested, tortured and sometimes killed his opponents. He’s used gangs of supporters to intimidate voters and denies food aid to those he thinks side with the MDC. But who are we to judge him — after all, the United States didn’t hold a presidential election until 1789!!! Lamb writes,

One of the things all 4 elected officials saw was the double standard this country uses in judging Zimbabwe and its history, and our own. They won their freedom in 1979 and had their first election in 1980, just one year after. “But,” said Powell, “this nation took 13 years just to have an election for president. We had General George Washington running the country from 1776 until 1789 when he was first elected.”

What an idiot. Prior to the ratification of the United States, of course, the country was governed by the Congress of the United States as laid out quite clearly in the Articles of Confederation which was agreed to in 1777 and ratified in force in 1781. Powell also seems unaware that Washington resigned as commander-in-chief of the Continental Army in 1783.

Well, he doesn’t know anything about Zimbabwe, why should we expect him to know anything about his own country?

Sources:

Elected Officials Take Fact-Finding Trip To Zimbabwe. Donna Lamb, The Black World Today, November 7, 2002.

African American Group Disputes Mugabe’s Claims On Land Reform. Mthulisi Mathuthu, Zimbabwe Independent (Harare), November 15, 2002.

Homosexual and hated in Zimbabwe. The BBC, August 12, 1998.

Mugabe Blocks Food Aid to Opponents

Late last week the United Nations confirmed what had been rumored for the past couple weeks — Zimbabwe has ordered Oxfam and Save the Children to stop distributing food aid in areas that Robert Mugabe’s ruling party believes are hotbeds of opposition support.

In a Mail & Guardian (Johannesberg) story”>http://allafrica.com/stories/200210170594.html”>story, UN FAO representative Tony Hall is quoted as saying,

This is political obstruction of desperately needed food aid at a crucial point. If people do not get food now, many will die . . . Government officials confirmed they will not allow those NGOs to distribute food aid for political reasons, because the government views them as loyal to the opposition party. I said that is unacceptable. They are major international organisations with fine reputations for non-partisan activity.

I guess that puts Zimbabwe up to stage 7 in Genocide Watch’s warning of Zimbabwe’s path to politicide.

Source:

Zim Bans Food Aid Charities. Andrew Meldrum, Mail & Guardian (Johannesburg), October 18, 2002.

Zimbabwe, Genocide and AIDS

Glenn Reynolds links to an article speculating that Zimbabwe might be on the verge of heading down the same path that Idi Amin’s Uganda took. But the scary thing is that even without that sort of problem, the long term result of Robert Mugabe’s tyranny is going to be unbelievably high numbers of deaths in Zimbabwe due to something that’s been a bit overlooked — the AIDS crisis.

Yes, millions of people in Zimbabwe are at risk of starvation and political violence is likely to rise, but even if those two outcomes are averted, Zimbabwe is headed toward an HIV Holocaust.

In July the United Nations released a report on AIDS in Africa claiming that by 2020, more than 68 million people in Africa will likely die from AIDS. And Zimbabwe is the poster child for the epidemic.

In 1997, an estimated 25 percent of all adults in Zimbabwe were HIV positive. While Mugabe fiddled about with seizing white farms and jailing opposition parties and journalists, that figure jumped to an estimated 33 percent of all adults in Zimbabwe being HIV positive.

Other countries, such as Botswana, have larger estimated rates of infection, and certainly places like South Africa have dragged their feet at dealing with the epidemic, but at the moment Zimbabwe seems the leading candidate for the nightmare scenario where AIDS all but wipes out a large nation. If Mugabe is able to hold on to power like Mobutu did in Zaire and Amin did in Uganda, by the end of the decade Zimbabwe will likely be looking at HIV infection rates in excess of 50 percent of the adult population and with no end or solution in sight.

McKinney Madness Runs in the Family

During her re-election campaign, Cynthia McKinney got caught using recycled endorsements from Andrew Young. Young endorsed her last time, but stayed out of the current contest probably due to McKinney’s controversial post-9/11 comments.

It turns out that McKinney’s father, Bill, has a theory about that whole imbroglio — the Jews did it!!

Again, as reported by the web site of WXIA-TV,

The comments followed 11Alive asking Billy McKinney about his daughter using an old endorsement from former Atlanta Mayor Andrew Young.

“That ain’t nothing. That’s nothing,” he said. “Jews have bought everybody. Jews… J-E-W-S.”

Hey, at least he can spell. Can you imagine those family get-togethers? Probably devoted to discussing how the Jews are plotting against Robert Mugabe.

Now We Know Why Cynthia McKinney Liked Mugabe So Much

Last week I noted that Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga) was the only (to my knowledge) national politician to stand up and defend Zimbabwean strongman Robert Mugabe. In her statement opposing sanctions against Zimbabwe, McKinney defended Zimbabwe’s corrupt and rigged elections as commendable as compared to what she sees as the wholesale sellout of democracy over what happened in Florida in 2000.

But McKinney’s supporters have a very odd idea of what counts as fair electioneering practices. Somebody has been making tape recorded calls in Georgia targeted at Republican voters telling them that they could be arrested if they vote in the Democratic primary.

The web site for WXIA-TV reports that the message says,

This is an official notice for Republican voters. It is a violation of state and federal law to attempt to vote in a Democratic primary without proper documentation. State and federal enforcement officials will be monitoring the polling places closely tomorrow for violations of the law. Do not risk violating the law by trying to vote in a Democratic primary without the proper documents.

Georgia, like many states, has an open primary system so any registered voter can vote in either the Democratic or Republican primary. The only thing any voter needs to vote in either primary is just some sort of legal identification such as a driver’s license. In McKinney’s case since there’s no way the Republicans are going to win the seat in her district, Republicans have been urging their voters to vote for McKinney’s opponent in the Democratic primary. Apparently somebody’s afraid that strategy might work.

The phone messages themselves are likely a violation of federal and state laws against voter intimidation.

Just the sort of thing that Robert Mugabe would try to discourage opposition voters.