Over the past few months, I’ve occasionally posted photographs of anti-war protests held in downtown Kalamazoo every Tuesday and Sunday. Those protests are sponsored by a local group called Kalamazoo Non-violent Opponents of War. The group was formed to protest the war on Iraq but their politics go into a wide range of left wing causes and issues.
For example, their web site endorses three left wing candidates for the seven-seat city commission: Don Cooney, David Juarez and Elizabeth Forest, which certainly helps me figure out better who not to vote for (not that I usually vote anyway, but should I have nothing better to do next Tuesday . . .)
Here’s how the city commission election works around here. There are only seven seats and they are all up for re-election. Anybody registered votes for up to seven of the candidates listed on the ballot, and at the end of the day the top seven candidates win. The person with the most total votes is also the mayor.
What is interesting about KNOW’s endorsement is that they are not only recommending that people vote for these three candidates but they are recommending that people vote only for those three candidates. According to KNOW,
Please note that although you are ABLE to vote for SEVEN candidates, you are NOT OBLIGED TO. If you vote for a full slate of seven candidates, YOU ARE
DILUTING YOUR VOTES FOR DON, DAVID, AND ELIZABETH. Let’s do all we can to re-elect Don Cooney and to insure that he will no longer be so often a lonely dissenter in his votes and his support for the poor and the voiceless, and for the way of peace and non-violence. Our recommendation: VOTE FOR THREE, AND LET IT BE!
Of course there’s nothing inappropriate going on here and KNOW can advocate any sort of voting strategy it likes, but it’s a bit odd to see a group dedicated to a rather radical version of democracy on the other hand tell its members that voting on the other four commission seats is a Bad Idea(TM).
Plus this is exactly the sort of strategy that usually gets criticized in left-liberal publications when it has been used, say, to elect anti-abortion candidates to local office so they can use their position as a platform for their views.
I’m kind of mixed about the election itself. On the one hand, Kalamazoo has had a lot of economic problems and the election of these three would likely signal to businesses that are fleeing the city that they might want to move out even faster. On the other hand I’d like to buy a house in this area and that would further depress home values, so it’s really a wash there.