Star Trek Gets the George Lucas Treatment

It was bad enough that Gene Roddenberry and his successors chose to neuter the Star Trek universe with monstrosities like Jean Luc Picard (see “Homeward” for all the proof you’ll ever need of Picard’s depravity), but now Paramount is finishing the job of stabbing the original series in the back with a “remastered” version featuring new special effects. Ugh.

According to a Wired story on the changes,

CBS Paramount says the make-over is intended to enhance the show’s visual appeal while staying true to the original look and feel of the series.

“Nothing really has changed except for the fact that it’s just prettier to look at,” said John Nogawski, president of CBS Paramount Domestic Television, in a recent conference call with reporters. “Right down to placement of stars, it is being resimulated to be exactly what was there in the first place.”

Hmmm…lets run that corporate-speak through the universal translator,

“Nothing has really changed,” said John Nogawski, “we’re still milking Star Trek for whatever we can get out of it, and we no enough fanboys will tune in to watch the remastered version and buy the DVD to keep us in the manner we’re accustomed until the next crappy Star Trek film is ready to go. After all, what really mattered about the original Star Trek was the special effects.”

Source:

Original Star Trek Gets Upgraded. Wired, September 15, 2006.

Seagate Envisions 2.5 TB HDs; Brian Envisions Storage Nirvana

In a press release, hard drive manufacturer Seagate announced that it had broken there record for storing the most bits per square inch on magnetic media and said that 2.5 TB hard drives could be a reality by 2009.

According to the press release,

At the demonstrated density level, Seagate expects the capacity ranges to result in solutions ranging in 40GB to 275GB for 1-and 1.8-inch consumer electronics drives, 500GB for 2.5-inch notebook drives, and nearly 2.5TB for 3.5-inch desktop and enterprise class drives. At 2.5TB capacity, a hard drive would be capable of storing 41,650 hours of music, 800,000 digital photographs, 4,000 hours of digital video or 1,250 video games. Seagate anticipates that solutions at these density levels could begin to emerge in 2009.

Take four of those, put them in a RAID array and you’ve got enough space to rip 1200 DVDs at full quality. Still not enough space, but at least they’re making progress.

Source:

Seagate Breaks World Magnetic Recording Density Record – 421 Gbits Per Square Inch Equivalent to Storing 4,000 Hours of Digital Video on Your PC. Press Release, Seagate, September 15, 2006.

Marvel Alters “Essential” Tomb of Dracula Comics

Marvel has been collecting the run of its 1970s-ish Tomb of Dracula in relatively cheap softcover volumes. Groovy Age of Horror has the lowdown on how Marvel has been altering the comics as it reprints them.

The originals included a number of scenes featuring bare-breasted women, but in the “Essential” reprints, either new artwork has been added to cover the offending parts or the frame is cropped to eliminate the nudity.

Yet another reason to simply stick with downloading comics.

Focus on Being F’n Amazing

MVP handed me a copy of this excellent post from Creating Passionate Users about the ass-backward way that most performance evaluations tend to focus on cataloging employees’ weaknesses and improving them, rather than cataloging their strengths and focusing on enhancing and exploiting them to benefit the organization.

Too many companies (and managers, spouses, etc.) focus too much on bringing everyone up to some level of competency in a laundry-list of attributes including time-management, communication skills, writing ability, filling out TPS reports, teamwork/teamplayer, attitude, organization, sensitivity, adhering to corporate goals and policies, etc. Clearly, there is some minimum threshold for each attribute beneath which a person might be impossible to work with no matter what the situation. But too often those minimum thresholds are set MUCH TOO HIGH and not specifically tailored enough to the individual.

By focusing on “areas of improvement”, we’re putting a square peg in a round hole. What do we end up with? A crappy, rounded off peg who meets the minimum thresholds at the expense of their most kick-ass attributes. What if let ourselves (and those we manage) spend a lot more energy in the areas where we are–or could be–amazing? I suggest taking a very hard look at the “areas of improvement” list and see if we can rearrange the context so that those things become less important. In other words, why don’t we try to make a square hole?

The comments to the post are also worth reading. I don’t seem to be able to directly link to any single post, but there’s an excellent one that is in the form of a memo about the manager’s responsibilities that was really good,

Functions of your manager

In support of the above goals, your manager will assist in the following ways:

1) Eliminating Assholes. If anyone or anything is standing in the way of you meeting your objectives, please seek assistance to get the obstacle cleared. It is his role to absorb uncertainty and to provide the environment where you can deliver your projects unhindered. We want you to enjoy your work and to be proud of your achievements.

2) Your manager will do his best to provide an environment where you are learning (and helping the company learn) every day. Requests for training are welcome. Sharing of ideas and distribution of your learnings to your manager and your colleagues, ideally in small digestable chunks, is encouraged. And you are expected to make mistakes. That’s the way we all learn.

3) Seek forgiveness, not permission. In the same way you can escalate issues to your manager, there will be times when the data, or key staff, aren’t available for us to hit a key decision deadline. Time to market is key; having weighed up the pros and cons, make the decision that you believe is right for the company, our customers and preferably both.