Tony Robbins Speaks at Stan Tookie Williams Funeral

So the state of California went ahead an executed Stan Tookie Williams. As an opponent of capital punishment I wish that California would outlaw the death penalty, but at least Tookie’s death answered one pressing question — exactly what would I have to do to get motivational speaker Tony Robbins to show up and say a few words at my funeral.

Since Robbins showed up at Tookie’s funeral, apparently all I have to do is brutally five or six people. Robbins showed up at Tookie’s funeral saying that he was filled with “so much rage and so much anger” at the gang leader’s death. In fact, Tookie seems to have revolutionized Robbins’ approach to motivational speaking. Once upon a time, Robbins used firewalking gimmicks to motivate people. But today, Robbins says, we should look to convicted murderers for inspiration. Robbins interviewed Tookie shortly before the killer’s death, and Robbins’ website says of the interview (emphasis added),

During this two-hour interview, taped after Tony’s recent visit to San Quentin State Prison, learn how Mr. Williams committed his life to daily acts of redemption, leveraging his past to create a better future.
Mr. Williams’ story of personal growth will help guide and inspire you to work toward your own healthier and more successful future.

Here I thought affirmations and a positive mental attitude were the keys to success when really I should have been focused on killing my way to the top of an organized crime outfit.

Robbins’ next book? Everything I Needed to Know I Learned from Tony Montana.

Finally, in my previous piece on Williams I made much of the fact that he was the founder of the L.A. street gang the Crips, but that appears to have been untrue.

Both this Reuters article and this LA Weekly piece convincingly argue that Raymond Washington founded the crips, not Williams. Washington was killed in 1979.

Although Williams repeatedly claimed to have founded the Crips, the gang was apparently already well-established before Williams became involved with it. For example, CNN quotes LA County Sheriff’s Sgt. Wes McBride as saying,

The Crips were already well established when Tookie came on the scene. [That he created the Crips] is part of his mystique that his supporters are using to try to get him commuted. It gives him a stature as an anti-hero kind of person that has now turned his life around.

But it also goes to the heart of Williams’ claim to have truly changed. Why would someone who had truly reformed want to take credit for criminal activity he had no part of? On the one hand, Williams insists that he had nothing to do with all those murders he was convicted of, but on the other hand he openly takes credit for criminal activity he apparently had nothing to do with. That’s the mark of an insincere manipulator, not someone whose truly turned his back on his past.

Sources:

Hundreds gather for Tookie Williams’ Funeral. Associated Press, December 20, 2005.

Williams claim of founding Crips is disputed. Reuters, December 12, 2005.

Tookie’s Mistaken Identity. Michael Krikorian, LA Weekly, June 2004.

Escher vs. Star Wars Lego Projects

Just a couple of awesome Lego projects here. First, <a href=”http://www.truerwords.net”>Seth Dillingham</a> sent me a link to <a href=”http://www.simons-rock.edu/~patrick/images/escherlego.jpg”>this awesome Lego recreation</a> of a famous work of MC Escher’s,

<img src=”|images|2005_12_20_escher_lego.jpg”>

How do you top that? Well, I’m not sure this tops it, but <a href=”http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6022866702″>this E-Bay auction</a> of Republic Attack Cruiser comes close,

<img src=”|images|2005_12_20_star_wars_lego.jpg”>

That’s more than 8 feet long folks, built from more than 35,000 pieces by Erik Varszegi (pictured posing with the model above). Some lucky bidder paid $31,602 for the Lego model, including certificate of authenticity signed by George Lucas. The proceeds were donated to Habitat for Humanity’s hurricane relief efforts.

Netgear’s Networked Storage Enclosure

I’ve been wanting to add some network storage to my home LAN for awhile and the price was finally right on Netgear’s SC101 Ethernet Disk enclosure. After using it for a couple weeks, I can say this is a very low-end solution that works (at least for Windows PCs) and is appropriate for some, but not all, home-based networked storage solutions.

The enclosure itself is tiny and looks like someone miniaturized a toaster. It is also fanless, relying on heat sinks mounted on the top and bottom of the unit to keep it cool.

The enclosure has room for two hard drives. Installation was a breeze — simply pop off the front cover with a coin, slide the hard drive in and connect the ends of the parallel cable and power supply to the hard drive. I installed a Maxtor 7200 RPM 250gb hard drive. So far I haven’t noticed any problems with heat, but that could change once I install a second one. Forum postings at Netgear’s site suggest that 5200 RPM drives might be a better bet for keeping the device cool thing cool.

Installing the device brings up the first problem. This is not a true NAS device, but rather requires any computers that want to use it to install a special driver. Moreover, the device ships only with drivers for Windows machines. Supposedly a Mac driver is on its way, and there’s no option as far as I can tell for accessing this from a Linux box.

The use of the special driver also means that the device cannot be accessed directly by devices that like the Slim Squeezebox MP3 player.

Along with those problems, this device is extremely slow. In most reviews I could find online, the Netgear SC101 comes in as the slowest of the home-based NAS setups. I copied 160gb of MP3s I had on various hard drives over to the SC101 and it took almost 15-18 hours.

On the other hand, it works great for what I wanted — a networked box I could stick all my MP3s so that all the computers in the house can access them. I installed the drivers on several PCs, and all of them worked great simultaneously playing different songs off the device. I’m probably going to add a second device and add all my digital photographs there so those can be accessed across the network as well (currently they’re all stuck on a USB HD connected to my PC).

For those sort of uses, the SC101 is a cheap, adequate solution for making data available across a home network. For anything beyond that, the device is simply far too slow. I had hoped, for example, to use the device to host some of the work files that I want to access from a number of computers, but it is far too slow for that.

NYT Interview with Michael Rose

The New York Times’ Claudia Dreifus recently interviewed longevity researcher Michael Rose. In the 1970s Rose managed to extend the average lifespan of fruit flies by forcing them to breed at relatively old ages, thereby providing a selection event for longer life (since only older fruit flies would be able to reproduce in this experiment).

In response to a question from Dreifus, Rose explains why longevity research should embrace an evolutionary biology perspective,

Because the common assumption is that young bodies work and then they fall apart during aging. Young bodies only work because natural selection makes them healthy enough to survive and breed.

As adults get older, natural selection stops caring about them, so we lose its benefits and our health. If you don’t understand this, aging research is an unending riddle that goes around in circles.

The problem, of course, is that fruit flies live very short lives, and extending lifespan this way with other animals is not quite so easy (Rose notes that the increasing age at which women give birth in the West could eventually have the same effect, but that it would take centuries to see any significant effect).

Because of his evolutionary perspective on longevity, it was not surprising to read that Rose believes there is no high end limit on how far human longevity can be extended, but I was surprised to see that Rose expects significant life extension technologies in a relatively short time period,

There’s not going to be one magic bullet where you take one pill or manipulate one gene and get to live to 500. But you could take a first step, and then another so that in 50 years’ time, people take 50 or 60 pills and they live to be 200.

Leaving aside F.D.A. approval, it looks like we are about 5 to 10 years away from therapies that would add years to our present life span. For now, pharmaceuticals will be the primary anti-aging therapy.

After another 10 years or so, the implantation of cultured tissues will become common — especially skin and connective tissues. Reconstructive surgery is certain to become more effective than it is today.

Eventually, we will be able to culture replacement organs from our own cells and repair damage using nanotech machines. All of this will increase life span.

I’d also like the “play cornerback like Deion Sanders” nanomachines, but that’s just me.

Source:

Live Longer With Evolution? Evidence May Lie in Fruit Flies. Claudia Dreifus, New York times, December 6, 2005.

Ultarama An Excellent Solution for Displaying Action Figures

Over the past few years, my action figure collection has grown significantly, while my space to display them has declined. My wife and I have reached an uneasy true on the matter — the house we bought earlier this year has a walled-off finished area in the basement which makes a small 226 square-foot office in which I can stuff all the action figures, legos, and computers I can fit there.

Since I am not the sort of collector who keeps toys mint-in-box, I needed some way to display the action figures in a way that wouldn’t have them all falling over the second my three year old collided into the display.

The solution proved to be Ultarama displays. I’d heard about these several years ago but never really had the place to properly display them, much less purchase them. A few weeks ago, though, I bit the bullet and ordered a couple.

You can see the results in this picture,

I’m in the process of lining two walls with 48″ black bookcases. The displays here sit on top of those bookcases.

On the left is my collection of Teen Titans 3 1/2″ figures,

On the right is my collection of Marvel Legends 6″+ figures (the tall figure on the left below is an 18″ Galactus figure assembled from parts included in the recent Galactus Marvel Legends series),

Each set of Ultarama displays set me back $35.90 after shipping and handling and included all the parts needed to make each double-decker section. The floor of each section is littered with peg holes, and the display ships with dozens of pegs for both 3 1/2″ and 6″ action figure sizes.

I’ve got each display configured in a double-decker version, but these can be stacked up to 6 levels high total. I’ve only got room for a 4-level setup before I hit the ceiling, and I am definitely going to add enough to expand each of these to 4-levels (I’ve got 6″ Teen Titans based on the comic that I’m going to put on top of the 3 1/2″ Teen Titans, for example). By the time I’m done, I’ll end up with about six 4-tiered displays, or enough room to display hundreds of action figures in a minimal amount of space.

The only potential drawbacks to Ultarama are the price and some issues with the pegs.

On the price point, putting together my desired six 4-tiered displays is about $450. That’s a lot of money, but on the other hand its hard to buy a single decent glassed-in display case at that price (which I had also considered).

A bigger problem, which is nothing that Ultarama can control, is that peg sizes vary wildly even among identical lines of action figures. There were several slight variations in size of peg holes at the bottom of the figures even within the Galactus Marvel Legends figures, for example. Moreover, quite a few of the figures I own do not have any holes at all which means at some point we’ll have “Adventures In Drilling” at my house (most of the Buffy and Justice League Unlimited figures, for example, lack such holes). In the 3 1/2″ Teen Titan figures, the 3 1/2″ pegs supplied by Ultarama were really not big enough to fit snugly into the holes of the action figures, though they still provide significantly more support than when the figures are simply freestanding.

Richard Pryor Was No MS Hero

Richard Pryor died this month after a long battle with multiple sclerosis. MS is stilly poorly understood, but according to the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, it is believed to be an autoimmune disorder that causes the body to attack the myelin protecting nerve fibers.

Almost every piece written on Pryor’s death noted his long struggle with the disease. The National Multiple Sclerosis Society noted on its website, for example, that Pryor “will be remembered for his courage and dignity” in facing his disease.

But in discussing his years of suffering from MS, it should not be forgotten that Pryor also fought to extend the suffering of those with multiple sclerosis and supporter groups who engage in extremist tactics against medical researchers attempting to better understand MS.

Pryor repeatedly lent his name to People for the Ethical Treatment of the Animals’ anti-research campaigns, urging people not to donate to charities that fund animal research into MS.

That was bad enough, but in 2004 Pryor and his wife Jennifer Lee lent their public support to Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty, an animal rights group that openly harasses and attempts to intimidate medical researchers. Moreover, Pryor and his wife only stepped forward to endorse SHAC after several key members of the group were indicted on federal charges including conspiracy to terrorize, interstate stalking and related charges.

Call me callous, but I don’t define “courage and dignity” to include supporting groups who openly try to terrorize and intimidate the very people trying to find treatments for this horrible disease.

It Takes A Village (Idiot)

Probably the funniest thing I’ve read in the last 15 minutes is this piece by Andrew Orlowski attacking Wikipedia. Wikipedia is certainly right there at the bottom of trustworthy sites, but one of the few things I’d trust less than a Wikipedia article is anything written by Orlowski.

Between them, Orlowski and Wikipedia demonstrate that idiocy is just as well at home in large groups as it is in lone crusaders.

On the Wikipedia side, the case of John Seigenthaler has brought Wikipedia’s inherent problems to the forefront. Seigenthaler was the assistant to Attorney General Robert Kennedy. As a joke (which pretty much sums up Wikipedia right there), someone edited the Wikipedia entry on Seigenthaler to accuse him of having a suspected role in the Kennedy assassinations. Contrary to Wikipedia defenders who claim the sites public editing process means errors get corrected quickly, this libelous claim was allowed to stay on the site for months before someone alerted Seigenthaler to it. The person who posted the bogus article has since come forth and been fired resigned as a result (he apparently edited the entry at work to make a point to a co-worker).

So Wikipedia is largely untrustworthy garbage — that was apparent long before the recent controversy. But most traditional media and online media outlets that allegedly have editors are no better, and nothing illustrates that point better than The Register’s Andrew Orlowski who has repeated published some of the most inane, inaccurate and downright bizarre pieces to grace a semi-legitimate online publication.

Just how bad is Orlowski’s “journalism”? Consider a November 2004 article in which Orlowski treated readers to the fact that Google returned garbage results for searches even on famous historical events such as the Battle at Guadalcanal. The only problem was that Orlowski and his source, Scott Middleton, apparently thought that Guadalcanal referred to a battle at a canal, and so were searching Google for “Guadal Canal” (Guadalcanal is, in fact, named after a Spanish village, which in turn takes its name from an Arabic word).

Not searching on the correct term, they ran into pages set up by other people who had a similar problem in correctly identifying the name of the battle.

Orlowski is the epitome of the sort of lousy tech writers whose only skill is jumping from one bandwagon to the next. For example, on June 4, 2004, he hyped an Apple software saying,” Apple today cemented its position as the smartphone’s best friend.” Less than 24 hours later, however, Orlowski bemoaned that “Apple’s iSync software needs a health warning: use at your peril” and complains the software suffers from errors that should have been caught in Beta testing — this from someone who, himself, couldn’t be bothered to give the software a legitimate evaluation before hyping it in The Register.

Frankly, everytime I run across a completely inaccurate Wikipedia entry, part of me wonders, “Did Orlowski write this?” Certainly the bulk of what’s in Wikipedia is no better or worse than what appears on a daily basis in The Register.

Why PK-ing Is So Much Fun in MMORPGs (Or Pretty Much Any Other Game)

Where were classes like this when I was an undergraduate? I remember writing a 100-page analysis of George McClellan’s footdragging, not spending time on MUDs (the closest equivalent at the time) and writing “ethnographic analyses.” But I’m not bitter.

Anyway, for a communications class an instructor had her students write ethnographic studies of World of Warcraft. The resulting papers and student weblogs can be found here. The papers range from the utterly ridiculous to the insightful. The paper I found most interesting was the student who covered the issue of player-killing.

The World of Warcraft game has dozens of servers. When you’ve logged on with your account you can create a character on any of the servers. At least with the group of people I play with, we tend to just pick a server and create characters there. You can only play one character at a time, so while I’ve got three characters on the Stormscale server, only one of them can be active and playing at any one time.

There are two types of servers to pick from when it comes to player killing. The most numerous is the basic Player-vs-Environment server. On this server the main focus of the game is killing mobs, finishing quests, etc. You can definitely do player killing in this game, but for the most part you either a) have to do it in a special area set up for PVP play, or b) the other players in the area have to explicitly opt-in to PVP play by selecting an option that makes it possible for them to kill or be killed for the next 5 minutes.

The other type is the PVP server. On a PVP server, most of the areas of the world except for some low-level beginning areas are open killing fields. If you’re trying to complete a quest and someone of the opposite faction comes along and decides to attack you, they can do so at any time (and vice versa). Moreover, there’s no penalty (though also no in-game benefit) for players of very high level killing players of very low level.

In WoW, there are two basic factions, the Horde (undead, orcs, etc.) and the Alliance (human, elves, gnomes, etc.) Players are either on one side or the other — I only play Alliance characters.

I play on Stormscale which is on a PVP server — and I couldn’t imagine playing on a PVE server. Moreover, I pretty much try to kill every player I come across where I might actually have a chance to do so. So if I’m just riding through Alterac Valley and see some 18th level player who only has half his health points left? I’ll dismount and send my level 50 Warlock after him to finish the job.

There is also the group PVP-ing, like getting a large group together to go raid a nearby Horde village or town, which might end up with 20 Horde vs. 20 Alliance (or more) in an hours-long back-and-forth battle.

Of course the other side is that this also happens quite a bit to me — I’ll be questing with my wife when some level 60 rogue comes along and wipes us out before we’ve even had a chance to figure out where the attack is coming from. After awhile though, you learn to adapt, and customize your character and your strategy to the constant PVP action.

There are also the folks who try to do something other than PVP, even on a PVP server. As Aaron Delwiche’s paper notes, some players will try to wave, smile or even dance as a sign of “lets not fight … at least for now.” Again, the way I play is that if the person waving is too high to kill anyway, then fine we can play nice. But if I think I’ve got a chance to kill him, then a wave pretty much means, “hey, come over here and try to kill me.”

There is also some debate in the forums about things like ganking (attacking a player while he’s already fighting a mob — and likely has less health points, etc). and other tactics. Occasionally people in the forums complain that such fights aren’t fair. As far as I’m concerned, though, the last thing I want is a fair fight. If someone else wants to play all chivalrous, more power to them, but my goal is to win in PVP encounters and typically the best way to win at any fight is to have an overwhelming advantage.

There is also the meta-criticism hinted at in Delwiche’s paper of the “can’t we all just get along” variety. The WoW beta and even the version launched in November 2004 had some features that allowed players of different factions to communicate. Those have all been removed. Anything, in fact, that might make it easy for co-op play between factions within the game has been removed. Delwiche and others seem to see this as a defect of the game, and are interested in the few attempts to do cross-faction cooperative gameplay.

This criticism might make sense if WoW was the only game of its kind, but there are always games like Second Life if you want to play UN Peacekeeper. These sort of analyses make about as much sense as discussing why American football gives the player so many tools to committ acts of violence against the opposing side, but such few tools for opposing factions to get together at the 50 yard line and just play catch with the ball.

There’s Actually Something for Sale at This Site

For something like 3 or 4 years the “Store” tab up there has had a “Under construction”-type message, but as of today there’s actually something for sale there. Its all pretty much World of Warcraft-inspired t-shirts (my wife’s been going crazy with slogans and t-shirt ideas; I keep telling her she should have been a copywriter).

Get ‘em now before Blizzard sends us a cease-and-desist notice!