Passion of the Christ and Matthew 27

I think I’m going to wait to see “The Passion of the Christ” on DVD so I can get the extra 15 minutes director’s cut of the scourging scenes. Anyway, I read a handful of reviews making the same criticism of the movie that goes something like this — Gibson’s film portrays the Jewish priests as the prime movers behind Jesus’ death and portrays Pontius Pilate as a passive, if not helpless, actor in the whole affair.

I haven’t seen the movie so I have no idea if this is an accurate summary of the film, but I’d really like to know how this could possibly be construed as a criticism of Gibson’s film. Haven’t these reviewers read Matthew 27?

15 Now at that feast the governor was wont to release unto the people a prisoner, whom they would.
16 And they had then a notable prisoner, called Barabbas.
17 Therefore when they were gathered together, Pilate said unto them, Whom will ye that I release unto you? Barabbas, or Jesus which is called Christ?
18 For he knew that for envy they had delivered him.
19 When he was set down on the judgment seat, his wife sent unto him, saying, Have thou nothing to do with that just man: for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of him.
20 But the chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus.
21 The governor answered and said unto them, Whether of the twain will ye that I release unto you? They said, Barabbas.
22 Pilate saith unto them, What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ? They all say unto him, Let him be crucified.
23 And the governor said, Why, what evil hath he done? But they cried out the more, saying, Let him be crucified.
24 When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.

WiFi IPAQ 4155

Recently I bought an IPAQ 4155 and have putting it through the paces. The main thing I was looking for was a form factor that was similar to the IPAQ 1910 I’d been using (i.e., very small and lightweight), but with built-in WiFi, a 400 Xscale processor, and a standard synch connector (HP used a non-standard synch interface in the 1910 so it wasn’t compatible with other IPAQ peripherals such as external keyboards).

There’s a small, but annoying problem with the diffuser in the unit I received and I’ll have to ship it back to HP at some point for repair (the last couple row of pixels on the bottom of the screen are darker than they should be).

I had little problem moving all of my data from my 1910 to the new unit, got an external keyboard which works great as well, and have generally enjoyed the upgrade.

Except for the WiFi, that is. Bottom line — it’s amazing just how poor the bundled utilities for configuring and managing WiFi connections are. It’s not complicated enough that I can’t manage to connect, disconnect and reconnect to networks as I move from place to place, but there’s no way I could give my wife one of these and have her accomplish the same thing.

Yahoo! to Compete with Google by Neutering Its Search Engine for Fun and Profit

The reason that Google dominates today as the search engine of choice is that, so far, Google has managed to avoid making the sort of bone-headed decisions that competitors like Yahoo! have. According to the New York Times, for example, Yahoo! has decided to go with a pay-for-listing scheme for its new search service that is supposed to compete with Google. Now this may be great for Yahoo!’s bottom line — temporarily at least — and it may be good for some sites that want to be listed, but as an end-user I just want to find what I’m searching for. But according to the New York Times (emphasis added),

Yahoo said yesterday that it would start charging companies that want to ensure that their Web sites are included in its Web index from which research results are selected.

. . .

Yahoo will update its index of paying clients every two days, while it may update its listing of other sites once a month. And Yahoo will give paying clients detailed reports on when its users click on their sites and will help those sites improve their listings.

Let me see if I’ve got this straight. Google currently appears to update a large number of its sites every few days — I know that when I post something at AnimalRights.Net, it usually appears in Google’s index about 72 hours later. Yahoo!, however, will only keep sites that current if they pay up front for the service. So, for a mind boggling large number of sites, Google is always going to have more recent information in its index than Yahoo!

Would somebody at Yahoo! explain to me again why I would want to use their intentionally neutered search engine?

Source:

Yahoo to Charge for Guaranteeing a Spot on Its Index. Saul Hansell, The New York Times, March 2, 2004.

BlogBinders.Com

BlogBinders.Com is a service that will convert your blog — or whatever part of it you’d prefer — into a bound book. But I’m not sure they’ve really thought out their service very well. For example, they start by scraping your blog but,

Blogbinders application strips out any images and HTML formatting at this point, so you are left with the basic written text from your blog entries.

Ah, yes … scraping my blog and removing all those pesky <blockquote> tags (like the one used to format the paragraph above) would really make it a lot more readable. Not.