Zanzibar Embraces Mobile Phones

The BBC reported in August that Zanzibar is the latest developing country to take advantage of cellular phones to route around unreliable, expensive state-run phone systems.

According to BBC reporter Daniel Dickinson, Zanzibar cell phone company Zantel has enrolled 45,000 subscribers.

As in other countries, cellular phones may have their drawbacks, including expense, but they are often hands down better than the monopoly land-line companies.

According to the BBC, it can take 4-5 years to obtain a landline in Zanzibar, and generally only the wealthy have the resources to navigate their way through the red tape and bureaucracy.

Other developing nations are turning to Internet-based protocols for voice communications to route around the obstacles thrown up by traditional telephone carriers in their country.

If these nations would just learn to free their most important resource — their people — to solve problem in a market setting, they wouldn’t be “developing” for long.

Source:

Zanzibar’s mobile revolution. Daniel Dickinson, The BBC, August 12, 2003.

CNN Plants Questions at Debate

Although I am still not much of a fan of Fox News, one of the things that is admirable about the network is its spontaneity. On CNN or MSNBC, frankly you pretty much know what the talking head is going to say next. This is in marked contrast to Fox News which, at least to me, seems far more free wheeling.

Apparently CNN takes it scripted appearance very seriously, going so far as to plant questions in a presidential candidate debate (and make an apparently smart young woman look like an airhead),

Alexandra Trustman said yesterday that a CNN producer called her on the morning of the Boston forum and suggested she ask about the Democratic presidential candidates’ computer preferences. Puzzled by the request, she writes in Brown University’s Daily Herald, she drafted a more complicated question about how the candidates would use technology.

But in Boston, Trustman said, she was handed a notecard with the digital-age equivalent of the boxers-or-briefs choice put to Bill Clinton. She wrote that she told the producer “I didn’t see the question’s relevance,” but that he rejected her proposed query “because it wasn’t light-hearted enough and they wanted to modulate the event with various types of questions.”

Source:

‘Light’ Not Quite Right for This Forum. Howard Kurtz, Washington Post, November 11, 2003.

McStupid

So McDonald’s does not want people to use the term “McJobs” to refer to low end, menial jobs that have little chance for advancement. Well, of course, what better way to make sure people don’t use the term than to issue press releases and make statements so that every news media outlet around reports on the controversy over the word.

Maybe what McDonald’s needs is a new public relations McStrategy.

Technology to Make Farming More Profitable? Not Likely

The Associated Press reported back in May on technological advances in farming that would supposedly help make farming more profitable. Any and all technological advances in farming are certainly welcome, but the effect of such innovations has historically been — and will certainly continue to be — to make farming less rather than more profitable in the long term.

The technology being highlighted by the AP is precision agriculture and described the experiences of farmers using global positioning systems and computers to “evaluate the field’s fertility on an almost row-by-row basis.”

That sort of incredibly detailed information is then used to automate exactly what crops are planted, how much fertilizer they receive, etc. This sort of technology is still in the early stages, but eventually the result will be higher yields at lower costs which will be good for everyone.

Well, everyone except for farmers. If successful, the higher yields and lower costs will soon attract other farmers and pretty soon the price farm commodities will experience price pressure from competition. Consumers win, the number of hungry people in the world will decline, but farmers will be stuck in the sort of technological arms race that has been going on for literally thousands of years.

They don’t call them commodities for nothing.

Source:

Technology could make farming more profitable. Associated Press, May 12, 2003.

World Trade Organization Brokers Deal to Provide Cheap Generic Drugs

In August, the World Trade Organization brokered a final deal to bring cheaper generic drugs to the developing world. Poverty in developing countries makes it difficult for individuals and governments there to afford expensive medications that fight diseases such as AIDS.

Under World Trade Organization rules, developing countries could produce generic drugs for domestic consumption, but could not export or import such generics. The new WTO agreement allows developing countries to import generic drugs produced in other countries provided that it is done to “protect public health” rather than for commercial exploitation.

The pact also requires developing countries to take steps to ensure that such generics are not smuggled into developed countries. Generics produced for developing countries, for example, will have to be packaged differently or be of a different color or shape than the non-generics sold in the developed world.

Sources:

WTO gives final approval to cheap drugs deal. Associated Press, August 30, 2003.

World Trade Organization finally agrees cheap drugs deal. Fiona Fleck, British Medical Journal, 2003;327:517 (6 September).

Researchers Discover How Anti-Malaria Drug Works

For centuries people in China have used extracts from a plant called Sweet Wormwood to treat malaria. In August, British researchers published the results of their research outlining exactly how these drugs, known as artemisinins, work.

The prevailing hypothesis had been that artemisinins interfered molecules that the malaria parasite uses to consume haemoglobin. But the British researchers at St. George’s Hospital in London discovered that artemisinins in fact appear to disable part of the parasite that transfers calcium out of cells in order to stabilize calcium levels. With this disabled, calcium levels in the cells of the parasite grow until the cell dies.

Unlike other treatments for malaria, there is no known malarial resistance to artemisinins, raising the possibility that other drugs and vaccines could be developed that also target this calcium transfer mechanism.

Researcher Sanjreev Krishna told the BBC and Reuters,

It’ll take some time to apply our findings, or even to test new artemisinin derivatives which are being developed now. But you can be sure that’s what we’re going to be doing.

. . .

So far there is no evidence at all of any clinical resistance to artemisinins. It’s one of our best hopes for the future and frankly I don’t think we have many other options at the moment.

Sources:

Find could boost malaria fight. The BBC, August 20, 2003.

Scientists find how anti-malaria shrub works. Reuters, August 20, 2003.

Artemisinins target the SERCA of Plasmodium falciparum. U. Eckstein-Ludwig, Nature 424, 957 – 961, 21 August 2003.