PETA Tries to Ride SARS Fears

At the height of concern of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals sent four activists to Sahar International Airport in India to urge people to stop eating meat in order to prevent future disease outbreaks (see the photo to the right that ran in the Indian newspaper, The Hindu).

PETA’s Bijal Vachharajani told Mumbai Newsline,

In response to news reports that the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) epidemic now spreading across the globe probably originated on a pig farm, PETA is offering ?simple but effective? advice about how to prevent this and other life-threatening diseases like heart attacks and cancer: Leave the animals alone and stop eating meat.

. . .

No more meat means no more factory farms and no more outbreaks of diseases spread by intensively-raised animals.

Source:

No pigs for PETA, but at the airport, nobody cares. Mumbai Newsline, April 23, 2003.

Putting It All Together — Fun With Conversant

I’m still amazed some days at just how much can be accomplished in Conversant. The basic tools are provided, and you can mix and match them to do some awesome things.

For example, check out my demo of a system I’ve been working on to make it easier to navigate and reference certain kinds of documents (specifically, in my case, e-texts, though it could be used for pretty much everything).

This was inspired by (and much of it stolen from) Steve Ivy’s efforts with a speech by Colin Powell back in February. Each paragraph there has a named anchor, and at the end of the paragraph is a link to that anchor so that it is easy for anyone to reference a specific paragraph. Ivy also uses a bit of Javascript written by Seth Dillingham so that if you are viewing an anchored paragraph, that paragraph is highlighted. Very cool.

What I wanted to do was that, but I wanted a way to turn the anchor links at the end of the paragraphs on or off. I like having the links for reference, but they distract from the text if I’m just reading for content or want to print.

And so, on the Preface to Frederick Douglass’ “My Bondage, My Freedom” you’ll see a link in the right-hand column that reads “Show Permalinks.” Click it, and you’ll be shown a version of the page like Ivy’s, with the link at the bottom. Of course now the link in the right-hand column reads “Hide Permalinks.” Click it, and you see the version of the page without the visible links (though the named anchors are still in the page). This is done via Cookie’s, so if you prefer, you can always see one or the other or switch on the fly as you need. (Note: this probably won’t work in IE at the moment, but will after I do a quick updated later — use Mozilla or some browser other than IE to get the full effect).

Have it your way!

So here’s a brief look at what’s going on behind the scenes:

1. First, the page checks to see whether or not you’ve got this specific cookie set to true. If so, you are served the version with the permalinks visible. Otherwise, the web server passes along the clean version.

2. Second, the system checks to see whether or not I’ve designated this particular article as an E-text or not. If I have, it shows the Show/Hide link on the right. This way I can distribute this feature throughout all of my E-text pages while only having to use a single small snippet of HTML.

3. When you click on the Show/Hide link, you are directed to a page which simply sets a cookie and then redirects you back to whatever page sent you there. Again, this way two HTML snippets handle requests from an unlimited number of pages.

4. And, I am also using Seth’s hilighting Javascript. This also uses a conditional macro, so the page checks to see if this is an E-text page. If it is, it inserts the Javascript in the header area, otherwise it goes on to other things.

And it does all of this blindingly fast. Yes, this is running on a pretty fast machine after the recent upgrade, but consider that depending on the user, just loading the Preface there easily involves more than a dozen conditional macros that look for one state or another to decide how to proceed.

I think I’m going to sit back and let all of this power go to my head!

Is the Weather Channel Appropriate for Children?

This morning I was reading yet another pointless article by John Dvorak, this time about the horrors of realistic videogame violence. As computer and videogame graphics get more realistic, Dvorak wonders,

My concern is for the mental health of the game players after years of being subjected to visual images that are just plain disturbing. Game technologies are improving the graphics to such an extreme that what was once a cartoonish image is now a photorealistic nightmare. That can’t be good.

Translation: when I was a kid, we didn’t have them fancy computer graphics.

But the interesting thing is watching my daughter grow up and how she handles violent media (which is impossible to avoid, even if we wanted to). We watch a lot of Buffy: The Vampire Slayer at my house, and initially I was worried that the show would be too scary for a 6 year old, but she seems to get off on the strong female character kicking butt. Never had a nightmare nor does she act out the violence — she seems to have a good grasp of the difference between make believe and real life (and obviously, Buffy’s about on the outer limits of what we’ll let her watch).

The thing that gives her nightmares and sends her into fit is the one channel that I never even thought about — the Weather Channel.

One night my wife left the TV on the weather channel, and the next morning Emma got up long before any human has the right to and switched on the TV. That was the day, unfortunately, that there were those flurry of tornadoes, including one that hit Tennessee where here aunt lives.

Now she pretty much is obsessed by the weather channel as well as completely freaked out by the slightest indication of a storm. A couple weeks ago my wife and Emma were out planting flowers. That evening it started to rain and we had some lightning. Emma woke me up around 2 a.m. to suggest very urgently that we needed to bring the plants inside so they wouldn’t get hit by lightning.

She’s a bit behind in her reading skills due to her ADHD, but she will proudly come in and tell me that the Weather Channel just said today is going to be partly cloudy (of course that was as likely for Montana as for Michigan).

So, like Dvorak I’m concerned about the long-term effect of hyper-realistic images on my child. But in my case, it’s Doppler radar images rather than monsters that is my big concern.

Polio Cases Increase Thanks Largely to Indian Outbreak

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in April that cases of polio worldwide increased four-fold in 2002 due largely to an outbreak of the disease in India.

In 2001 there were only 483 confirmed cases of polio which shot up to 1,920 confirmed cases in polio after an outbreak in the Indian states of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. That was the single worst outbreak of the disease since the World Health Organization began its campaign to eradicate polio in 1988. Cases from the Indian outbreak constituted 71 percent of all polio cases in 2002.

Afghanistan, Egypt, Niger, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Somalia also reported cases of polio in 2002.

Source:

Polio cases on the increase. The BBC, April 25, 2003.

United Nations Pushes Schooling for Girls

The BBC reported in April that Kofi Annan and the United Nations were urging nations, especially in the developing world, to make more of an effort to educate girls.

In the developed world, rates of schooling at primary and secondary levels are almost identical by sex. But in sub-Saharan Africa, for example, only 60 percent of girls attend school and worldwide the Global Campaign for Education claims that 65 million girls never attend school. Moreover, the GCE claims that two-thirds of the worlds almost 900 million illiterate adults are women.

As Annan points out, the cost of not educating girls is an expense that developing nations cannot afford,

If we are to succeed in our efforts to build a more healthy, peaceful and equitable world, the classrooms of the world have to be full of girls as well as boys. Every year of schooling completed by them will be a step towards eradicating poverty and disease.

. . .

Study after study has taught us that there is no tool for development more effective than the education of girls. No other policy is likely to raise economic productivity, lower infant and maternal mortality, improve nutrition and promote health, including the prevention of HIV/AIDS.

The BBC notes that the World Bank has set a goal to achieve sexual equality in schooling by 2005, which is one of those goals which will not come close to being met.

Source:

Annan plea for girls’ schooling. The BBC, April 8, 2003.

Why Africa Starves

On April 9, 2003, two separate news stories appeared on the United Nations Integrated Regional INformation Networks which really summed up everything that is currently wrong with Africa. Both stories concerned events in Swaziland and the dueling headlines went like this,

Below Normal Harvest Expected

New Attempt to Muzzle the News Media

The first story, of course, dealt with Swaziland’s disastrous hunger situation. With severe crop failure likely, close to 1/3rd of Swaziland’s 1 million population will require food assistance this year to survive. Swaziland national disaster team chairman Ben Nsibandze was quoted by The Swaziland Times as saying,

We see as a result of all this, a poverty, hunger and disease situation that is progressively getting worse, as victims are deprived of all their coping mechanisms. We see the Swazi extended family structure collapsing as a result of family members failing to take care of their [HIV] infected and affected relatives. We see an increase in child-headed families, large numbers of orphans cared for by elderly and sometimes destitute grandparents, chronic malnutrition, children being taken out of school because of the absence of financial means to support them.

The obvious way to alleviate that sort of situation, of course, is censorship. Under new laws announced by Swaziland’s Minister of Information Abednego Ntshangase, state-owned media would be even further censored. Ntshangase told Swaziland’s legislature,

The national television and radio stations are not going to cover anything that has a negative bearing on government . . . This is not to say that the issues some describe as controversial will be untold. Statements on these will be released by the prime minister’s office.

Ah yes, all the news the government deems fit to report. The UNIRIN quoted an unnamed source as saying,

In fact, we are worried that stories like the food shortage will be censored from the national news, because it showed government was unprepared, and it raised questions about government land policy. Government holds a monopoly on radio and TV in the kingdom, so if the news is censored, most people will be uninformed about matters that affect their lives.

Illiberalism and starvation walking hand and hand in Africa yet again.

Sources:

New attempt to muzzle the news media. UN Integrated Regional Information Networks, April 9, 2003.

Below normal harvest expected. UN Integrated Regional Information Networks, April 9, 2003.