Who Does Watch Bravo?

Timothy Campbell sent me a link to his weblog, !? because he and I share some interests in skeptical-related stuff, but his comments on Bravo had me laughing out loud at work. Campbell highlights this listing of a program appearing on Bravo,

Conflicting Emotions: Conflicts that surround schizophrenia are interpreted through dance.

And Campbell asks the obvious question — who is watching this stuff?

The only good thing I can say about Bravo is that where I live we don’t have a WB affiliate so the cable company hijacks Bravo’s channel every night to show WB programming so I can get my fill of “Angel” and “Smallville.”

Hmmm…maybe I’ll do an interpretive dance about how much I appreciate that.

Bruce Friedrich Spins Support for Animal Rights Terrorism

The Associated Press ran a story in February about People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals’ support for animal rights terrorism. The story centered around the Center for Consumer Freedom’s excellent work documenting PETA’s financial support for terrorist groups, including its donation to the Earth Liberation Front.

It is interesting to look at how PETA presents itself to the public when talking to reporters for articles like this compared to what it says when the audience is mainly other animal rights activists.

The AP reports, for example, that Bruce Friedrich told its reporter that PETA always carries out its activities legally and says of PETA’s critics,

They’re good at coming up with the best smear tactics that (public relations) firms can devise. At the end of the day, what PETA is fighting for is kindness.

But it was Bruce Friedrich who said at Animal Rights 2001 that while he personally doesn’t “blow up stuff,”

. . . I do advocate it, and I think it’s a great way to bring about animal liberation.

It was Friedrich, not the CCF, who revealed his thuggish nature when telling a reporter that PETA would protest at a church pig roast and added that,

I wouldn’t rule out turning over tables.

And, of course, it was Friedrich who wrote an essay several years ago defending the importance of “direct action” activities such as those carried about by the Animal Liberation Front saying,

I have found that Animal Liberation Front activities speak to people, regardless of their belief in animal rights. They “get it.”

. . .

Considering the power of our opposition, can you imagine where we would be without surprise direct actions and the secrecy required for so much of what we do?

Of course if I had repeatedly defended and advocated violence and thuggery, I’d probably not want to mention that to a reporter either and pretend that all PETA does is “fight for kindness” (gee, why didn’t he just throw in a line about defending Mom and apple pie while he was at it?)

Source:

Food industry questions PETA’s backing of violent activists. Associated Press, February 16, 2003.

Is Soya Milk Consumption Linked to Peanut Allergy?

Researchers at the Univerity of Bristol are reporting a possible link between early childhood consumption of soya milk and peanut allergies.

The finding comes as part of a study of 14,000 infants. Of the 49 infants in that sample who had peanut allergies, almost 25 percent hd consumed soya milk in their first two years of life.

Imperial College’s Dr. Gideon Lack told the BBC, “These results suggest that senisitsation to peantu may possibly occur . . . as a result of soya exposure.”

This is, however, obviously a small sample of children with peanut allergies and much more research needs to be done to determine if this is a real effect or simply a statistical artifact.

Source:

Allergy ‘may be linked to soya milk’. The BBC, March 11, 2003.

SHAC Activists Sentenced

The Earth Liberation Prisoners Information Bulletin recently reported that Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty Activist Nathan Brasfield plead guilty to a felony charge of theft of telecommunication services and was sentenced “to just over 12 months imprisonment.”

With time served, Brasfield will likely leave prison sometime in June 2003.

Also, according to the ELP, Jennifer Greenberg and Joshua Schwartz were both sentenced in January to one year in jail for their roles in an April 2002 protest at the home of a Marsh Inc. executive.

Source:

ELP Information Bulletin, March 10, 2003.