Can the Lions Do the Unthinkable? Is a 0-16 Season Possible?

I live about halfway between Chicago and Detroit, but unfortunately because I’m still in Michigan, Fox and CBS always serve up Detroit Lions games if that pathetic excuse for a football team happens to be playing. On the other hand although their games aren’t very fun to watch, there has to be something to an organization that has taken losing to such a high art.

The Detroit Lions are to football what the Los Angeles Clippers are to basketball. It’s kind of like those tabloid psychics — even if they are complete frauds with no special talent whatsoever, you have to believe that sheer chance would occasionally produce some accurate insight or a good team.

But alas, even when the Lions occasionally made the playoffs, they did so with the worst looking playoff teams I’ve ever seen (and usually got blown away in the first round, indicative of the fact that they really didn’t belong there in the first place).

After a typical loss yesterday to the Cincinnati Bengals, the big question in Detroit now is whether or not an 0-16 season is possible. The San Diego Chargers came very close last year, and perhaps the Lions saw that as a challenge they need to rise to meet.

There are only a couple ways the Lions could avert such a disaster. The team is moving to a new stadium next year and is currently in a dispute with the owners of its current stadium, the Pontiac Silverdome, over financial terms of its old lease. As a result the Silverdome owners have refused to allow the Lions to practice in the stadium. Detroit News sports columnist Joe Falls suggests the Silverdome could go a step further and do everyone a favor by refusing to allow the Lions to play their games in the stadium as well.

The other possibility is the very last game of the season against the Dallas Cowboys. Detroit News columnist Mike O’Hara oddly claims that Dallas game is the Lions “only sure victory on the schedule.”

Earth to O’Hara: the Cowboys have actually won two games (that’s two more than the Lions, if you’re keeping track).

As for me, I’m rooting for them to go 0-16. If the team is going to be mediocre for years on end, they might as well try to excel at that. A 2-14 record would be ho hum, but 0-16 — that would be a real accomplishment.

Should Americans Have More Babies for the Fatherland?

Some Islamic extremists claim that the United States is doomed because of our cultural degeneration, best exemplified by the general toleration (if not formal legal sanction) of homosexuality and casual sexual relationships. Conservative author and columnist Maggie Gallagher agrees with much of this analysis, claiming that America’s biggest threat is its own internal cultural problems.

Gallagher writes,

Here is my best guess at honest self-examination: The Achilles’ heel of AmerEuropean civilization is our sexual culture, which even to many Americans looks not only deeply destructive, but ugly. Fatherless children, fragmented families, the demotion of sex into a product — these are the surface symptoms of an even deeper problem: a hollowing out of sexual meaning and purpose.

Sex has no deep-seated meaning, no public purpose beyond providing an enjoyable set of internal physical or emotional sensations. Sex is a consumer good. People who believe this end up having unstable marriages, fragmented families or no families at all.

Clearly social institutions still lag the advent of effective birth control and the ensuing sexual revolution it made possible, but to suggest that American and European civilizations are tottering on the edge of internal collapse is stretching this point into absurdity.

For Gallagher, the transformation of sex ties into another concern of conservative thinkers — the so called “depopulation bomb.” The 20th century saw a massive increase in the world’s population that affected pretty much every country of the world. Toward the end of the 20th century, however, the population of developed countries in Europe began to level off and, in countries such as Spain and Italy, the population actually began to decline. Today, the United States is the only developed nation whose population is still increasing, and a good deal of that increase is due to America’s relatively liberal immigration policies.

But in the developing world, population continues to grow, albeit at rates that continue to slow year by year. Some conservative columnists see an outright disaster in this trend of population decline in the developed world combined with large population increases in the developing world. Gallagher cites historian Paul Johnson who believes that the differing population growth rates of Islamic and Christian countries will inevitably lead to a clash between the two blocs.

Gallagher endorses this position, writing that,

For hundreds of years, traditional Islam has failed to produce a society that is attractive: regimes of secular corruption alternate with regimes of religious repression. But Islam remains a successful civilization because it fulfills the two minimum functions any culture must: It channels intense social energy of individuals into the two great sacrifices of self: war and babies. The children in Islamic societies suffer, and the women even more. But though individuals suffer, the family system itself works. The society perpetuates itself. …

The way forward is never the way back. Still, up until about 1970, Western civilization combined democracy, freedom, capitalism and neighborliness with a functioning family system. Who can now say the same?

This claim is even more absurd. Note that Gallagher first derides Americans and Europeans for not making necessary sacrifices for babies, but fails to note that many of the Muslim states she is referring to have dramatically failed their infants and children, with childhood mortality rates and other measures that would be considered intolerable if they persisted in the United States.

Similarly, while Gallagher claims that Islamic societies are mo re successful at perpetuating themselves, she forgets to mention that one of the things that Muslim extremists despise about the West is its culture that is steamrolling over traditional Islamic values, just as it steamrolled traditional Christian values. The emergence of Islamic extremism is simply the latest rebellion against the strongly individualist ideology that originated in the West and has been sweeping the globe over the past few centuries.

Source:

The Demographic Bomb. Maggie Gallagher, Yahoo!.Com, October 15, 2001.

iPod, Copy Protection, and Why Can’t Slashdot Read a Specs Page?

This made me laugh today — Slashdot posted a correction claiming the iPod will ship with a 10 gig hard drive rather than a 5 gig hard drive as has been widely reported. Too bad they didn’t bother to read the technical specifications web page that Apple has up clearly noting that the unit will feature a 5 gig HD. Tell me again why I’d pay a subscription fee for such information.

This part didn’t make me laugh though. The New York Times confirms what The Register had suggested — the iPod will ship with copy protection which will prevent some, but not all copying. According to the Times,

Mr. Jobs said the company had taken some steps to protect against piracy in its device. For instance, he said, songs loaded onto the iPod from a Macintosh computer, cannot then be loaded from the device to a different Macintosh computer, a step he said would make it difficult for people to distribute music they own to other users.

As far as I can tell from reading between the lines, the iPod will work as a normal Firewire hard drive, but any MP3s transferred to the unit via iTunes will be placed in a special area of the hard drive where they cannot be transferred. MP3s can be copied onto the iPod using normal file copy methods, but those MP3s apparently cannot be played on the machine.

Stupid, stupid, stupid. This thing is scheduled for November, and I suspect someone will have a workaround for the copy protection before the New Year.

Collect the Entire “Enduring Freedom” Card Set

According to USA Today, Topps, the folks famous for their baseball cards, already have a 90-card “Enduring Freedom” trading card set out and in stores. The cards feature picutres and biographies of people like George W. Bush, Rudy Giuliani and Osama bin Laden. Ugh. As if the Topps “Desert Storm” set wasn’t bad enough.

How Much Information Can the Universe Hold?

Via ArsTechnica comes an interesting paper (PDF) from Seth Lloyd attempting to estimate the maximum number of bits that could possibly be stored in the universe. The answer? Either 10^90 bits if you don’t take gravity into account, and 10^120 if you do take gravity into account.

Don’t worry though, I’m sure at some point Redmond is going to release an OS that will require an upgrade to the universe.

Who Gives a F— about New York When Elephants Are Being Killed?

British boy band Blue logged on to the web site of the British tabloid The Sun to promote their next single which is scheduled for release in the UK in November. Instead, band member Lee Ryan ended up making outrageous statements that the terrorist attacks didn’t deserve the intense media coverage, which should be devote to the plight of animals.

During the web chat, a fan asked why the group’s tour of Singapore had been cancelled. The group had actually been in New York and witnessed the second plane that hit the World Trade Center. After his band mates go on about the horror of watching that, Ryan goes off about elephants and whales:

Lee Ryan – What about whales?

They are ignoring animals that are more important. Animals need saving and that’s more important.

This New York thing is being blown out of proportion.

Simon- Shut up Lee.

Lee – Who gives a f… about New York when elephants are being killed.

Duncan- Shut up.

Lee – I’m not afraid to say this, it has to be said. IÂ’m not afraid to say it and that’s why I’m the outspoken one from the band.

The group’s record label, Virgin Records, apparently raked Ryan over the coals for this obscene statement, and almost immediately an apology was posted on the group’s official web site. A statement attributed to Ryan says,

By now you might have heard about the stupid comments I made the other day to The Sun newspaper.

I just wanted to say to you all how sorry I am, I can’t believe I said it. I didn’t even mean it like that and the second I said it I was like “Oh My God” that isn’t what I meant.

All I can say is that since we got back from New York we have all been asked again and again about our experiences there and, to be honest, what we saw in New York was so bad that I’ve always tried to avoid talking about it.

He didn’t mean it? Give me a break. This has “cover your ass” all over it. Or as The Sun put it, “Lee may have apologized but he is 18, old enough to vote and to know better.”

Don’t worry, though, if Virgin should drop the group or his pop career goes south, he’s always got a career writing editorials for Animal People.

Sources:

Who give a **** about New York when whales and elephants are dying? Dominic, Mohan, The Sun, October 26, 2001.

Blue chat outrage. Jacqui Swift, The Sun, October 26, 2001.

Statement from Lee. Lee Ryan, PopGoss.Com, October 26, 2001.