Is There a Point to America’s Military Strategy?

The Independent (London) has a good summary of what should be obvious to anyone reading between the lines of the various statements made by the Pentagon about that much-hyped Ranger raid into Afghanistan — it was almost a disaster.

Lisa and I were talking about this on Friday, concluding that U.S. military policy often seems predicated on the assumption that American will always facing idiots and morons in the field (presumably, Pentagon bureacrats using what they known as models for opposing forces).

For example, the United States over the last few weeks has received yet another lesson about the limitations of air power, and yet the Pentagon is still going forward with 3,000 new Joint Strike Fighter jets at a price take of almost $70 million a piece before the inevitable cost over-runs.

Source:

Lockheed Wins $200B Jet Fighter Contract. Fox News, October 27, 2001.

Can the Lions Do the Unthinkable? Is a 0-16 Season Possible?

I live about halfway between Chicago and Detroit, but unfortunately because I’m still in Michigan, Fox and CBS always serve up Detroit Lions games if that pathetic excuse for a football team happens to be playing. On the other hand although their games aren’t very fun to watch, there has to be something to an organization that has taken losing to such a high art.

The Detroit Lions are to football what the Los Angeles Clippers are to basketball. It’s kind of like those tabloid psychics — even if they are complete frauds with no special talent whatsoever, you have to believe that sheer chance would occasionally produce some accurate insight or a good team.

But alas, even when the Lions occasionally made the playoffs, they did so with the worst looking playoff teams I’ve ever seen (and usually got blown away in the first round, indicative of the fact that they really didn’t belong there in the first place).

After a typical loss yesterday to the Cincinnati Bengals, the big question in Detroit now is whether or not an 0-16 season is possible. The San Diego Chargers came very close last year, and perhaps the Lions saw that as a challenge they need to rise to meet.

There are only a couple ways the Lions could avert such a disaster. The team is moving to a new stadium next year and is currently in a dispute with the owners of its current stadium, the Pontiac Silverdome, over financial terms of its old lease. As a result the Silverdome owners have refused to allow the Lions to practice in the stadium. Detroit News sports columnist Joe Falls suggests the Silverdome could go a step further and do everyone a favor by refusing to allow the Lions to play their games in the stadium as well.

The other possibility is the very last game of the season against the Dallas Cowboys. Detroit News columnist Mike O’Hara oddly claims that Dallas game is the Lions “only sure victory on the schedule.”

Earth to O’Hara: the Cowboys have actually won two games (that’s two more than the Lions, if you’re keeping track).

As for me, I’m rooting for them to go 0-16. If the team is going to be mediocre for years on end, they might as well try to excel at that. A 2-14 record would be ho hum, but 0-16 — that would be a real accomplishment.

Do Drug Patents Present a Major Obstacle to AIDS Treatment in Africa?

For the past several years AIDS activists have charged that patents on HIV antivirals has significantly harmed the ability of African nations to respond to the AIDS crisis. A new study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, however, suggests that this is simply not the case.

Researcher Amir Attaran, an adjunct lecturer in public policy and a researcher at the Center for International Development, examined the status of patents on anti-AIDS drugs and found that, in fact, most such drugs were not patented in African nations. Looking at the patent status of 15 drugs in 53 African countries, they found only 172 actually existing patents for such drugs out of the 795 patents that might exist. In fact, in several African countries there were no patents on any existing HIV drugs — and, therefore, no legal barriers to using generic versions of patented AIDS drugs — but almost no treatment of AIDS patients with those antivirals.

Not surprisingly, the real obstacle to treating HIV in Africa is the continent’s endemic poverty. According to Attaran, even with generics AIDS treatment is still going to cost $350 per person in countries that typically budget less than $10 per person in their health budgets.

Attaran could have also added to the obstacles state resistance to the reality of the AIDS epidemic. Just this month, for example, South Africa’s government stepped into a major controversy over its continuing suppression of an internal government report on the AIDS epidemic in that country. The report was suppressed largely because it called for the widespread use of anti-HIV drugs — an approach which continues to be opposed by South African president Thabo Mbeki (Mbeki has, in the past, turned down large donations of HIV drugs in accordance with this policy).

Sources:

One Expert’s Opinion: Amir Attaran Says New Study Shows that Patents Are Not the Obstacle to HIV Treatment in Africa. Kennedy School of Government (Harvard), Press Release, October 22, 2001.

Do patents for antiretroviral drugs constrain access to AIDS treatment in Africa? Amir Attaran, Lee Gillespie-White, Journal of the American Medical Association, 2001;286:1886-1892.

Animal Liberation Front Hits Iowa Farm Second Time in One Week

Last week I wrote about the Animal Liberation Front vandalizing and releasing animals at two farms in Iowa. The activists weren’t finished with the two farms, however, and went back and hit one of the farms again.

The first time around, ALF activists released about 1,600 mink from the farm of Scott Nelson on October 16. Nelson had managed to round up about 600 of the animals, before activists once again invaded his farm on October 23 and released the recaptured animals.

An ALF press released said the activists would keep returning to the farm until they “close the place down, and ALF spokesperson David Barbarash said,

These people are quite serious. Fur farms have gone out of business in the past as a result of ALF raids, and I have no doubt they will put this mink prison out of business as well.”

Source:

Ellsworth fur farm raided second time in one week. Frontline Information Service, Press Release, October 23, 2001.

Mink sprung again; farm near failure. Staci Hupp. Iowa Register, October 24, 2001.

What Kind of Message Are We Sending to Our Children?

In an advertisement carried in Animal People, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals president Ingrid Newkirk takes a moment to claim that Americans are not teaching their children to empathize with others, since most Americans continue to practice violence at the dinner table. But mainly Newkirk wants readers to know that at times like these, many people — for some odd reason — aren’t as focused on animal rights issues, but don’t worry, PETA will be there to remind them.

Newkirk writes,

Sadly, people tend to forget animals in times of human crisis, which will make our work even harder. People don’t remember that animals in slaughterhouses and laboratories experience such horror and pain every day. Please help us, now more than ever, incorporate kindness into daily life and strive to gain respect and protection for even the smallest and most despised among us.

We don’t have to feel powerless; we can reduce the violence in the world.
Contact us for a free “Raising Kind Kids” brochure. And, please, practice nonviolence at the dinner table by going vegetarian.

Gee, Ingrid, what kind of message did you think you were sending when you helped animal rights terrorist Rodney Coronado? Was it a message of compassion that was on your mind when you said

I find it small wonder that the laboratories aren’t all burning to ground. If I had a more guts, I’d light a match.

If children are receiving a message that political differences justify political violence, that message is coming from PETA and other animal rights groups who insist on shouting that view every chance they get.

Source:

What messages are we sending
our kids about compassion?
. Ingrid Newkirk, Animal People, Fall 2001.

Should Americans Have More Babies for the Fatherland?

Some Islamic extremists claim that the United States is doomed because of our cultural degeneration, best exemplified by the general toleration (if not formal legal sanction) of homosexuality and casual sexual relationships. Conservative author and columnist Maggie Gallagher agrees with much of this analysis, claiming that America’s biggest threat is its own internal cultural problems.

Gallagher writes,

Here is my best guess at honest self-examination: The Achilles’ heel of AmerEuropean civilization is our sexual culture, which even to many Americans looks not only deeply destructive, but ugly. Fatherless children, fragmented families, the demotion of sex into a product — these are the surface symptoms of an even deeper problem: a hollowing out of sexual meaning and purpose.

Sex has no deep-seated meaning, no public purpose beyond providing an enjoyable set of internal physical or emotional sensations. Sex is a consumer good. People who believe this end up having unstable marriages, fragmented families or no families at all.

Clearly social institutions still lag the advent of effective birth control and the ensuing sexual revolution it made possible, but to suggest that American and European civilizations are tottering on the edge of internal collapse is stretching this point into absurdity.

For Gallagher, the transformation of sex ties into another concern of conservative thinkers — the so called “depopulation bomb.” The 20th century saw a massive increase in the world’s population that affected pretty much every country of the world. Toward the end of the 20th century, however, the population of developed countries in Europe began to level off and, in countries such as Spain and Italy, the population actually began to decline. Today, the United States is the only developed nation whose population is still increasing, and a good deal of that increase is due to America’s relatively liberal immigration policies.

But in the developing world, population continues to grow, albeit at rates that continue to slow year by year. Some conservative columnists see an outright disaster in this trend of population decline in the developed world combined with large population increases in the developing world. Gallagher cites historian Paul Johnson who believes that the differing population growth rates of Islamic and Christian countries will inevitably lead to a clash between the two blocs.

Gallagher endorses this position, writing that,

For hundreds of years, traditional Islam has failed to produce a society that is attractive: regimes of secular corruption alternate with regimes of religious repression. But Islam remains a successful civilization because it fulfills the two minimum functions any culture must: It channels intense social energy of individuals into the two great sacrifices of self: war and babies. The children in Islamic societies suffer, and the women even more. But though individuals suffer, the family system itself works. The society perpetuates itself. …

The way forward is never the way back. Still, up until about 1970, Western civilization combined democracy, freedom, capitalism and neighborliness with a functioning family system. Who can now say the same?

This claim is even more absurd. Note that Gallagher first derides Americans and Europeans for not making necessary sacrifices for babies, but fails to note that many of the Muslim states she is referring to have dramatically failed their infants and children, with childhood mortality rates and other measures that would be considered intolerable if they persisted in the United States.

Similarly, while Gallagher claims that Islamic societies are mo re successful at perpetuating themselves, she forgets to mention that one of the things that Muslim extremists despise about the West is its culture that is steamrolling over traditional Islamic values, just as it steamrolled traditional Christian values. The emergence of Islamic extremism is simply the latest rebellion against the strongly individualist ideology that originated in the West and has been sweeping the globe over the past few centuries.

Source:

The Demographic Bomb. Maggie Gallagher, Yahoo!.Com, October 15, 2001.