More Taliban Atrocities

This month in an Afghanistan sports stadium crowded with thousands of people, soldiers with the hardline Muslim Taliban movement carried out a criminal sentence — they gave a young man and woman accused of having premarital sex 100 lashes.

The man reportedly collapsed during the whipping. This comes on heels of reports that the Taliban plans to force Hindus within Afghanistan to wear yellow so that they may be more easily identified.

Source:

Taliban beat unwed couple accused of having sex. Feminist Daily News Wire, May 23, 2001.

Ephinephelus itajara Common Name Considered “Offensive”

The Houston Chronicle reports that the common name for Ephinephelus itajara i– the jewfish — is being changed because it is considered offensive.

Standard fare in today’s politically correct world, but the irony is the new name: the Goliath grouper. As the Chronicle sums it up, “the AFS is renaming the jewfish by giving it the name of a Jew-killing Philistine.”

The Fantasy Sports Juggernaut Rolls On

Hmmm…it is almost June, the fantasy baseball league I’m in is more than third of the way finished. Which, of course, means that as usual I’m lodged in first place. This year isn’t really fair since I had the benefit of the Detroit Tigers/Lions Rule.

Let me explain. The Tigers and Lions have been poorly managed for decades (okay, the Tigers did win a World Series in the 1980s, but other than that, they’ve been perennial cellar dwellers). So this pattern is repeated over and over again: some big star gets lured away from his team to play with the Lions or Tigers on a large, but short term contract. The player absolutely stinks for the few years they play for Detroit. The player than leaves for another team where he tears up the league.

So that’s why while other people were dismissing him, I snatched up Juan Gonzalez very quickly and he has become the latest player to provide evidence for the Detroit Tigers/Lions Rule. This also works in basketball with the Los Angeles Clippers.

Anyway, here’s how the current rankings look:

Rank Team Name W-L-T Win % Games Back
1  Brian’s
Bombers
50-28-2 .637
2  Can It
Be*
47-31-2 .600 3
3  heatround 47-32-1 .594 3.5
4  indy cougars 44-30-6 .588 4
5  KC RAGE 41-36-3 .531 8.5
6  DUKE 38-36-6 .512 10
7  Wildcats 34-38-8 .475 13
8  Perry
Hall Gators
36-40-4 .475 13
9  Hot Shots 35-40-5 .469 13.5
10  Channings
Greats2
30-47-3 .394 19.5
11  dallas
fools
28-47-5 .381 20.5
12  Thunder 27-52-1 .344 23.5

“I can’t imagine need more than 20, 30, 40 gigs…”

Apparently some bored ZDNet reporter felt the need to slam IBM’s newly announced hard drive advance, and so went out and found one John Moen, who is the owner of a digital mapping company, to give a negative quote. IBM is saying its new technology could deliver 400 gig hard drives, so Moen supplies the quote the reporter was clearly fishing for, “I can’t imagine needing more than 20, 30, 40 gigs — that’s a lot of stuff. I can see where 80 would be attractive [to others].” ZDNet also quotes Rob Endrle, an analyst with Giga Information Group as saying the importance of IBM’s announcement may actually be with handheld devices.

Give me a break. My MP3 collection alone currently takes up more than 40 gigs. I’ve got another 30 or 40 gigs worth of high resolution photo scans. On my home network I’ve only got about 130 gigs of storage total, and that’s starting to feel very cramped.

Don’t these folks ever visit a consumer electronics store? I’m probably a bit ahead of the curve, but no by very much — people are increasingly seeing their PCs as multimedia devices that allow them to manipulate and manage photo stills, audio, and video. All of which, require a great deal of storage.

Personally, I’m kind of disappointed that for the moment hard drive sizes for off-the-shelf ATA drives seem to have stalled at 80 gigabytes. I’d really like to buy a 100+ gig hard drive.

Texas Judge Requires Sex Offender Warning

The New York Times has a story about the Texas judge who recently ordered 21 sex offenders to display signs on their homes and automobiles saying, “DANGER: Registered Sex Offender Lives Here.” This sort of requirement is irresponsible and goes well beyond reasonable bounds of community notification.

In Michigan, where I live, there is a law that requires the local police to make available the names and addresses of sex offenders. The state also maintains an online database where this information is available, and for the most part I think this is a good idea. We were able to look at our neighborhood, for example, and learn that the nice elderly man down the street has several sex offenses.

The real concern with such registries are a) concern about inaccuracies, especially in an area like the one I live which is close to 80 percent rental properties and b) worries about vigilantism. Most of my neighbors know that this man is on the sex offender list, but several years have gone by and nobody’s attempted any violence or even confronted the man about it. They’re just a little bit more aware of where their kids are and what they’re doing.

Posting a “Danger: Registered Sex Offender Lives Here” sign, however, seems to me to be an open invitation for random vigilantism. The elderly man in my neighborhood’s never attempted to harm or molest any of our children, and he wouldn’t likely get the chance now that we know his past. There’s cause for parents to be a bit more concerned than normal, but no cause for him to be subjected to the sort of things that would happen if he had a big sign in his yard.

In fact, I’d think such an action would make it much harder for a sex offender to ever become part of the community again and thus increase the risk of recidivism. Now, some sex offenders shouldn’t become part of the community again, but as the New York Times story notes, there is an enormous difference between say a person who molests and physically abuses a young child as opposed to someone convicted of statutory rape with a 15-year-old after a night of heavy drinking.