Since When Does Marvel Own Batman?

This UK Guardian story is all messed up unless things have changed drastically in the past few months.

The obvious problem is that although Mark Millar does indeed work for Marvel, where he is responsible for the Ultimate series of books, Marvel doesn’t own Batman or Superman. Marvel and DC are planning a JLA/Avengers crossover book, but there’s been no mention of Millar’s involvement that I’ve heard of.

On the other hand, a Soviet Superman would be a great idea, though DC has already went through several reinventions of its characters. Didn’t the Guardian reporter read Kingdom Come?

A World War II Urban Legend?

The other day I was surfing the web and came across any essay about whether video games, etc., cause violence. The essay repeated a claim I’d read before. Supposedly the Pentagon commissioned a study which found that only 25 percent of soldiers actually fired their guns at the enemy. As a result, this little anecdote claims, the military actively work on ways to train recruits to overcome their reticence at killing the enemy — a program which bore fruit in Vietnam.

I’ve never seen this so-called study sourced and I am extremely skeptical of its claims. That only 25 percent of those serving in the military actually discharged a weapon during WWII wouldn’t necessarily surprise me, but that it’s implication is that upon encountering the enemy large numbers of American soldiers simply refused to fire back seems to be geared at misconceptions about combat that are exacerbated by media portrayals of war, specifically the war movie.

I’m made even more skeptical by what little I can drum up on the number of rounds fired per enemy casualty in both wars. I couldn’t find any sourced statistics on this either, but the general consensus seems to be that far more rounds were fired per enemy casualty in Vietnam than in World War II — with some folks estimating up to 1 million rounds per dead foe in Vietnam (which, if true, is likely a total of all ordinance rather than total small arms fire). Even for WWII the best estimates I could find were about 50,000 rounds of small arms fire per dead enemy.

One of the major differences between the two wars was the improvement in small arms which made it possible to more accurately aim automatic weapons fire, but even given that based on the information I’ve been able to find, even if soldiers serving in Vietnam were more trigger happy than those serving in World War II, the only net effect seems to have been that they used up ammunition at a greater rate.

I would be extremely gratified if anybody who knows of any solid, sourced information on this topic would pass said information along via e-mail to [email protected] or by posting it on this site.

Is White America in Denial About Violence?

Let me preface this by saying I always feel somewhat uncomfortable writing about racial issues because claims about race are so often misconstrued as establishing bias in one way or another. That being said, I find it very annoying that a lot of nonsensical claims about race are often passed around when a quick reality check would shatter the said claims.

Today’s exhibit is a Wired story about Tim Wise’s Alternet article, School Shootings and White Denial, which is apparently being widely circulated via e-mail. Wise hypothesizes that school shootings occur because whites ignore violence and dysfunction in their own neighborhoods while obsessing about violence committed by African Americans,

What went wrong is that white Americans decided to ignore dysfunction and violence when it only affected other communities, and thereby blinded themselves to the inevitable creeping of chaos which never remains isolated too long. What affects the urban “ghetto” today will be coming to a Wal-Mart near you tomorrow, and unless you address the emptiness, pain, isolation and lack of hope felt by children of color and the poor, then don’t be shocked when the support systems aren’t there for your kids either.

While we shouldn’t ignore the sort of violence that occurred at Columbine and elsewhere, the notion that white American is particularly violent is disproved by the evidence and widespread acceptance of this claim would be very dismaying since it would likely shift resources to combat violence from where it is needed (this is exactly what happened with AIDS, for example, where resources were large wasted on middle class white kids).

The bottom line is this: African Americans are six times as likely to be a victim of a homicide as are white Americans. Much of that increased risk occurs at a young age. By age 20, for example, a black male has a 2.8 percent chance of being murdered compared to a white male who has a mere 0.4 percent risk — a seven-fold level of risk.

As far as murder offense by race, the statistics there are actually worse than the victim statistics. Despite the disproportionate risk of being a victim of murder, whites still made up the majority of murder victims. That is not so for offenders. When it comes to murders committed by perpetrators under the age of 18, in 1999 35.7 percent of offenders were black compared to 33.2 percent white (2.2 percent were committed by other racial groups, and in 28.9 percent of cases, the race of the killer was unknown).

That is an incredible number and indicates, despite Wise’s claims to the contrary, that it is largely black inner city areas that need the most help in combating violence rather than the largely white suburbs.

FedEx Beats the FAA

For literally decades now the Federal Aviation Administration has been promising it is going to do something about the long outdated air traffic controller system. About the only thing it has accomplished, however, is its skill at coming up with excuses why the system is still not ready. Meanwhile private companies are concluding they can’t wait for the FAA any longer and FedEx Corporation recently went ahead and deployed its own high tech system in use at a private airport it runs.

The New York Times reports that FedEx is actively testing an air control system that relies on Global Positioning System to make landings much more efficient. Using a specially-equipped Boeing 727, the GPS system is able to tell the plan where it is at any given moment to within three feet, resulting in landings that are basically on the same spot every time. As FedEx’s Robert L. Ranchor told The Times, “All the tire rubber is all going to be in the same spot. They’re going to have to scrub it off more often.”

Currently the system is being tested only in clear weather daytime landings, but once FedEx is certain about the precision of the landings, the GPS-based system could revolutionize air flight. Today airplanes can only make straight ahead landings and inclement weather conditions such as fog typically shut down airports. Not only would the GPS system allow perfect landings even in thick fog, but it would allow for a variety of landing paths allowing for arrivals to occur more efficiently.

Moreover the system is extremely cost-efficient. The actual price for using a GPS system is about the same as a standard radar system, but a GPS system serves an entire 25-mile radius compared to a radar system which serves only a single runway.

Where FedEx has enjoyed a great deal of success, however, the FAA has crashed and burned. In 1995 the FAA announced a $475 million project to create a super-GPS system that would be have an accuracy of 7 meters and be in operation by 1998. That system is still in the ubiquitous “under development” stage, and apparently FAA contractors have had problems writing the software to manage the system.

Leave it to a private company to take existing resources, like the now aging GPS system, and design a solution that drastically outperforms what a government bureaucracy with a bloated budget can do.

Source:

FedEx Is Moving Ahead of U.S. to Improve Airport Landing. Matthew L. Wald, The New York Times, January 21, 2001.

House of Lords Rejects Fox Hunting Ban

The House of Lords voted 317 to 68 to reject the portion of a recent bill that outlawed fox hunting in the United Kingdom. The Peers also voted 249 to 108 to reject a proposal to continue fox hunting but only with heavy regulation. Instead, the Lords voted to allow fox hunting to continue in its current, self-regulated form.

Peers reject fox-hunting ban. Ananova, March 26, 2001.