Zimbabwe Hitting Bottom

Thirty-four people were arrested in Zimbabwe this week after food riots in two area, including a riot in front of a grain depot at Zimbabwe’s second-largest city.

If you’re a second rate dictator with a famine and food riots on your hands, how do you deal with it? By arresting the opposition mayor of Harare, Zimbabwe’s largest city. (If you had a different idea in mind, you probably need to brush up on remedial dictation).

The mayor was charged with holding a public meeting to discuss municipal issues. In Zimbabwe it is illegal to hold a public meeting without getting prior approval from the state.

If only Mugabe was as good at provisioning food as he is at wrecking Zimbabwe’s democracy.

Source:

Zimbabwean Opposition Politician Detained By Police. VOA News, 11 Jan 2003.

Food Riots ‘A Sign of More to Come’. Financial Gazette (Harare, Zimbabwe), January 9, 2003.

Don’t Taunt the Dictator

The South African Press Association reports that Zimbabwe’s government has enacted a new law making it a crime to,

. . .make any gesture or statement within the view or hearing of the state motorcade with the intention of insulting any person travelling with an escort or any member of the escort.

The press association notes that Robert Mugabe’s motorcade is colloquially known as “Bob and the Wailers” because of the blaring sirens from motorcycle escorts.

Apparently Mugabe’s opponents have been shouting opposition political slogans and salutes at Mugabe’s motorcade.

This follows passage of a law earlier this year making it a crime punishable by up to a year in jail for anyone who “makes an abusive or indecent or obscene or false statement” about Mugabe. Earlier this month a man was arrested in Harare for carrying a sign that read,

God shall confront Mugabe over evils done to people. Then would the police and the Central Intelligence Organization arrest god on that day?

They’d probably try.

Source:

New laws bans rude gestures, swearing at Mugabe motorcade. South African Press Association (Johannesburg), November 18, 2002.

More Zimbabwean Ministers to Travel to Europe Despite Ban

Despite a travel ban which is supposed to keep all members of Zimbabwe’s government from entering Europe, two Zimbabwean ministers have once again proved the ban is a sham by obtaining visas to visit the European Union headquarters in Belgium. The two are traveling there via Germany, which also is supposedly covered by the travel ban.

The officials will be in town for an African, Caribbean and Pacific-European Union (ACP/EU) Joint Parliamentary Assembly.

Is there any major government official left in Zimbabwe who hasn’t traveled to Europe since the ban was enacted?

Source:

Two Slip Through EU Travel Ban. AllAfrica.Com, November 20, 2002.

New York, Illinois Politicians Whitewash Zimbabwe Tyranny in Report

Several New York state politicians, along with an Illinois colleague, recently visited Zimbabwe and have released a unanimous report that whitewashes Robert Mugabe’s tyrannical rule over that nation.

New York City Council Members Charles Barron and James Davis; New York State Assembly members State Assemblyman Adam Clayton Powell III; and Illinois State Senator Donne Trotter visited Zimbabwe on a fact finding mission sponsored by The Black World Today.

The group apparently decided that they would release a work of fiction to commemorate their visit. As The Black World Today’s resident Zimbabwe apologist Donna Lamb summarized the group’s findings,

In brief, the unanimous findings of Barron, Davis, Powell and Trotter are that for such a young nation Zimbabwe has succeeded in accomplishing some tremendously important things, and the hard work continues. To revile a brand new country for not solving its problems fast enough is unfair, and to expect the leadership to accomplish everything without any mistakes is unrealistic. As Assemblyman Powell put it, “This is a newly developed country that was colonized for umpteen number of years and now it’s just coming into its own. You have to expect them to make mistakes. They have problems just like we have problems, and we have to be patient.”

Powell here is describing a nation that is currently experiencing double digit declines in output and is on the verge of a famine that could kill hundreds of thousands of people. Powell is whitewashing a tyrannical regime which is openly withholding food aid from people whom it believes side with the opposition. For Powell to claim that “they have problems just like we have problems” is prima facie evidence that he is unfit to serve in any capacity at any level of government.

The group’s claims about Mugabe’s “land reform” read like they were written by the PR wing of Mugabe’s Zanu PF,

As Councilman Barron explained, even though the Black Zimbabweans agreed about the urgent need for land reform, after Mugabe became President he kept dragging his feet. The white farmers loved him for it, but the Zimbabweans grew more and more impatient with him. However, he continued to ignore them for a decade and a half, until 1995 when he began land reform in earnest. Stated Barron, “Mugabe said there’s 4,500 farms owned by whites and we’re going to take back 2,900 from those who own multiple farms and leave them with the single one of their choosing. He told them they would be reimbursed for any structures and development of their farms, but not for the land itself.”

Mugabe promised white farmers he would never pursue this route in order to keep them in the country after its independence. Far from legitimate land reform, the seizure of white farms has been used as part of a patronage system to reward Mugabe’s followers. Not only have most blacks not benefited from the land seizures, but they are in fact suffering the most from the food shortages it has caused. Many white farmers had the means to move them and their families out of the country — an option which is unfortunately not available to those whom Mugabe’s policies have relegated to extreme levels of poverty.

Barron offers one of the most ridiculous quotes I’ve ever read about African food shortages,

Even here they found that there isn’t an intense anti-Mugabe feeling and that most of the people associate the food shortage not with land reform, but with the draught. There are diehard political opponents who want to say land reform is to blame, but it simply makes no sense. As Barron commented, “Africans knew how to farm long before the Europeans came. Then they were farming the land after the colonization because they were forced to do it for the Europeans. What would make anyone think that they lost a sense of farming now that they have the land back for themselves once again? The logic escapes me.”

Apparently Barron believes farming is something that is genetically passed along through Africans — just pluck a Zimbabwean family from urban squalor, plop it on a plot of land, and the family will just instinctively know how to properly manage a farm. The reality is that the seized land has been given to people with little knowledge or ability to properly farm the land and the result is a tremendous decline in food production. The drought explanation is simply absurd (one wonders if Barron also attributes Zimbabwe’s precipitous decline in economic production to drought — perhaps commercial and industrial enterprises are simply wilting due to lack of water).

Lamb — who is, frankly, one of the more despicable people I’ve had the misfortune to read this year — offers a classic fellow traveler-style take on Zimbabwe’s well-documented use of torture, violence and murder against the opposition parties,

The MDC said that during the 2000 election Mugabe’s ZANU-PF party used intimidation and violence. When asked about it, official representatives of ZANU-PF said that some of that did indeed happen. It occurred on both sides, but more so on the government’s side. However, Mugabe had known nothing of it at the time; he certainly hadn’t initiated it, and he condemns any of that kind of action now.

Yeah, he was only the president and leader of his party at the time. It’s completely outrageous that his critics might seem to think he had something to do with the all of the beatings, torture and political killings in Zimbabwe. But, instead, Mugabe was actually blissfully ignorant. Right, and Iraq doesn’t have any weapons of mass destruction.

Lamb’s take on repression of homosexuals in Zimbabwe is instructive of this sort of idiocy,

Other reports have reached this country that Mugabe was beating, jailing even killing homosexuals. Across the board, people said that was ridiculous. Mugabe had said some negative things, but basically in African society they declare that you can be what you want to be, however you just can’t do what you want to do in public, whether you’re hetero- or homosexual.

Mugabe said negative things? He gave a speech in which he said gays were “worse than pigs and dogs . . . a scourge planted by the white man on a pure continent.” Mugabe went on to urge Zimbabwe’s media to take up the fight against homosexuals by exposing their activities. The government-owned The Herald ran ads proclaiming that called for a “crusade” against homosexuals claming that “God commands the death of sexual perverts.” Male homosexuality is a crime in Zimbabwe punishable by up to eight years in jail (lesbianism is technically not illegal, but lesbians are arrested and charged on other offenses).

And just when you think things can’t get worse, Lamb and her fellow apologists just keep getting nuttier. Mugabe has arrested, tortured and sometimes killed his opponents. He’s used gangs of supporters to intimidate voters and denies food aid to those he thinks side with the MDC. But who are we to judge him — after all, the United States didn’t hold a presidential election until 1789!!! Lamb writes,

One of the things all 4 elected officials saw was the double standard this country uses in judging Zimbabwe and its history, and our own. They won their freedom in 1979 and had their first election in 1980, just one year after. “But,” said Powell, “this nation took 13 years just to have an election for president. We had General George Washington running the country from 1776 until 1789 when he was first elected.”

What an idiot. Prior to the ratification of the United States, of course, the country was governed by the Congress of the United States as laid out quite clearly in the Articles of Confederation which was agreed to in 1777 and ratified in force in 1781. Powell also seems unaware that Washington resigned as commander-in-chief of the Continental Army in 1783.

Well, he doesn’t know anything about Zimbabwe, why should we expect him to know anything about his own country?

Sources:

Elected Officials Take Fact-Finding Trip To Zimbabwe. Donna Lamb, The Black World Today, November 7, 2002.

African American Group Disputes Mugabe’s Claims On Land Reform. Mthulisi Mathuthu, Zimbabwe Independent (Harare), November 15, 2002.

Homosexual and hated in Zimbabwe. The BBC, August 12, 1998.

The Proper European Response to Zimbabwe

The Brussels-based International Crisis Group has the right take on how the United States and Europe should handle members of Zimbabwe’s government who travel abroad — they should be arrested and charged with crimes against humanity.

A recent report by the ICG said,

The EU and the US should use the International Convention Against Torture to arrest senior members of Zanu PF responsible for Zimbabwe having one of the highest rates of torture in the world if these individuals do travel into their jurisdiction without the benefit of international legal immunity.

. . .

The international response is still characterised by too much bark and too little bite. More credible targeted sanctions, wider, deeper and better enforced than those presently in place in the US and the EU are a necessary start.

The situation in Zimbabwe, meanwhile, keeps devolving on a daily basis. When food aid is not being outright blocked by the ruling party, an ongoing fuel crisis is making it difficult to distribute aid.

In just five years, Zimbabwe’s total economic output has declined by 25 percent. Zimbabwe is going to be feeling a lot of pain for many years to come, even once Mugabe is out of the picture.

Source:

Arrest Visiting Zanu Pf Officials, Urges Think-Tank. Luke Tamborinyoka, The Daily News (Harare, Zimbabwe), November 12, 2002.

African Nations Squeezing Congo

The United Nations didn’t make any friends in releasing a report accusing highly placed political and military officials in the Congo, Rwanda, Uganda and Zimbabwe of setting up criminal cartels to exploit mineral and gem resources in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Rwanda, Uganda and Zimbabwe withdrew their armed forces from the DR Congo as part of an agreement to bring a halt to that country’s civil war. But the United Nations report maintains that the military officials who were using their armies to strip DR Congo of precious minerals and gems have simply set up deeply entrenched criminal organizations to accomplish the same thing in their absence.

According to the report,

Three distinct criminal groups linked to the armies of Rwanda, Uganda and Zimbabwe and the Government of the DRC have benefited from overlapping micro-conflicts [and] will not disband voluntarily even as the foreign military forces continue their withdrawals.

. . .

The looting that was previously conducted by the armies themselves has been replaced with organised systems of embezzlement, tax fraud, extortion, the use of stock options as kickbacks and diversion of state funds conducted by groups that closely resemble criminal organizations.

The report cites 54 specific individuals and recommends a variety of actions be taken against them, such as freezing their assets and barring them for travel, if they do not cease such activities within a few months.

Of course the real problem is less that these individuals are willing to pay large bribes and use other means to gain access to the DR Congo’s wealth, but rather that the DR Congo government is so weak and corrupt that this appears to be the normal, accepted way of doing business in that country.

The reaction of the African nations was predictable — the report was all lies. After all, who ever heard of official corruption on the African continent?

Source:

Focus on UN Panel report on the plunder of the Congo. UN Integrated Regional Information Networks, October 21, 2002.

Africa fury at U.N. looting report. Reuters, October 22, 2002.

States set up cartels to plunder Congo UN. Jonathan Katzenellenbogen, Business Day (Johannesburg), October 22, 2002.

First Quantum denies U.N. accusations on Congo. Reuters, October 22, 2002.