VideoPress

Weblog Tools Collection ran an interesting review of VideoPress — a WordPress.com-hosted video streaming that I hadn’t heard of until the review.

VideoPress is a commercial Automattic product that you can enable in your WordPress.com blog. The cost is $59.97/year to enable VideoPress on your account. If you need storage above and beyond the 3gb of space that comes with your WordPress.com account, you can purchase additional storage: 5gb for $19.97; 15gb for $49.97; 25gb for $89.97 per year. There are  currently no bandwidth limits.

Although the service is targeted at WordPress.com users, there is a VideoPress plugin for self-hosted blogs that lets users easily insert VideoPress-hosted videos into their self-hosted sites.

Pixel Force: Left 4 Dead

Pixel Force: Left 4 Dead is a “retro de-make” of Left 4 Dead done in beautiful 8-bit style.

Lovingly recreated in a fashion that would have been acceptable in 1986 for the Nintendo Entertainment System, this de-make stands as the flagship title of the upcoming Pixel Force series from Eric Ruth Games.  Go alone, or invite a friend for 2 player co-op against the zombie apocalypse in all 4 of the original game campaigns.  2 difficulties and all 4 of the survivors make a glorious 8-bit appearence, complete with first and second tier weapons scattered along your path to escape.

Awesome.

University of Philadelphia Study of Payments for Kidney Donations

USA Today reports on a study by researchers at the University of Philadelphia on attitudes toward monetary compensation for live kidney donors.

The study, published this month in the Annals of Internal Medicine, asked 342 participants whether they would donate a kidney with varying payments of $0, $10,000 and $100,000. The study called for a real-world test of a regulated payment system.

The possibility of payments nearly doubled the number of participants in the study who said they would donate a kidney to a stranger, but it did not influence those with lower income levels more than those with higher incomes, according to Scott Halpern, one of the study’s authors and senior fellow at the University of Pennsylvania’s Center for Bioethics.

As the article notes, almost all live kidney donations occur where there is some family bond. Less than 100 people become live kidney donors for strangers each year. The result is that in 2009, 6,475 people died while awaiting a kidney transplant.

Yet the ethicists opposed to paying live kidney donors quoted in the USA Today story largely rely on the “ick” factor — since we pay people for blood, unfertilized eggs, and for surrogate motherhood today (to mention nothing of compensating people to become human targets by entering the military) but we don’t pay people to donate kidneys, well, there’s just something wrong with compensation for kidney donations.

George Annas, professor of health law, bioethics and human rights at Boston University’s School of Public Health, predicts a payment system would result in an increase in health care costs for transplants. He says the study raises the question of whether the United States really wants to put body parts on the market, even a regulated one.

“I would not be against a reasonable trial to see how it works … (but) we do not want a society in which the rich literally live off the bodies of the poor,” Annas says.

Of course the study in question found that income levels weren’t not a major factor in deciding whether or not individuals told researchers they would be willing to become live donors given enough compensation.

But more importantly, the question is not whether Annas will get to live in a world where people are compensated for becoming live kidney donors, but whether any of those 6,475 people who died last year — and the thousands who will die this year — might have a chance at living in a world where there was financial compensation for live kidney donors.

As one of the study’s authors, Scott Halpern, told USA Today,

There’s no real reason why that model [the current Organ Procurement and transplantation Network] has to be continued. There’s nothing intrinsically unique about organ donations that requires it to be a truly altruistic act.

Please Do Cross the Streams

David Gelernter has an interesting take on the future of the Internet, Time to Start Taking the Internet Seriously, over at Edge.org. Gelernter argues the future of the way we manage information and our own activities will be through mixing and matching streams of information,

14. The structure called a cyberstream or lifestream is better suited to the Internet than a conventional website because it shows information-in-motion, a rushing flow of fresh information instead of a stagnant pool.

15. Every month, more and more information surges through the Cybersphere in lifestreams — some called blogs, “feeds,” “activity streams,” “event streams,” Twitter streams. All these streams are specialized examples of the cyberstructure we called a lifestream in the mid-1990s: a stream made of all sorts of digital documents, arranged by time of creation or arrival, changing in realtime; a stream you can focus and thus turn into a different stream; a stream with a past, present and future. The future flows through the present into the past at the speed of time.

16. Your own information — all your communications, documents, photos, videos — including “cross network” information — phone calls, voice messages, text messages — will be stored in a lifestream in the Cloud.

17. There is no clear way to blend two standard websites together, but it’s obvious how to blend two streams. You simply shuffle them together like two decks of cards, maintaining time-order — putting the earlier document first. Blending is important because we must be able to add and subtract in the Cybersphere. We add streams together by blending them. Because it’s easy to blend any group of streams, it’s easy to integrate stream-structured sites so we can treat the group as a unit, not as many separate points of activity; and integration is important to solving the information overload problem. We subtract streams by searching or focusing. Searching a stream for “snow” means that I subtract every stream-element that doesn’t deal with snow. Subtracting the “not snow” stream from the mainstream yields a “snow” stream. Blending streams and searching them are the addition and subtraction of the new Cybersphere.

While I’m not so certain I want this information in the “cloud” (depending on what you Gelernter means by the “cloud” — I’d be happy to have it all on a hosted machine that I control, but I already have too much information residing on computers of companies who do not necessarily have my own best interests at heart).

Back in September 2008, I installed Sweetcron on this server to accomplish some of this. Sweetcron is basically a tool for taking syndication feeds and combining them together in a single lifestream in much the way Gelernter describes.  At the moment, my lifestream app checks 43 separate RSS feeds every 15 minutes and imports any new items it finds. Over the past year and half, it has imported an average of 58 items each day.

And that, of course is, is just the tip of the iceberg as there is a lot of information I can’t import there because it is not easily available in feed form, and information I won’t include due to privacy/security concerns.

Just a couple of thoughts on what a really robust lifestream application is going to need:

1. Lots of storage. If I included all of the information I’ve logged offline, including audio/video/photographs/screenshots, that would easily approach 20TB of data. That could probably be cut down to 5-6 TB using lossy compression, but that’s still a lot of data.

2. A robust database. Moreover there are probably 5 to 6 million data points in that collection rather than the approximately 35,000 points in my online lifestream. In order to be useful, I’d need to be able to do sophisticated searching to quickly include and exclude data by stream, keywords, text, date, etc.

3. Very strong security/privacy considerations. If someone has access to all my email, that’s a problem. If someone has access to all my photographs, that’s also a problem. Once someone has access to all my email, photographs, receipts, documents, call history, SMS/IM messages, calendar records, etc…that’s increases the problem far more than access to one or two additional accounts. After maintaining a lifestream like that for awhile, you begin to think of all the black hat ways it could be used by someone who wishes you ill.