VegSource "Censorship"

This had me laughing. After I finished the article about the inaccuracies in the VegSource.Com article, I thought I’d go over and post a link to the article on their discussion forum. But, of course, the last thing that animal rights activists can tolerate is an open discussion about their views. Here’s what you get if you try to post a message to their web site which contains a link back to this site:

Spamvertising not permitted on VegSource!

Your post contains information about or a link to a site which has been connected to repeated spamvertising on our site. Our site, and the 80-some non-profit sites we host, are kept online by the paid advertising on VegSource. While we do allow links to just about anywhere on the net, when a particular site is posted again and again on successive days and on different boards, we recognize that someone is using our site to try to get free advertising.

Please feel free to post on any other topic, and please be advised that if you try to get around this block and post a link to the site in question anyway, this is grounds for being banned from our site.

Thanks for your understanding. If you have any questions, please write to [email protected].

The only time I’ve ever posted a link on their site was last Friday when I posted a link to the first article about their fake photo. It worked fine then, but they did quickly deleted my message.

I’m not surprised. If I were publishing information with such blatant inaccuracies, I probably wouldn’t want anyone showing up to point out the truth either.

VegSource.Com Lies, Part II

My article last week about the fake photo at VegSource.Com generated quite a bit of discussion and a flurry of e-mails sent to yours truly. But for the record it is important to note that the sloppiness with the truth extends beyond Photoshop antics — the VegSource article that accompanied that fake photo contains the most basic of errors.

If a group is going to accuse the pharmaceutical industry of lying about medical research, you would think that such a group would want to do a minimum of research on the subject. Instead VegSource seems to have relied on the standard cutting and pasting from animal rights fact sheets for their information.

How else to explain this obvious falsehood in the VegSource article,

But they won’t talk to a credible researcher who might point to information like the fact that the combination of fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine (or “phen-fen”), prescribed by thousands of doctors to combat obesity, was tested on animals for years, and deemed safe for humans.

Only someone who has done no research at all about phen-fen could possibly write such an absurd sentence.

First of all, “phen-fen” was not “a combination of fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine.” Rather it was a combination of phentermine with either fenfluramine or dexfenfluramine (a small percentage of patients were on all three drugs.) It was the combination of phentermine with one of the two fenfluramine drugs that caused dramatic weight loss. You’d think VegSource could at least get something as straightforward as that correct.

Second, phen-fen was not tested extensively on animals. Both drugs had been separately approved and used in the United States as appetite suppressants for decades. The combination therapy, however, was an off-label prescription that didn’t require animal testing and became widespread only a few years before both drugs were pulled from the market.

Finally, the animal testing done on both drugs indicated, in fact, that there were risks to the way in which the drugs were prescribed in combination. Specifically, both drugs were only approved for relatively short term uses. Fenfluramine especially was approved only for very short-term use not to last beyond several weeks. When phentermine was approved, the FDA indicated that there was no data available on how safe the drug would be after periods of use longer than 1 year.

One FDA study of phen-fen users found that the study group had been on the combination therapy an average of 9 months, meaning most of those patients had been taking fenfluramine far past the recommended safe time period and a significant number of people had been taking phentermine for more than a year.

It is a little absurd to blame animal safety data for hazards encountered from off-label prescribing. But that’s par for the course from a group that can’t even accurately report what drug compounds were involved.

Source:

“Animal Experimentation Is Good!”
How Industry Front Organizations: Try to Twist Public Perceptions
. VegSource.Com, June 4, 2001.

Jack Straw Moves to Foreign Secretary

The resounding win by Tony Blair’s Labor Party in recent British elections has resulted in Home Secretary Jack Straw, who of late had become an outspoken defender of Huntingdon Life Sciences and other animal enterprises victimized by animal rights activists, leaving that position and moving into the position of Foreign Secretary.

According to the BBC, the move was made because Blair believes Straw has the right wing credentials to help the Labor government sell to the British public whatever it ultimately ends up doing in regards to European Union proposals for a single unified European currency.

No word yet on who will replace Straw, but Straw’s move to Foreign Secretary could represent a big step backward for those who want the British government to take a strong stance against animal rights activist’s disruption of legitimate animal enterprises.

Source:

Straw: New man at UK Foreign Office. The BBC, June 9, 2001.