Turner Classic Movies: Peter Feng vs. Charlie Chan

For June 2008, Turner Classic Movies has been featuring films and discussion about Asian Images in Film. To that end, last week they showed a bunch of Charlie Chan films and preceded the showings with discussions between TCM host Robert Osborne and film studies professor Peter Feng.

But Feng’s memory of the films seemed to leave him at times. For example, during the discussion of Charlie Chan at the Circus, Dr. Feng complained that at one point the dialogue has Charlie Chan attribute some common American saying as if it were an ancient Chinese proverb. As Feng put it, why not just have him say the phrase — why did the writers have to have him attribute it to a Chinese proverb when the audience clearly knows it is not.

The only problem is when that part of the film came up, Chan didn’t attribute the phrase to any Chinese proverb. He simply repeated the American phrase in stilted English. I hate when that happens — it makes me wonder about the other claims Dr. Feng made.

Also, Feng argued that Chan is extremely submissive to the whites in the movie, especially to the white police detectives. That is certainly true, but clearly the white authority figures are also made to look more than a bit bumbling and quickly take credit for ideas that Chan himself figured out. At one point Chan mocks a white police detective who finally gets Chan’s point by saying something to the effect that the detective’s mind works like lightning (though the detective clearly doesn’t get that he is being mocked).

Which is not to argue that there isn’t a racist subtext in the Charlie Chan films — the lead is played by a white guy for Christ’s sake, and Feng did a good job in his intros of highlighting other parts of racial stereotypes that the Chan films exemplify. But the racism seem far more subtle even in these films than is, say, the treatment of African Americans in the Chan films which is often so over-the-top as to be unwatchable.

Ultimately, I am a fan of the Charlie Chan movies and enjoy watching them, but they are also in many ways tragic in that you have to wonder what sort of amazing films we’d have if Hollywood had let some of these obviously talented Asian and African American actors, writers, directors, etc. make straightforward films instead of constantly pigeonholing them into these caricatures and stereotypes.

The Incredible Hulk

The Incredible HulkI’m not sure what all of those negative reviews of The Incredible Hulk were thinking. Sure, I guess if you went into the theater expecting the next Paths of Glory you might have been disappointed. But come on, this a summer blockbuster where the point is special effects and explosions, and The Incredible Hulk delivered plenty of both with a decent story. In some ways it was even better than Iron Man — at least the final battle in The Incredible Hulk actually made sense, as opposed to the obvious continuity errors in the Iron Man vs. Iron Monger battle.

It was also nice to see director Louis Leterrier include references to the TV and comics version of the Hulk, as opposed to Ang Lee’s film where the director seemed embarrassed that he was making a film about *gasp* a comic book character.

Unfortunately, the bad blood between Edward Norton — who wanted a more Ang Lee-ish film filled with tender character exposition — and Marvel means that it is unlikely he’ll be back as Bruce Banner for the inevitable sequel. But who cares as long as they stay on course for this Avengers movie that they’re clearly aiming for (as long as it doesn’t revolve around trying to guess which one of the Avengers are really Skrulls).