Meatout Sets New Record — Of Course, So Did Worldwide Meat Production

FARM-USA sent out a newsletter in March congratulating itself that, as it noted, “Meatout Observance Smashes Past Records”. According to the newsletter,

Activists came out in droves in observance of the 20th Anniversary of the Great American Meatout, setting a new record for participation. Records were also set for number of proclamations issued and number of billboards placed. All 50 states and 23 other countries were represented. Thanks for making this Meatout observance the best yet!

. . .

Hundreds of billboards and bus cards are carrying the Meatout message in Baltimore, Dallas, Denver, Eugene, Hartford, Los Angeles, New Haven, Oakland, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Tampa, Vancouver, and Washington (D). Celebrity entertainers like Casey Kasem, Mary Tyler Moore, Joaquin Phoenix, Rue McClanahan, James Cromwell, and Bill Maher headlined this year’s special observance.

Of course something else hit a new record as well — worldwide meat production in 2004 reached an estimated 257.6 million metric tons, up from 253.3 metric tons in 2003. Meat production is forecast to take a big leap forward in 2005 thanks to improving economic conditions, with an estimated 264.7 metric tons produced this year.

Or just stick to the United States. Twenty years ago, when the Great American Meatout began, annual per capita consumption of red meat, fish and poultry stood at 181.7 pounds. In 2003, per capita consumption of red meat, fish and poultry stood at 234 pounds.

In the intervening 20 years since activists have been holding their Meatouts, meat consumption increased by 22 percent.

But hey, they’ve got proclamations!

Sources:

FARM Campaign Update. March 2005.

April 2005 Meat Market Assessment. Food and Agricultural Organization, April 2005.

Atheist Idiocy at Brooklyn College

Ran across this story about the Brooklyn College Sociology’s Department electing Timothy Shortell as its chair. Shortell has a number of defects, but the one I’m interested in here is that he is one of these annoying fundamentalist atheists that I’ve talked about previously.

The sound bite being repeated is that Shortell referred to religious people as “moral retards,” but that’s actually one of the least objectionable claims from his essay, Religion & Morality: A Contradiction Explained. Shortell appears to subscribe to the Madalyn Murray O’Hair school of atheism in professing religion not only to be wrong, but religion and religious people to be suspect if not downright evil.

For example, Shortell writes of Christians,

American Christians like to think that religious violence is a problem only for other faiths. In the heart of every Christian, though, is a tiny voice preaching self-righteousness, paranoia and hatred. Christians claim that theirs is a faith based on love, but they’ll just as soon kill you. For your own good, of course. Those who believe that they are acting out the divine plan are the most dangerous sort in the contemporary world. Make no mistake.

The paragraph just prior to that one includes the “moral retards” quote,

On a personal level, religiosity is merely annoying—like bad taste. This immaturity represents a significant social problem, however, because religious adherents fail to recognize their limitations. So, in the name of their faith, these moral retards are running around pointing fingers and doing real harm to others. One only has to read the newspaper to see the results of their handiwork. They discriminate, exclude and belittle. They make a virtue of closed-mindedness and virulent ignorance. They are an ugly, violent lot.

Presumably Shortell is dismayed by the successes enjoyed by “moral retards” such as Gandhi or Martin Luther King, Jr. who went around pointing their fingers at others and relying on their religious faith to inform their respective movements.

Ah, yes, America’s academic intelligensia at its finest.

Source:

Religion & Morality: A Contradiction Explained. Timothy Shortell, Anti-Naturals, Issue 19.

Frank Perdue Dies at 84

Frank Perdue, CEO of Perdue Farms and one of the richest men in America, died on March 31 after a brief illness. Perdue was 84.

In 1971, Perdue became one of the first CEOs of a major company to pitch his products in television commercials with the famous “It takes a tough man to make a tender chicken” line. Under Perdue’s stewardship, the company went from $56 million in sales in 1970 to $2.8 billion in sales in 2003.

Along the way, Perdue became a controversial figure for a number of his business decisions. In 1986, Perdue testified to Congress that he had once sought the aid of mobster Paul Castellano to help suppress union organizing activities at his company.

And, of course, Perdue was the target of animal rights activists. Writing in Satya Magazine, for example, Jack Rosenberger had this to say in remembrance of Perdue,

As a vegetarian, it would be irresponsible of me not to comment on Frank PerdueÂ’s death in March or the laudatory obituaries which failed to acknowledge that PerdueÂ’s livelihood involved enormous animal pain, suffering and death. For the purposes of this column, I will offer some comments on the lengthy and euphemistic obituaries that appeared in the New York Times and the Washington Post. Yet, I am not sure how much I am commenting on Frank Perdue and how much I am commenting on humankind in general.

A little perspective: Frank Perdue was responsible for the breeding, enslavement and killing of billions of chickens and turkeys during his lifetime. . . .

The Washington Post found that the ethical issues, from an animal rights perspective, surrounding Perdue’s murderous business merited a mere two sentences: “He also was a frequent target of animal rights activists opposed to factory farming. In 1992, a woman dressed in a chicken suit hurled a cream pie in his face.”

In both obituaries, the chicken and turkey victims are nearly absent, their existence reduced to abstract words like “pounds” and “product.” “Today,” the Times reported, “the privately held company [Perdue] sells more than 48 million pounds of chicken products and nearly four million pounds of turkey products a week.” The Post was even more concise: “It processes 52 million pounds of chicken and turkey each week.”

The chickens and turkeys themselves—the once living, beautiful beings—are invisible.

Similarly, PETA’s website noted,

Perdue was responsible for developing many of the notoriously cruel techniques used in modern chicken factory farming. Crammed by the tens of thousands into sheds that reek of ammonia fumes from accumulated waste, each bird lives in an amount of space equivalent to a standard sheet of paper, without room to take a step or stretch a wing. The birds routinely suffer broken bones because they are bred to be top heavy and because workers roughly grab their legs and slam them into crates and shackle them upside-down at slaughterhouses. Chickens are often still fully conscious when their throats are slit or when they are dumped into tanks of scalding water to remove their feathers. When they’re killed, chickens are still babies—not yet 2 months old. Their natural lifespan is 10 to 15 years.

Frank Perdue leaves a legacy of unimaginable suffering for billions of tortured birds

Henry Spira took out ads attacking Perdue, repeating the mob story and other incidents in Perdue’s life. But Perdue ignored the ads and the activists and refused to accede to their demands. And, of course, the business changes that PETA complains about were responsible for a major decrease in the price of poultry and a huge increase in poultry production. Despite the campaigns of animal rights activists, American society came down squarely on the side of intensive chicken production.

None of the commentary from activists I read bothered to speculate on how a meat eater like Perdue managed to live well past the average life expectancy for an American male.

Source:

Vegetarian Advocate: A Better Death, Courtesy of McDonaldÂ’s? Jack Rosenberger, Satya Magazine, May 5, 2005.

Chicken entrepreneur Frank Perdue dies. Foster Klug, Associated Press, April 1, 2005.

Frank Perdue, Responsible for Appalling Cruelty to Chickens, Dies. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Undated.

India Considers Streamlining Animal Research Guidelines

The Express Pharma Pulse reported in March that the Indian government is considering eliminating a number of obstacles in that country’s Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act which have seriously hampered animal research in that country.

The Ministry of Environment is currently examining recommendations made by an expert group to streamline and alter the existing procedures. According to Express Pharma Pulse,

According to the proposed amendments, such experiments using animals that will bring significant gains in the wellbeing of the people of the country will be allowed. This will be incorporated in the Section 14 of the PCA Act. While under the current Act animal experiments are allowed only for medical molecules study, the proposed amendment will allow genetic modification experiments, nutraceuticals study, experiments for genetically improved food, etc., said sources.

Not only that, penalty for major and minor offenses will be separated, the Act will be amended to enhance the fine to Rs 3000. For minor offenses corrective measures will be taken and licenses will not be canceled arbitrarily.

. . .

The Rules also will be changed to relax the norms related to import of animals and DGFT will be authorized to clear imports. If animals required is not available from a registered breeder or alternate legal sources within the country, genetically defined animals could be imported with permission from DGFT, except that non-availability will not apply for genetically defined rats and mice. Further, the Rules are proposed to be amended to recognize contract research under the law and such projects need to take due approval from CPCSEA sub committee for animal experimentation.

This would represent a major change for a country where animal rights influence has pretty much strangled biomedical research in the past few years.

Source:

Government to amend PCA Act to facilitate animal experiments. Jayashree Padmini, Express Pharma Pulse (India), March 31, 2005.

Pig Domesticated Repeatedly Throughout Human History

Scientists at the University of Durham recently published the results of their DNA analysis of pigs suggesting that pigs were domesticated independently at least 7 times throughout human history and in different parts of the world.

Lead researcher Keith Dobney said in a press release,

Many archaeologists have assumed the pig was domesticated in no more than two areas of the world, the Near East and the Far East, but our findings turn this theory on its head. Our study shows that domestication also occurred independently in Central Europe, Italy, Northern India, South East Asia and maybe even Island South East Asia. The spread of farming into these areas during the Neolithic seems to have kick-started local independent domestication of wild boar.

The first evidence of pig domestication occurs in both Eastern Turkey and China about 9,000 years ago. It was believed that from those two initial domestications that the domesticated pig then spread across the world through trade and immigration.

But the DNA evidence examined by Dobney’s team suggests that, instead, other pockets of human civilization domesticated the pig independently, accounting for the animal’s widespread domestication.

As Greger Larson, who collaborated on the research, put it,

Our data show domestication was not as rare as previously thought and that the question now is not “where were pigs domesticated?”, but rather “where were they not domesticated?” This forces us to reconsider our assumptions about early human history and the beginnings of domestication.

Dobney and Larson’s research was published in the March 11, 2005 edition of Science.

Sources:

Pigs domesticated ‘many times’. The BBC, March 11, 2005.

Pigs force rethink on human history. Press Release, University of Oxford, March 11, 2005.