Catwoman a Financial as Well as Critical Disaster

Wow — according to BoxOfficeMojo.Com, Catwoman is a financial as well as critical disaster. The film took in less than $18 million this weekend after costing an estimated $135 million to make and market (including a $12.5 million payday for Halle Berry).

Personally, I thought the marketing for the film was absurd and somewhat offensive. Roger Ebert sums the film up this way,

“Catwoman” is a movie about Halle Berry’s beauty, sex appeal, figure, eyes, lips and costume design. It gets those right. Everything else is secondary, except for the plot, which is tertiary. What a letdown.

In other words, take the absurdly adolescent view of female sexuality that (still) tends to permeate comic books, and then turn it up a notch. Yeah, that’s a film I really want to see. (The Catwoman costume looked so stupid and over-sexualized that even the fanboys couldn’t find it in their, uh, hearts to embrace it).

Didn’t these people watch “Spider-Man” and “X-Men” and their sequels? You have to be able to sell the characters as real people or it becomes impossible to suspend disbelief about the whole super power thing.

New York Times and Los Angeles Times: Let’s Roll Over Basic 9/11 Details

This blogger points out a bizarre example of a New York Times reporter inventing a story out of whole cloth about the 9/11 Commission’s Report. According to a story in Friday’s New York Times by Matthew Wald, the 9/11 Commission Report debunks widely circulated claims that Todd Beamer, one of the passengers aboard Flight 93, said “Let’s roll!” as he and other passengers went off to try to re-take control of the cockpit. Wald writes,

The report from the 9/11 Commission on Thursday provided new, chilling details about what happened in the cockpit of Flight 93 in its last minutes. It provides a gripping account of the battle to gain control of the aircraft by passengers who knew that terrorists had seized the plane and were determined to prevent them from using it as a missile. It also discloses that the phrase “Let’s roll,” previously reported as a rallying cry for those passengers, may have been misinterpreted.

. . .

The voice recorder captured sounds of continued fighting, and Mr. Jarrah pitched the plane up and then down. A passenger is heard to say: “In the cockpit. If we don’t we’ll die!”

Then a passenger yelled, “Roll it!” While earlier accounts reported the phrase as “Let’s roll,” which was repeated in speeches by President Bush and became the title of a bestseller, some aviation experts have speculated that this was actually a reference to a food cart, being used as a battering ram.

This speculation apparently exists only in Wald’s mind. There is certainly nothing in the 9/11 Commission Report that calls into question the “Let’s roll” line and Wald’s unnamed aviation experts are probably unnamed for a good reason.

The basic problem is that Wald’s is conflating two separate incidents as one. The source of the “Let’s roll!” comment was never claimed to have come from cockpit recordings. Rather it was made by Beamer in a phone call to GTE supervisor Lisa Jefferson using the plane’s onboard phone system. Beamer in that call described the hijacking and that passengers were considering assaulting the cockpit to regain control of the plane. After the passengers have arrived at a plan, the supervisor hears Beamer say, “Are you guys ready? Let’s roll!”

The “roll it” comment from the cockpit recorder is a later statement as the passengers are busy assaulting the cockpit and appears to refer to using a food cart as a battering ram. This is confirmed by the Los Angeles Times’ account which notes that the “Roll it” comment comes at least after 10:00:08, which appears to be after Jefferson had hung up on Beamer and regardless is well after the assault on the cockpit has begun The odd thing is that the Times also screws the story up as well, claiming that,

Separately, a passenger, Todd Beamer, called his wife from the plane and she later reported hearing someone say “Let’s roll.”

Which is not true. Beamer’s wife didn’t learn about this until Friday, September 14, 2001, when the GTE supervisor called her to relay what her husband had said in his final conversation.

Perhaps this is what Alex Jones meant when he wrote in the LA Times on July 18,

Blogging is especially amenable to introducing negative information into the news stream and for circulating rumors as fact. Blogging’s fact-checking apparatus is just the built-in truth squad of those who read the blog and howl loudly if they wish to dispute some assertion. It is, in a sense, a place where everyone has his own truth.

If he would just change “blogging” to “Major newspapers” I think he might have had a point.

Source:

New Details in Battle of Hijackers and Passengers to Control Plane. Matthew Wald, The New York Times, July 23, 2004.

9/11 Report Reveals New Details of Fight for Flight 93. Richard Serrano, Los Angeles Times, July 25, 2004.

UK Fathers Rights Group Disrupts Church of England Service

A UK group calling itself Fathers 4 Justice disrupted a service of the Church of England’s General Synod in order to protest alleged inaction by the church to do more to protect the rights of divorced fathers to see their children.

According to the BBC, the protestors didn’t exactly receive a warm welcome,

Fathers 4 Justice leader Matt O’Connor was earlier rugby tackled and dragged out of the service by church members.

As he picked himself up he shouted: “Remember, half a million children are deprived of contact with their fathers and the church does nothing. Shame on you.”

Twelve protesters were arrested on suspicion of criminal damage and assault.

This is the same group that in May threw condoms filled with purple flower at Tony Blair while he was speaking in the House of Commons (so much for new anti-terrorist security measures in the UK!)

Maybe this sort of stuff plays differently in Great Britain — where animal rights activists and other extremists are allowed to commit gross acts of harassment and violence with little fear of significant punishment — but these sort of extremist tactics suggest that there may be good reasons these folks don’t see their children very often. They certainly do themselves and their cause no favors with such assaults.

Sources:

Fathers’ cathedral protest ends. The BBC, July 12, 2004.

Blair hit during Commons protest. The BBC, May 19, 2004.

Men Accused of Raping Three Women in Revenge for Lower Caste Wedding

According to the BBC, tension and conflict arose in an Indian village earlier this year when a young woman from an upper-caste Yadav family eloped with a 19-year old man of the Dalit caste, which is the lowest in India’s bizarre caste system. So several dozen Yadav men did what any self-respecting upper-caste man would — they first paraded the young man’s mother and aunts through the village and then gang raped them.

Police have arrested eight people in the Indian state of Madhya Pradesh for their alleged involvement in the attack. Witnesses told police that about 30 men were involved altogether in the gang rape..

India’s caste system is abolished by law, but, as this incident underscores, it is still solidly entrenched in practice.

Source:

Men held over ‘caste gang-rape’. The BBC, July 10, 2004.