Increased Expectations

Brad De Long has written a brief look at the progress of Project Gutenberg. The piece nicely illustrates how dramatically the Internet has shifted expectations into high gear.

De Long writes,

Thus Project Gutenberg has inched ahead at a snail’s pace. In its 32nd year of existence, the collection has only 6,267 etexts.

Only 6,267 free etexts? Certainly it’s far short of its ultimate goal of 1 million online texts, but almost 6,300 online public domain books is still a pretty impressive accomplishment in my book (especially since it was accomplished with donated labor — there are quite a few publishing companies who don’t average 195 books a year over a 30 year period).

Moreover, De Long leaves out the important part of the story — that as scanning technology becomes more widely available and more people have come online, the number of books Project Gutenberg adds every year is accelerating quickly. For example, more than half of those 6,267 free etexts were added to Project Gutenberg in just the last two years. Based on that, I’d say Project Guenberg has a very bright future.

Best Pre-Super Bowl Moment

Aside from watching all of the experts pick the Raiders (did they learn nothing from the Giants/Ravens matchup a few years ago?), the best moment in the hours of pre-Super Bowl coverage had to be Warren Moon’s explanation on ESPN that he would have had several Super Bowl rings if he hadn’t had so many teammates who sucked.

On the one hand, it’s fascinating to see how driven many of these athletes are to win a Super Bowl, but a little scary at the same time to see someone like Tom Jackson intone year in and year out that his failure to win a Super Bowl ring will haunt him for the rest of his life (and like Moon, Jackson has no problem blaming his teammates who — at least according to him — were more interested in partying than preparing for the two Super Bowls he played in and lost).

New Freedom Force Patch

Freedom Force broke the superhero computer game jinx and is one of the best computer games I’ve ever played. But despite good reviews and relatively good sales, Irrational, the game’s developers, ended up partnering with Crave Entertainment which seemed primarily interested in a quick take-the-immediate-profits and run maneuver. Despite an excellent fan base, Crave even shut down the game’s official discussion board system to save money and a second, much-needed patch to the game has been in limbo since late last spring.

To their credit, however, Irrational kept on working on the patch in-house and this week finally announced its release (they seem to have a Seth-like approach to their software).

So, the good news is if you have a decent PC (the game runs fine for me on a 1 ghz. Celeron with a crap PCI 3d card), you can probably find this game in a discount bin for $20. Add the two patches, and you’ve got a full campaign worth of superhero strategy goodness along with a Danger Room option that, combined with all of the free content available online, means you can set up pretty much any superhero combat action you can think of? (Want JLA vs. Avengers? It’s in there).

My Absence

No, I haven’t given up on weblogging. I’ve just been working 70-80 hours a week ever since two positions in my area of responsibility were eliminated and those duties were shifted to lucky old me! I’ve been training a couple part-timers to take over most of that, but in the meantime I haven’t had much time for anything except work-eat-sleep-repeat.

Tom’s Hardware Reviews First DivX Standalone Player

Tom’s Hardware has an in-depth look at the first standalone DivX player. This sucker plays DVDs, CDs, and CD-R/RWs & DVD-RWs encoded with DivX, MP3, or even JPEG images.

The KiSS DP-450 is manufactured in Denmark and currently available in many European countries. No word yet on availability in the United States (and this will almost certainly face an MPAA challenge, just like the first MP3 players faced a legal challenge from the RIAA).

Europe Approves Eventual, Someday, Maybe "Ban" on Animal Testing

The European parliament this month approved its so-called ban on animal testing for cosmetics products. What the “ban” really means since the full force of its provisions won’t go into effect for at least 10 years, remains to be seen.

Assuming the law is approved by individual states, by 2009 companies must convert 11 of 14 animal tests to animal alternatives (even though many of those alternatives are only non-animal in the sense that they don’t use whole animals).

Companies are given until 2013 to move to animal alternatives for the remaining three tests.

British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection’s spokesperson Wendy Higgins said of the vote,

This is potentially a historic moment, since to eradicate cosmetic animal testing from the European Union is quite an achievement. However, it is shameful that it has taken so long to do this. We are also disappointed we have a staggered sales ban.

Color me skeptical.

First, plenty of cosmetics and other finished products tested on animals will continue to be sold in Europe indefinitely since all existing compounds — most, if not all, of which have been extensively tested on animals — are grandfathered in.

Second, the 6 and 10 year respective deadlines is like balanced budget legislation in the United States — it simply delays the actual decision making to a point where politicians currently in office will likely not have to deal with it. As those deadlines approach, watch for high powered lobbying to extend the deadlines (and the cosmetics industry is already laying the groundwork for that).

Third, the ban faces a likely strong objection in the World Trade Organization that it represents an unfair barrier to trade.

This “ban” seems more like a classic political maneuver common to democracies where legislation that appears to take a strong position but in actuality essentially commits a government to no immediate action is offered up to appease a perceived politically vocal group.

Tune in around 2008 or so to see if the Europeans stick to their guns on this total ban on animal testing for cosmetics.

Source:

Law makeover closes animal test loopholes. Alastair Dalton and Nicola Smith, The Scotsman, January 13, 2003.