Jean Barnes Just Makes It Up as She Goes Along

Jean Barnes posted an e-mail to AR-NEWS the other day urging animal rights activist to contact the Commerce Club in Atlanta, Georgia, to protest an upcoming appearance by Deborah Insel. Insel is a former high school teacher who is going to discuss her work at trying to increase the number of low-income high school kids who go on to college.

For Barnes and others, Insel is fair game because she is married to Emory University professor Tom Insel, who is the former director of the Yerkes Primate Center. According to Barnes’ e-mail,

It is doubtful she will reveal her husband Tom has tortured and killed animals for years at Emory.

Deborah, has known for years about her husbands experiments and has failed to take a public position about the cruelty involved. Rather, Deborah Insel has (publically) remained silent and allowed the cruelty to continue. Deborah Insel has financially benefitted from Tom’s salary at Emory/Yerkes as he tortures and mistreats non-human primates and other animals at Emory/Yerkes. She has participated in cruelty by omission.

Cruelty by omission? Isn’t that what Barnes specializes in when she conveniently leaves out relevant facts and resorts to outright lies to make her case?

Barnes claims, for example that,

Tom Insel, one of the many vivisectors who has performed experiments on animals, especially primates at Yerkes, has made a career of useless and cruel experiments on animals. As Insel has admitted, Yerkes spent years on AIDS research knowing the experiments were useless and our tax money squandered. Not surprisingly, Insel failed to comment on the pain and suffering of animals he needlessly tortured in his experiments. www.the-scientist.com/yr1999/august/smaglik_p7_990816.html

When Elizabeth Griffin, a Yerkes researcher died, Insel was seen on 20/20 making callous remarks. Yerkes’ employees stated Insel blamed Griffin for her own death. Emory quickly reassigned Tom to other duties.

Lets look at these claims one at a time.

Has Insel “made a career of useless and cruel experiments”? Actually, Insel’s research in both humans and non-human animals has produced an important body of work in the area he specializes in, neuroscience (Barnes implies that Insel has done AIDS research with monkeys which is simply not true). Insel was the first to show that serotonin uptake drugs were useful in treating some mental disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder.

In animal research, he has specialized in studies of pair bonding in rodents. In 1991, Insel won the Curt Richter Prize from the International Society for Psychoneuro-endocrinology for rodent research demonstrating the importance that the oxytocin and vasopressin pathways in the brain serve in forming social attachments.

More recently, Insel and Larry Young of Emory University became the first researchers to alter the behavior of an animal through the alteration of a single gene. They created a genetically modified mouse that contained a gene from the prairie vole that suppresses vasopressin production. The mice were far more interested in female mice than are normal mice and made them more monogamous.

Did Insel say, as Barnes claims, that “Yerkes spent years on AIDS research knowing the experiments were useless and our tax money squandered.” Of course not — that claim exists only in Barnes’ imagination. In fact what Insel told The Scientist and others is that it had become apparent that chimpanzees were not a useful AIDS model, largely because it takes them so long to develop the disease. This is hardly news as most research echo Insel’s view that monkeys are a much better animal model, and much innovative AIDS research involving monkeys has been and is currently being conducted at Yerkes.

Did Emory University “quickly reassign Tom to other duties” after his appearance on ABC’s 20/20? That is a claim repeated over and over on web sites, but the reality is much different.

Insel did indeed step down as director of Yerkes on October 16, 1999. But not to be reassigned to some backwater out of the public eye because Emory was embarrassed. Instead, Insel resigned from Yerkes to take over as head of Emory’s Center for Behavioral Neuroscience. The CBN was started with a whopping $40 million grant from the National Institute of Health — one of the largest such grants ever awarded. As Insel noted in an interview, the Emory neuroscience center is probably the biggest program of its kind in the United States. If anything, Insel’s move to CBN was a promotion and returned him to concentrate on his primary interest, neuroscience.

Maybe where Barnes is from being appointed to head up the largest center in the United States dedicated to your specialty qualifies as being “quickly reassigned . . . to other duties,” but the rest of us should be so lucky.

Sources;

AIDS vaccine researchers turn from chimps to monkeys. Paul Smaglik, The Scientist, 13[16]:7, Aug. 16, 1999.

(GA) animal abuser’s wife at Commerce Club. Jean Barnes, E-mail, March 25, 2002.

Yerkes chief steps down for new post. M.A.J. McKenna, The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, October 16, 1999.

Why do Voles Fall in Love? Emory Magazine, Spring 1999.

Atlanta’s Medical Mile: AIDS, Neuroscience Center Ready To Open. M.A.J. McKenna, The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, October 3, 1999.

Insel leaves Yerkes post to head neuroscience center. Emory Report, October 25, 1999.

New techniques show the power of a single gene. The Dana Brain Daybook, September/October 1999.

Zimbabwe Arrests Correspondent for British Newspaper

The BBC reports that a Zimbabwean correspondent for The Daily Telegraph was arrested and charged with “publishing false information.”

Peta Thornycroft, 57, was apparently arrested because she was investigating alleged acts of violence carried out by government supporter against Zimbabwe’s opposition parties.

Anything which might be critical of Zimbabwe president Robert Mugabe is now officially a crime under that nation’s laws.

My Freedom Force Review

It’s official — the superhero computer game curse is finally over. Freedom Force arrived in stores for this week and it is getting extremely good reviews from gaming web sites. I’ve spent the last two days running through the game’s 25 missions until my eyes are too blurry to focus. Freedom Force is largely what I expected, but it still has a lot of unrealized potential.

FF is basically a squad-level real time strategy game coupled with an RPG-like character creation system. The player takes up to four characters into missions. This can get pretty hairy, so pressing the space bar or right clicking pauses the game and allows the player to issue orders to the superheroes. Much of the game is spent pausing to give orders, letting the game run to see your characters carry out those orders, and then pausing again to issue new orders.

Some people have complained about this style of gameplay, but I think it worked great. A strict turn-based system would be completely unwieldy. FF achieves a nice balance that is half-turn based and half-RTS.

The graphics and sound are both excellent. There’s nothing quite like watching one of your heroes hovering above the din, throwing lightning bolts down upon an unsuspecting villain. The game is well-balanced and, just like in the comic books, requires figuring out how to get your 4 superheroes to work like a team to defeat the enemies.

The character creation system is superb. You have to play the first several missions with the characters included with the game, but can create your own characters and bring them into missions later. Characters are created based on a system that very closely resembles the sort of thing common in pen and pencil games like Champions. There are point limits to characters, and attributes and powers are purchased from that point pool. The power creator, like Champions and other RPGs, offers numerous basic attacks and allows the user to modify them such that pretty much anything you can imagine from the comic books. In fact, there are very few comic book heroes or villains which could not be constructed with this system, and certainly the few stragglers will be addressed in the inevitable expansion packs.

A player could spend hours just creating characters. The main drawback with Freedom Force is that the rest of the game is not quite as well fleshed out as the character creator is. Many of the missions were, frankly, tedious. Rather than the enormous superteam battles from comic books, much of the time in missions is spent picking off low-powered underlings. That’s okay the first time through, but there is not a lot of replay value in most of the missions.

Unfortunately there is no basic single player skirmish mode. At a minimum many players assumed they’d be able to pick a map, through a few super villains on it, get their superteam together and just be able to go at it. But there is no option to do that as of yet, though so many people are requesting it, such a mode will almost certainly be offered via a patch at some point.

Similarly, there are a lot of complaints about the multiplayer. For a number of reasons — mainly the pause and go method of gameplay — I’m not sure FF necessarily lends itself to multiplayer that well anyway. But for those folks who were really looking forward to it, the multiplayer is hampered because a) the only option is deathmatch and b) multiplayer over the Internet uses the much-hated Gamespy, which is difficult to use if you are behind a firewall (and even if you are not, Gamespy is still a pain).

FF could also benefit from improvements in its control system. Even with only four characters to keep track of, controlling the heroes can be difficult. There is no way, for example, to tell what action a particular hero is trying to carry out. There is no queuing or way point system either, so players end up doing a lot of micromanaging. Allowing even a 3 or 4 level queuing/waypoint system would dramatically improve the experience. Again, though, it seems likely this is a feature that the developers will add via a patch at some point.

At the moment, the developers are working on cleaning up the map and game editors before releasing them to the modding community. That is where this game will really take off. The positive reviews mean the game is going to sell like crazy so there will likely be a lot of people working to add different mods (already, the number of superhero skins available for downloading is just amazing).

Freedom Force is not there quite yet, but it is clearly going to be an excellent platform for all sorts of superhero goodness. Is it worth $40? If you’ve waited for more than a decade for a decent superhero computer game like I have, the answer is yes — buy it ASAP. People not so enamored of superheroes might want to wait a while to see how the issues above are addressed by the game developers and/or the FF community.

My Rioting Kid’s Being Treated Unfairly!

One of the things I hope I never end up doing is being one of these parents who makes some idiotic comment defending the undefendable actions of their kids.

At the university I attended and now work at there is an area right near campus called Knollwood. Because it is a very large area with only two small streets leading to the main thoroughfare and because there are about 6 large apartment complexes with lots of open parking space between them, Knollwood has long been the site of student riots.

The pattern is always the same. Several hundred drunk students congregate in a large open area, then somebody thinks it is a good idea to start a fire. Then somebody else decides it would be helpful to set a car on fire and throw furniture and other stuff into the fire. Then police show up, get pelted with beer bottles and other paraphernalia, and the university comes off looking very bad in the eyes of the community.

And parents whine when their kids get arrested and charged with actual crimes. There was just a riot a couple of weekends ago that was probably the last straw for the city. But as for the comments from parents, there is a story in the student newspaper today about students being charged from the previous riot, held last Winter.

A stepfather of one of those charged thinks his stepson is receiving treatment that’s too harsh. The police charged him with felony involvement with a riot. According to the parent, however,

He helped three kids put something into the fire, that is all he did.

That is all he did? Based on the previous reporting of the riot, he was probably one of several people who threw a couch into a fire. Now, maybe things are different in this person’s community, but where I grew up people didn’t run around throwing couches into fires in the middle of parking lots. And there wasn’t a lot of sympathy for people who would do those sorts of things.

And there isn’t going to be a lot of sympathy around here for people who literally fan the flames of a riot.

Bill O'Reilly and Bridget Chufo vs. Howard Lyman

Howard Lyman appeared on The O’Reilly Factor on February 26 making the case for vegetarianism. Bill O’Reilly wondered if simply eating in moderation wasn’t the key to health and long life, leading to this exchange between Lyman and Bridget Chufo, the founder of Healthy Performance Weight Loss and Wellness Center,

LYMAN: Well, vegetarians live 10 years longer than people on the standard American diet.

O’REILLY: Is that true, Ms. Chofu?

BRIDGET CHUFO, HEALTHY PERFORMANCE WEIGHT LOSS CTR.: Well, I think you’re mixing up some confusion here in the sense that vegetarians, right, nine to 10 years longer. But most vegetarians have a more healthy lifestyle in the sense that they don’t smoke, they don’t drink, their exercise, they sleep adequately. So just eating in a healthier manner, in a vegetarian way, may not be the single variable that we’re talking about here.

O’REILLY: Right, but does Mr. Lyman have a point that eating meat and dairy products and things like that are harmful to you?

CHUFO: I agree with you, Mr. O’Reilly. Everything in moderation. The fewer foods that you can pick from, the fewer nutrients that you’re going to get into your body, especially with the kids. The kids need protein. And they’re not always going to get it from the nuts and the seeds and the tofu and things of this nature, simply because we have to deal with reality.

I have some pretty strong disagreements with Chufo, but she is spot on about the reason why vegetarians tend to live longer than non-vegetarians, with the proviso that vegetarians also likely benefit from increased consumption of fruits and vegetables (i.e, one of the problems with the standard American diet is not that it includes meat, but rather that it does not include enough fruits and vegetables.

Source:

Meatless or Meaningless? The O’Reilly Factor, Transcript, February 26, 2002.

Is Pain Research Worthless?

Patricia Wolff of New West Research recently posted an e-mail to AR-NEWS about animal research conducted at the John Hopkins School of Medicine which Wolff headlined, “Painful, Worthless Animal Experiment.” In fact, while the experiment was, of necessity, painful, it was far from worthless.

The study involved research into whether or not a soy-based diet can reduce pain and inflammation, and was the result of a chance observation by John Hopkins researchers while collaborating with an Israeli researcher on sabbatical in this country.

The Israeli researcher had bred a strain of rats for use in studying nerve injury pain. Some of those rats were sent to the United States. But when he began his experiments in the United States, the rats did not experience as much pain as did his mice back in Israel. After eliminating a number of factors, it turned out that the two sets of rats had been fed different diets. The rats in the United States had been fed a soy-based diet.

John Hopkins researcher Jill Tall and her colleagues set out to discover if the soy-based diet was indeed responsible for the diminished pain. So they took 20 rats, and fed 10 of them a dairy protein diet and the other 10 a soy based diet. Then the rats were randomly injected with either a placebo or an inflammatory solution. The rats who received the inflammatory solution and were on the soy-based diet experienced significantly less inflammation than the rats fed the dairy protein diet.

The rats on a soy-based diet also exhibited a much higher pain tolerance than did the rats on the dairy protein diet.

This is obviously a small, preliminary study but will lead to further studies. Currently Tall and her colleagues are looking in detail at the soy protein trying to get a better idea of what might component might be helping to relieve pain.

Many people seem to think that such pain research is an unjustifiable use of animals. But Tall is a research fellow in anesthesiology and critical care who specializes in pain experienced by cancer patients. The reality is that the advent of safe, reliable anesthetics relied heavily on animal research (anesthetic techniques which are also used to minimize the pain of animals during medical research). Continued progress on relieving pain will also rely on animal research which, by its very nature, unfortunately involves intentionally inflicting pain on animals.

Wolff had it half right — such research is painful, but hardly worthless.

Source:

Soy diet eases pain, animal study finds. Nicolle Charbonneau, HealthScoutNews, March 15, 2002.