AOL Chokes on Its Own Dogfood

The subhead for MSNBC’s story about the problems AOL created when it tried to make all AOL-Time Warner employees use AOL’s e-mail system says it all,

CompanyÂ’s attempt to use own software brings headaches

And the problem is obvious — AOL’s system is designed for very light home use (well, I’d argue it useful than much more than an evening of shouting expletives at the software), not the sort of heavy intensive use most business people are going to require.

Time was apparently the worst hit by AOL’s attempt to force its employees to use its crappy software,

Time Inc., the U.S.Â’s largest magazine publisher and a heavy e-mail user, was the companyÂ’s worst-hit division. Late last year, ad sales executives in Entertainment WeeklyÂ’s Chicago office were trying to e-mail a presentation to a major advertising agency. Because the system has trouble handling large attachments, the e-mail didnÂ’t arrive. At the last minute the office had to send a staff member in a cab with a printed version.

Now that’s what I call just-in-time distribution system!

Huzzah for My Hometown for Vanquishing Orbz.Org

Yesterday, Orbz.Org pretty much vanished off the Internet overnight after its operator claimed that he had been threatened with a lawsuit because the method that Orbz used to probe for open relays had a nasty habit of crashing Lotus Domino servers (due to a bug in the server).

Little did I know that it was my hometown of Battle Creek, Michigan, that was threatening legal action against Orbz. The city has since dropped all legal action (all it really did was send out legalese wondering what the hell Orbz was doing to their mail server), but with any luck Orbz.Org will remain down.

It is interesting that the folks at Slashdot are all pissed off at this supposedly clueless city of mine that caused what they consider to be an important part of the net to go black temporarily.

No, no, no, they’ve go it all wrong. Battle Creek was simply testing Orbz.Org’s system for any open lawsuit exploits. As soon as Orbz fixes that and tailors its network exactly to our specifications, we’ll be more than happy to take it off the list.

(If you can’t tell from that, I consider Orbz to be second only to Scientology in the list of private evils that threaten the basic functioning of the Internet. I’d rather deal with a hundred spam a day than go along with Orbz’s methods).

NOW Continues to Defend Yates, Avoid the Real Issues

After trying to distance itself from the Andrea Yates trial, National Organization for Women was back in the spotlight after the jury’s verdict (which this writer wholeheartedly agreed with) as Deborah Bell defended Yates and attacked the jury in the case.

According to an Associated Press story shortly after the verdict was announced,

But Bell, president of the Texas chapter of the National Organization for Women, said she was stunned at the conviction in light of so much evidence of mental illness.

She said Yates was “persecuted, not prosecuted,” and the verdict unveiled a need for public education, understanding and compassion about mental illness.

Leave it to NOW to want a reeducation campaign to make Americans better understand a woman who murdered her vie children and repeatedly said she knew what she was doing was wrong.

Bell is correct, however, about the need for a public education campaign, but that campaign needs to be about child and infant murderers.

The Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta released a report in early March noting that homicide was the 15th-leading cause of infant deaths in the United States. Children have a greater risk of being murdered during their first year of life than at anytime until they reach the age of 17.

Oddly enough, unlike Yates, murderers of infants rarely spend much time in jail. Typical of such killers is Melissa Drexler. On June 6, 1997, she gave birth to a baby boy in the ladies room of a catering hall where her high school prom was being held. She suffocated the newborn infant, threw the body in a trash can and returned to the prom. Drexler was released after serving just barely over 3 years in jail.

Such short sentences for killing infants are typical. Were the fathers of these infants responsible for the vast majority of them, you can be sure that NOW would have a special campaign to crack down on such a lenient court system. But the reality is that 89 percent of the known killers of infants under one year of age were females — usually the mother. Which, of course, means NOW and other groups are simply uninterested.

The jury that convicted Yates did an important service by sending the message that as a society we will not tolerate the murder of children. The next step is to have an equally strong response to people who murder the most vulnerable members of society, infants. A woman who suffocates her newborn son and then goes to the prom should not be able to walk out of prison after only two to three years.

Source:

CDC: First year of life a dangerous one. Associated Press, March 8, 2002.

Verdict sparks passionate reactions. Associated Press, March 12, 2002.

NOW Hypocrisy on Rape Testing

The National Organization for Women sent out a press release last week asking for funding of DNA testing of rape evidence. Just for a second I thought maybe NOW had gotten its head out of its rear end and was going to call for judicial reform to make sure men convicted of rape who claim their innocent get a chance at clearing their name with DNA testing. But, of course not. Instead NOW wants $250 million to process a backlog of rape kits stored by police around the country.

According to NOW, there are thousands of rape kits sitting in police evidence lockers that have never had a basic DNA analysis conducted. Why? Because it costs $1,500 and those silly police seem to think that the best time to do a DNA test is when there is a suspect in hand to compare the DNA to. NOW, on the other hand, seems to think that women’s will be helped by a $250 million effort to make sure that DNA test results sit in evidence lockers until a suspect is in hand (and without some sort of national DNA database, that’s what will happen with almost all of these results).

On the other hand, NOW has yet to call for any sort of funding to allow convicted rapists who claim they are innocent to avail themselves of DNA testing. In many cases, they cannot afford such testing and even if they can, in some cases inmates long ago exhausted all appeals and courts are wary of taking another look at the case, even just to examine DNA evidence.

But when it comes to justice, the NOW is satisfied to remain an girls-only club.

Source:

NOW urges funds for DNA testing of rape evidence. NOW Press Office, March 13, 2002.