Free Speech Should Feel Good!

The Washington Post has a story about problems faced by high school students who oppose the U.S. war in Afghanistan.

On the one hand, the Post highlights some of the heavy handed tactics of high school administrators who rarely put free speech ahead of maintaining an orderly school. But that’s a problem with speech at schools in general, not something specific to this particular war.

What bugs me, though, is the subtext that runs through the Post articles and other articles I’ve read recently that there is no such thing as free speech unless everyone feels perfectly comfortable in saying anything at all. For example, one student says,

It hurts that people hate you because of your view. It’s scary. They are Americans, and they believe in free speech, unless you disagree.

Another student tells the Washington Post,

I feel like one of very few people who wanted to talk about what America had done in the past and how that might have influenced the attacks. After I did that, I got accused of being anti-American and being a traitor. It’s like no one can say that America is anything other than perfect.

Sorry, you can say and think whatever you want, but the possibility of being hated or called a “traitor” (or worse) sort of comes with the territory. It’s interesting that the main lesson these kids seem to take from this is that they should have the right to say whatever they want, but that other people should not have the right to criticize them.

In fact, such severe criticism is extremely important for a free society. Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson can rant on all they want, but they have no right to expect the rest of us to go out of our way to make them feel comfortable when they do so. John Ashcroft can testify before Congress that his critics are helping the terrorists, but he shouldn’t expect folks to roll over and play dead just to salvage his ego.

There’s a good line in the film Casualties of War in which Sean Penn’s platoon leader character realizes that Michael J. Fox’s character is thinking about murdering Penn over the rape of a Vietnamese girl. Penn goes off on Fox screaming that every soldier in Vietnam has a gun and anyone can kill anyone at anytime — and that’s the way it should be.

And here in the United States, everyone has the right to air an opinion against anyone pretty much anytime — and that’s the way it should be.

New Look, But RSPCA Up to Its Old Tricks

A recent article in the Independent (London) reported that the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals has recently moderated some of its rhetoric in order not to be associated with violent activists targeting Huntingdon Life Sciences, but this is still clearly an RSPCA that is beholden to the animal rights ideology.

Currently about 1,500 non-human primates are imported into Great Britain every year for medical research, and the RSPCA is laying out a plan to gradually phase out such research (it is already illegal in Great Britain to conduct research involving on chimpanzees).

In a new campaign against primate research, the RSPCA sets out three goals: make it illegal to import primates into Great Britain; strictly regulate the transportation of animals within Great Britain; conduct a “critical review” of the role of primates in medical research.

Sources:

RSPCA demands monkey import ban. The BBC, December 7, 2001.

Time to stop monkeying around with animal rights. The Independent (London), December 7, 2001.

Should Christina Hoff Sommers Just “Shut the F— Up”?

National Review Online’s Stanley Kurtz recently wrote about an incident that occurred at a Health and Human Services-sponsored conference at which Christina Hoff Sommers was silenced and then rudely dealt with by panel members because she dared to suggest that the effectiveness of government programs that target boys and girls would best be determined by statistical studies of the effects of those programs.

The conference in question was devoted to “Boy Talk” — a program sponsored by the Center for Substance Abuse and Prevention which is designed to reduce drug use among boys. Sommers was delivering a speech which she had been invited to give when her comments turned to discussion a similar initiative for girls called “Girl Power.”

Sommers intended to discuss whether or not there is any valid evidence that “Girl Power” actually reduces drug use by girls, when she was informed by Center for Substance Abuse and Prevention official Linda Bass that her speech was now finished. Bass later claimed that Sommers had went over her allotted time, but Kurtz obtained a video of the conference which disputes this claim. According to Kurtz, on the video Bass never mentions that Sommers has gone over the time limit, but instead insists that discussion “Girl Power” is off limits and then simply orders her to end her speech.

Even Jay Wade, a psychologist who also appeared at the conference, told Kurtz that Sommers’ speech was ended not because she was over any time limit, but because CSAP didn’t want anyone criticizing “Girl Power.” And Wade is hardly a person likely to be sympathetic to Sommers. In fact, while Sommers and Bass were discussing whether or not Sommers speech would continue, Wade lost his temper and told Sommers, “Shut the fuck up, bitch” at which point the assembled crowd at the conference erupted in laughter.

Ah, nothing like a good, rational consideration of the issues at hand.

Source:

Silencing Sommers: Clinton holdovers have their way with HHS. Stanley Kurtz, National Review Online, December 5, 2001.