Several African Nations Want a Resumption of Ivory Trade

Several Southern African nations recently submitted proposals to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species asking it to once again allow world trade in ivory. Ivory trade was banned in 1989 after widespread poaching had reduced the number of elephants from an estimated 10 million in 1900 to an estimated 600,000 in 1989.

Botswana, Namibia, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe all applied to have the ban on the ivory trade overturned permanently.

In part, the ivory ban is a victim of its own success. Widespread poaching has all but disappeared and, as a result, elephant populations have increased markedly. In some areas the number of elephants now exceeds the carrying capacity of the protected wildlife preserves. In South Africa’s Kruger National Park, for example, the optimal population is 7,000 elephants, but there are now more than 9,000 elephants in the park.

Other governments also face similar problems where they will have to start killing elephants in order to prevent the elephants from harming other species.

Supporters of the ban insist that if it is lifted widespread poaching will inevitably return. The proposal will be considered at the CITES convention in Chile next November.

Sources:

Push to reopen trade in ivory. Michael Dynes, The Australian, June 14, 2002.

African states fight ban on ivory trade. Michael Dynes, The Times (London), June, 13, 2002.

Bid to overturn ban on ivory sales. Gaia Vince, NewScientist.Com, June 14, 2002

Who Gives a F— about New York When Elephants Are Being Killed?

British boy band Blue logged on to the web site of the British tabloid The Sun to promote their next single which is scheduled for release in the UK in November. Instead, band member Lee Ryan ended up making outrageous statements that the terrorist attacks didn’t deserve the intense media coverage, which should be devote to the plight of animals.

During the web chat, a fan asked why the group’s tour of Singapore had been cancelled. The group had actually been in New York and witnessed the second plane that hit the World Trade Center. After his band mates go on about the horror of watching that, Ryan goes off about elephants and whales:

Lee Ryan – What about whales?

They are ignoring animals that are more important. Animals need saving and that’s more important.

This New York thing is being blown out of proportion.

Simon- Shut up Lee.

Lee – Who gives a f… about New York when elephants are being killed.

Duncan- Shut up.

Lee – I’m not afraid to say this, it has to be said. IÂ’m not afraid to say it and that’s why I’m the outspoken one from the band.

The group’s record label, Virgin Records, apparently raked Ryan over the coals for this obscene statement, and almost immediately an apology was posted on the group’s official web site. A statement attributed to Ryan says,

By now you might have heard about the stupid comments I made the other day to The Sun newspaper.

I just wanted to say to you all how sorry I am, I can’t believe I said it. I didn’t even mean it like that and the second I said it I was like “Oh My God” that isn’t what I meant.

All I can say is that since we got back from New York we have all been asked again and again about our experiences there and, to be honest, what we saw in New York was so bad that I’ve always tried to avoid talking about it.

He didn’t mean it? Give me a break. This has “cover your ass” all over it. Or as The Sun put it, “Lee may have apologized but he is 18, old enough to vote and to know better.”

Don’t worry, though, if Virgin should drop the group or his pop career goes south, he’s always got a career writing editorials for Animal People.

Sources:

Who give a **** about New York when whales and elephants are dying? Dominic, Mohan, The Sun, October 26, 2001.

Blue chat outrage. Jacqui Swift, The Sun, October 26, 2001.

Statement from Lee. Lee Ryan, PopGoss.Com, October 26, 2001.

Orange County, South Carolina Bans Animal Exhibits

In the latest legal assault on circuses, in August the Orange County, South Carolina county commission approved a ban on circuses and other forms of entertainment within unincorporated areas of the county.

The ordinance specifically forbids the “display” of elephants, camels, lions, tigers, dolphins and 11 other animals for entertainment purposes. According to a Chapel Hill Herald story on the ordinance, “display” is defined as “any exhibition, act, circus, public show, trade show, photographic opportunity, carnival ride, parade, race, performance or similar undertaking in which animals are required to perform tricks, fight, wrestle or participate in performances for the amusement or entertainment of an audience.”

As Orange County commissioner Barry Jacobs freely admitted to the Chapel Hill Herald, the legislation was pushed through for purely symbolic purposes. Jacobs said,

I realize in a lot of ways that we did was more symbolic than real, since there’s little evidence that we have circuses in Orange County. But I think sometimes it’s important to support principles that are brought forward to us by citizens or that we ourselves already espouse.

Source:

Orange County, South Carolina bans circuses. Rob Shapard, Chapel Hill Herald, August 16, 2001.