Douglas Rushkoff vs. “Market Fascism”

Douglas Rushkoff has stumbled upon the answer that the American Left has been trying to find for years: market capitalism is destroying the world and only far right religious extremism will bail it out.

Okay, Rushkoff might not put his views in quite those terms, but that is essentially what the Rushkoff claims in an article for Adbusters, “The Sabbath Revolt.”

Like a lot of the worst articles and books ever written, Rushkoff invokes memories of an idyllic past where he lived in “modest neighborhood” where everyone “shared one barbecue pit at the end of the block.” Everyone would get together once a week for a neighborhood cook out, and everything was fine with the world. Rushkoff doesn’t tell us whether or not Ward and June Cleaver ever showed up so the Rushkoff’s could play volleyball with the Beaver.

Now that’s all gone thanks to the evils of “market fascism.” Now every weekend families go to malls and other vestiges of capitalism because there is simply nothing left to do in the world that doesn’t require an entrance fee (which leads me to wonder if Rushkoff ever leaves his computer to explore the world).

How did we arrive at this? Simple. Nobody is in control. Rushkoff writes,

Market fascists dismiss such arguments, claiming that we are paranoid leftists, imagining a conspiracy between a group of fictitious marketers and corporate chiefs — that such people do not really exist. In a sense, they are right: In the corporate reality, no one is in charge.

How the hell can a society survive if “no one is in charge”? Obviously, it can’t. We need federal leisure czars and control freaks to make sure that people are getting their recommended weekly allowance of neighborhood cookouts. If not, the rabble just my decide to do their own thing, which simply can’t be tolerated.

And what is Rushkoff’s amazing insight — the world needs more Christians.

The irony here is that religion might actually serve as a last line of defense against this branded cultural imperialism. Adbusters’ annual “Buy Nothing Day” used to occur once a week as a long-forgotten ritual called “Sabbath.” Once every seven days, the Judeo-Christian founders concluded a few millennia ago, people should take a break from the cycle of consumption and production.

Imagine trying to practice Sabbath today. What’s left to do that doesn’t involve paying for admission? Are there any public spaces left other than the mall? Though the Sabbath was widely celebrated even 10 years ago, it now falls outside the imaginable for the market fascists: wouldn’t it throw the economy into a recession?

It is a bit odd for Rushkoff to imply that the market interferes with religious expressions such as the Sabbath since the United States is among the most religious of the Western industrialized countries and large numbers of people still practice keeping the Sabbath holy. Of course those who do are usually attacked by people on the Left such as Noam Chomsky who can’t believe that living, breathing, rational people actually take the Bible literally.

More seriously, though, all Rushkoff is selling here is warmed-over Puritanism. If you travel in the American South, for example, you will find plenty of counties with odd liquor laws. In some areas, for example, you can buy beer, but not wine. In others you can buy any alcohol but not on certain days. If If I read Rushkoff correctly, these blue laws are exactly what the world needs more of — people seizing back power from the out-of-control marketplace.

Down with market fascism where no one is in charge! Up with neo-Puritanism paternalism!

Source:

The Sabbath Revolt: If it’s a free market, why does it cost so much? Douglas Rushkoff, AdBusters, March/April 2001.

Douglas Rushkoff on the Future of the Internet

I admit to owning a couple of Douglas Rushkoff’s books, and he’s always struck me as 50 percent genius and 50 percent moron (and 100 percent self-promoter). Anyway, MetaFilter linked to an article Rushkoff wrote for Yahoo! Life, basically doing a lame rehash of a “the internet’s not about making money, it’s about connecting people” rant. Rushkoff writes,

Or have a look at Blogger. ItÂ’s not just a Web site; itÂ’s also a set of publishing tools that allows even a novice to create a Weblog, automatically add content to a Web site, or organize links, commentary, and open discussions. In the short time Blogger has been available, it has fostered an interconnected community of tens of thousands of users. These people donÂ’t simply surf the Web; they are now empowered to create it.

Sure, except that Blogger never made any money to pay for its expensive servers — aside from the sort of speculative investments that Rushkoff disparages throughout his article. In the end it had to be bailed out by Dan Bricklin’s company.

Same thing with Plastic and Slashdot, which Rushkoff also salivates over. How long will Plastic be around now that its parent company laid off pretty much everyone, and Slashdot is chained to the fortunes of VA Linux (another company that relied on speculative financing).

Because he’s so safely liberal, the main political site that Rushkoff mentions is the rather dull Alternet.Org, whereas there’s far more interesting experiments in sharing and connecting on sites like FreeRepublic.Com or EatTheState.Org, both of which are far more interesting than Alternet.