Typewriters and “Fake” Documents, Oh My

This page casts doubt on a document related to George W. Bush’s National Guard service because, according to the author, it appears to have been typed on a modern typewriter. But the page has a lot of disinformation about typewriters.

For example, it is claimed that,

A couple of Kerry Spot readers explain that the memo linked above is “proportionally spaced,” meaning a thin letter like an “i” or an “l” takes less space than an “n” or an “m”. Apparently proportional spacing was impossible on typewriters during this period.

Huh? IBM began selling typewriters with proportional spacing in the 1940s, including its Electromatic which was very popular with government agencies (the document in question was written by an individual with the Texas Air National Guard.)

Typewriters and “Fake” Documents, Oh My — Game Over

There doesn’t seem to be much wiggle room anymore — the CBS documents are clearly out-and-out frauds. Washington Post has a story noting that there are a number of features to the documents that just weren’t possible with 1970s typewriters,

William Flynn, a forensic document specialist with 35 years of experience in police crime labs and private practice, said the CBS documents raise suspicions because of their use of proportional spacing techniques. Documents generated by the kind of typewriters that were widely used in 1972 space letters evenly across the page, so that an “i” uses as much space as an “m.” In the CBS documents, by contrast, each letter uses a different amount of space.

While IBM had introduced an electric typewriter that used proportional spacing by the early 1970s, it was not widely used in government. In addition, Flynn said, the CBS documents appear to use proportional spacing both across and down the page, a relatively recent innovation. Other anomalies in the documents include the use of the superscripted letters “th” in phrases such as 111th Fighter Interceptor Squadron, Bush’s unit.

“It would be nearly impossible for all this technology to have existed at that time,” said Flynn, who runs a document-authentication company in Phoenix.

Killian’s widow — who is very upset about the way her husband’s memory was used here — puts the final nail in the coffin. The most damaging memo was not an official document, but rather was supposedly written up for Killian’s own files. The only problem was that, according to Killian’s widow, he did not type. People tend to forget that in the pre-computing days people in authority such as managers or Lt. Colonels tended to dictate or write in long-hand and had other people type for them.

According to the Drudge Report, CBS News has already started an internal investigation into the matter.

ABC speculates on the effect it may have on the presidential campaign if the documents are proven fake,

The White House is declining to comment on the veracity of the documents. Many Democrats are worried that if they are found to be forgeries, it will be a setback for Sen. John Kerry’s campaign to defeat Bush in November.

What happened here is CBS thought it was going to stick it to Bush good on the Vietnam issue. Instead it has just handed him an enormous gift. Rather than having to answer questions about his National Guard service, Bush is going to be able to reframe the issue as one of a liberal press so out to get him that it will even run obviously forged documents to impugn him.

Already the left wing conspiracy theories have started that Karl Rove planted the documents to make CBS look like idiots. Right, and he probably delivered them in Black Helicopters.

One thing that CBS does need to do once they admit that the documents are fake is to come clean about how they received them. Clearly it looks like someone likely forged documents in order to use CBS to influence the election. CBS’ viewers and the rest of us deserve to know who was behind this.

Typewriters and “Fake” Documents, Oh My — Checkmate?

Powerline comes close to sealing the deal on whether or not at least one of the memos is a fake by finding an apparently glaring textual error. In the August 18, 1973 memo, Jerry Killian describes being under pressure to give George W. Bush special treatment, writing,

Staudt has obviously pressured Hodges more about Bush. I’m having trouble running interference and doing my job.

Only problem is that according to the Los Angeles Times, Staudt retired in 1972.

CBS and ‘The Reagans’

The back-and-forth over CBS’s “The Reagans” drama has been fascinating to watch. Of course in the face of pressure driven by conservatives, CBS decided to move the controversial mini-series to Showtime.

CBS’s statement announcing this is bizarre,

CBS will not broadcast The Reagans on November 16 and 18. This decision is based solely on our reaction to seeing the final film, not the controversy that erupted around a draft of the script.

It’s amusing to see how a major media outlet, when faced when its own scandal, spins as poorly as any politician out there. The decision had nothing to do with the outcry over the film? That’s about as believable as a CBS story about destroying weapons bunkers in Iraq.

Although the mini-series features impressive production values and acting performances, and although the producers have sources to verify each scene in the script, we believe it does not present a balanced portrayal of the Reagans for CBS and its audience. Subsequent edits that we considered did not address those concerns.

As far as I can tell, CBS is simply flat-out lying about their sourcing claims. As Patty Davis, who in the past has had less than flattering things to say about her famous family, notes in Time magazine,

In the New York Times on October 21st, one of the writers admitted that the line about AIDS victims was completely fabricated. In that same article, Jim Rutenberg reported that the producers claimed no major event was depicted without two confirming sources.

In fact, Davis cites numerous errors related to their depiction of her life in the film (emphasis added),

Nor do I remember conducting an impromptu yoga class at my wedding reception. (I promise you, no one at my wedding was chanting Om or Shanti.)

. . .

Consider the scene in a girlsÂ’ boarding school I supposedly was attending when my father was elected governor of California (I was never at an all-girlsÂ’ boarding school.) They have a classmate saying to me, “HitlerÂ’s just been elected governor.” No one writes a line like that with any other agenda except to wound.

But nothing beats the third paragraph of the CBS explanation of the switch to Showtime for “The Reagans,”

A free broadcast network, available to all over the public airwaves, has different standards than media the public must pay to view. We do, however, recognize and respect the filmmakers’ right to have their voice heard and their film seen. As such, we have reached an agreement to license the exhibition rights for the film to Showtime, a subscriber-based, pay-cable network. We believe this is a solution that benefits everyone involved.

Ah, I get it now — it’s okay to make absurdly bogus biographical films of people provided you show them on a pay-cable channel. How about a new slogan: Showtime — for the times when integrity is a liability!

Source:

‘The Reagans,’ From One of Them. Patti Davis, Time, November 3, 2003.

What Happened to the Real Dan Rather?

First, Dan Rather and CBS News got blasted by conservatives for ignoring the Chandra Levy story. Now USA Today reports that Rather apparently created another mini-controversy by (gasp!) suggesting on the air that the issues surrounding the use of embryonic stem cells was so complex, that viewers should pick up a newspaper or magazine to get more complete coverage of the controversy than television or radio could manage.

What’s next — will news anchors go so far as to urge people to read a book?(crappy World War II nostalgia by Tom Brokaw doesn’t count)