Antiwar Protest Pics – July 13, 2003

Once again this Sunday I found myself in downtown Kalamazoo to photograph the
weekly antiwar protests. This time, however, I spent much of my time talking
with a woman is writing a book (more on that later) and so didn’t end up with
enough time to take the usual number of shots. As a result, many of these are
hard to see (there is actually quite a bit of traffic through this area at this
time of day so it’s a matter of waiting for lights to change, traffic to clear,
and then get close enough to take a decent shot without getting run over. Rinse,
wash, and repeat). As usual, though, you can download extremely hi-res versions
of all of these photos at the link given at the end of this article.

From left to right, starting with the woman holding the sign sidewsign sidewise
her sign reads “Bush/Cheney are guilty of using weapons of mass destruction.”

Next to her we have, “Violence begets violence,” which is an interesting
sentiment. Of course sometimes nonviolence begets violence as well. Not quite
sure what the point is there.

Continuing left we have a sign reading “Peace and Justice for the Palestinians.”
There are usually two or three Palestinian-related signs in the crowd every
Sunday, and who could blame them — an undemocratic state without a free press
that encourages terrorism vs. one of the rare legitimate democracies in the
Middle East. You know where the Left is going to come down in that debate.

Next we have, “Resist not evil with evil.” This is from Matthew 5:39,
except that most translations of the Bible don’t quite translate it this
way. Rather than being a call to not resist evil with evil means (which makes
sense), Matthew 5:39 is generally translated as a call to not resist evil period,

[38] Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth
for a tooth: [39] But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever
shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. [40] And
if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have
[thy] cloke also.

I’ve always thought this was one of the more goofier of the New Testament teachings.
A lot of Christian analyses of this passage really jumps through a lot of hoops
to try to argue that it does not entail pacifism.

Finally, we have a “Where are the weapons of mass destruction” sign.
As I told the woman I talked with, I never thought it made much sense to emphasize
the WMD argument which seems to have been done largely in the failed attempt
to obtain a second UN resolution. Maybe they’ll find WMD, maybe they won’t,
but it shouldn’t have been the focus of the pro-war argument.

The guy with the big white sign wansts to know if we’re “Liberators or
oppressors?” I wonder how these
folks
would have answered questions about oppression in Iraq?

Next to him is a woman “Make love not war.” Why not make love and war?

Maybe we should “Wage Peace.” Well, that’s apparently the United
Nations view as well, and we all saw how well that worked in Rwanda.

Finally, “Bush Lies” and “Send our troops home!”

These are really hard to see (stupid digital camera metering).

On the far left, we have a person with a sign reading, “The rich start
wars, the poor get slaughtered.” The man with the fabric sign on two sticks
is proclaiming that “Violence is no solution.” Next to him, a man
is holding a sign reading, “Who has used weapons of mass destruction –
U.S.A.”

And next to him, “Instead of weapons invest in people of Israel &
Palestine.”

Note: As a public service, I’ve included all of the photographs I took of the protests on July 13, 2003 here. These are free to use for any purpose provided you credit me, Brian Carnell, as the photographer. Take them, edit them, republish them, whatever.

Who Is Next, Syria? — Anti-War Protest Photos

These are some pictures I snapped at an anti-war protest held outside
a federal building here in Kalamazoo, MI, back on May 25, 2003 (you can click on
any of these pictures for bigger versions).

This is just a basic crowd shot to give an idea of the size — I would say there
were 60 to 80 people present (there are some people off to the far right that
are not visible in this picture)

You cannot make out what this sign says in the small version, but it has a picture
of an Arab woman and the text above her reads “Are you willing to kill
her?” and below “STOP THE WAR ON IRAQ.” Given all of
the evidence of mass graves, torture, etc. found in Iraq after the war, an equally
suitable caption might have been “Are you willing to stand by while Saddam
Hussein kills her?”

This guy’s sign took the prize. Are people on the Left losing
sleep over the thought that another brutal dictatorship in the Middle East might
be overthrown? What I would like to do is buy this guy a plane ticket to
Syria and ask him to parade around for 15 minutes on a public street corner
there with a sign reading, “Who is next, Lebanon?”

If you could not afford to bring your own sign, there were dozens conveniently
laid out on a shrubbery. Apparently “Drop Bush Not Bombs” was not
as sexy as “Who is next, Syria?”

And then you get signs that just do not make sense. War is bad for my mental
health? I just have no idea what this person is getting at.

Again, pointless bland slogan that looks like it could have been lifted from
America First propaganda — how can we go off and fight fascist Germany,
Italy and Japan when we have not even perfected democracy here?

That just formed a mental image I could have done without.

No tax cuts for the rich — but do not threaten those wealthy dictatorial oligarchs
in the Middle East, nosiree.

Note: As a public service, I’ve included all of the photographs I took of the protests on May 25, 2003 here. These are free to use for any purpose provided you credit me, Brian Carnell, as the photographer. Take them, edit them, republish them, whatever.

Anti-War Protest/Get Together

On April 16 the anti-war student group at the university I work had a lunch-time
protest/get together near a footpath where three of the largest dorms come together.

Although I generally support the war, I wonder sometimes how I’d sell the anti-war
message if I was on the other side. Not like this. Appealing to a blanket form
of pacifism is a non-starter because it generally appeals only to people who
already share that particular ideology. It also doesn’t help if you’re doing
a “War is not the answer”-style message but you’re presenting individuals
who are on record as supporting various armed revolutionary movements as these
folks have done.

Only about 8 people showed up, and they all seemed to be anti-war activists
who spent most of the time playing frisbee like this guy. Hint: if you look
like you could have been in the outtakes of “PCU” you need to rethink
your strategy.

Cute flag, but the symbolism is lost a bit by draping it over this gas guzzler.
Hint: if you’re going to claim the war is about oil, don’t have 5 or 6 gas guzzling
vehicles parked around your protest.

Okay she mangled most of the songs she sang, but I still give her an A for
effort. But if I have to hear another Indigo Girls cover I think I’ll scream.

 

BBBOOORRRIIING — and a bit odd. The second picture there is of Helen Caldicott
and the quote actually reads,


The greatest thing a parent can do for his or her children is to work for
nuclear disarmament. Why make sure kids clean their teeth and eat healthy food if they’re not going to survive?

Hey, why bother getting out of bed every morning if I’m not going to survive?
If the anti-war movement ever wants to go mainstream, it’s going to have lose
the kooks.

The group could have also used an update on the fliers it was handing out.
I was handed a piece of paper saying that the impending war could kill over
500,000 Iraqi civilians and cost up to $1.4 trillion. Given that the war was
all but finished by then with rather minimal loss of life and a cost of less
than $100 billion for the military side of things, it seemed like I’d stepped
through the looking glass into an alternate universe.

 

About 100 yards away from the anti-war folks is a monument commemorating Sept.
11. Many of the same folks who were involved in the anti-war efforts visa vis
Iraq were also the folks who were complaining that the war in Afghanistan would
cause mass starvation, lead to further terrorist attacks, etc., etc. Rather
than recognize that what happened on Sept. 11 was something dramatically new,
the anti-war movement simply shoved Afghanistan and then Iraq into the same
old tired script.

Note: As a public service, I’ve included all of the photographs I took of the protests on April 16, 2003 here. These are free to use for any purpose provided you credit me, Brian Carnell, as the photographer. Take them, edit them, republish them, whatever.