Slashdot Know Nothings Link to Spiritual Kin in UK

Thi Slashdot entry claims that, “Movie Industry Blames Texting for Bad Box Office.” Of course if you actually read the article that is linked to — something Slashdot editors stopped doing years ago, you find that the story doesn’t quote a single person from the movie industry as even suggesting that text messaging has impacted the box office. In fact it’s apparent if you know anything about movies that the author of the article doesn’t have the first clue about box office grosses. Hey, Slashdot should hire that guy — he’d fit right in.

Washington State Substitute Senate Bill 5179

CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT


SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5179




58th Legislature
2003 Regular Session
Passed by the Senate April 25, 2003
YEAS 35 NAYS 13




President of the Senate

Passed by the House April 23, 2003
YEAS 52 NAYS 46




Speaker of the House of Representatives



CERTIFICATE

I, Milton H. Doumit, Jr., Secretary of the
Senate of the State of Washington, do
hereby certify that the attached is
SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5179 as passed
by the Senate and the House of
Representatives on the dates hereon set
forth.




Secretary
Approved











Governor of the State of Washington
FILED









Secretary of State
State of Washington
_____________________________________________

SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5179
_____________________________________________

AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE

Passed Legislature - 2003 Regular Session

State of Washington 58th Legislature 2003 Regular Session

By Senate Committee on Parks, Fish & Wildlife (originally sponsored
by Senators Oke, Mulliken, Rasmussen and T. Sheldon)

READ FIRST TIME 02/11/03.


AN ACT Relating to body-gripping traps; amending RCW 77.08.010,
77.15.194, 77.65.450, 77.65.460, 77.32.545, and 77.15.198; adding new
sections to chapter 77.12 RCW; repealing RCW 77.15.192; and declaring an
emergency.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

{+ NEW SECTION. +} Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 77.12 RCW
to read as follows:
(1) The legislature finds that a professionally managed and regulated
trapping program is not only vital to the health of Washington's wildlife
populations, but is also consistent with the state's obligations to manage
all natural resources in trust for the common good of all citizens.
(2) The legislature further finds that it is in the interest of all of
the citizens of Washington to ensure that all trapping is done in accordance
with sound scientific wildlife management principles using humane methods as
set forth in this act. It is the legislature's intent to implement a sound
furbearer management program, administered using sound science by the
department of fish and wildlife, that addresses an animal problem as defined
in RCW 77.08.010.
(3) The legislature further finds that humanely regulated trapping
practices used to control animal problems contribute positively to the
economic well-being of the state of Washington, to public health and welfare
by assisting to control the spread of animal-borne disease, and to the
protection of private and public property from damage resulting from
uncontrolled animal populations.
(4) The legislature further finds that the sale, trade, or barter of
wild animal pelts is consistent with the legislature's intent not to waste a
valuable wildlife resource.
(5) The legislature recognizes that among the choices available for the
trapping of animals, some may cause pain and suffering in the animals
captured. The legislature further recognizes that some trapping methods can
capture animals that are not targeted, including pets. It is the policy of
the state of Washington to minimize the use of indiscriminate or painful
traps and to use all traps humanely. When lethal trapping methods are used,
such methods must be used in the most humane way that accomplishes the goal
of reducing animal problems. All trappers in the state should use all
practicable means necessary to avoid the capture of a nontargeted animal.

Sec. 2. RCW 77.08.010 and 2002 c 281 s 2 are each amended to read as
follows:
As used in this title or rules adopted under this title, unless the
context clearly requires otherwise:
(1) "Director" means the director of fish and wildlife.
(2) "Department" means the department of fish and wildlife.
(3) "Commission" means the state fish and wildlife commission.
(4) "Person" means and includes an individual; a corporation; a public
or private entity or organization; a local, state, or federal agency; all
business organizations, including corporations and partnerships; or a group
of two or more individuals acting with a common purpose whether acting in an
individual, representative, or official capacity.
(5) "Fish and wildlife officer" means a person appointed and
commissioned by the director, with authority to enforce this title and rules
adopted pursuant to this title, and other statutes as prescribed by the
legislature. Fish and wildlife officer includes a person commissioned before
June 11, 1998, as a wildlife agent or a fisheries patrol officer.
(6) "Ex officio fish and wildlife officer" means a commissioned officer
of a municipal, county, state, or federal agency having as its primary
function the enforcement of criminal laws in general, while the officer is in
the appropriate jurisdiction. The term "ex officio fish and wildlife
officer" includes special agents of the national marine fisheries service,
state parks commissioned officers, United States fish and wildlife special
agents, department of natural resources enforcement officers, and United
States forest service officers, while the agents and officers are within
their respective jurisdictions.
(7) "To hunt" and its derivatives means an effort to kill, injure,
capture, or harass a wild animal or wild bird.
(8) "To trap" and its derivatives means a method of hunting using
devices to capture wild animals or wild birds.
(9) "To fish," "to harvest," and "to take," and their derivatives means
an effort to kill, injure, harass, or catch a fish or shellfish.
(10) "Open season" means those times, manners of taking, and places or
waters established by rule of the commission for the lawful hunting, fishing,
taking, or possession of game animals, game birds, game fish, food fish, or
shellfish that conform to the special restrictions or physical descriptions
established by rule of the commission or that have otherwise been deemed
legal to hunt, fish, take, harvest, or possess by rule of the commission.
"Open season" includes the first and last days of the established time.
(11) "Closed season" means all times, manners of taking, and places or
waters other than those established by rule of the commission as an open
season. "Closed season" also means all hunting, fishing, taking, or
possession of game animals, game birds, game fish, food fish, or shellfish
that do not conform to the special restrictions or physical descriptions
established by rule of the commission as an open season or that have not
otherwise been deemed legal to hunt, fish, take, harvest, or possess by rule
of the commission as an open season.
(12) "Closed area" means a place where the hunting of some or all
species of wild animals or wild birds is prohibited.
(13) "Closed waters" means all or part of a lake, river, stream, or
other body of water, where fishing or harvesting is prohibited.
(14) "Game reserve" means a closed area where hunting for all wild
animals and wild birds is prohibited.
(15) "Bag limit" means the maximum number of game animals, game birds,
or game fish which may be taken, caught, killed, or possessed by a person, as
specified by rule of the commission for a particular period of time, or as to
size, sex, or species.
(16) "Wildlife" means all species of the animal kingdom whose members
exist in Washington in a wild state. This includes but is not limited to
mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, and invertebrates. The term
"wildlife" does not include feral domestic mammals, old world rats and mice
of the family Muridae of the order Rodentia, or those fish, shellfish, and
marine invertebrates classified as food fish or shellfish by the director.
The term "wildlife" includes all stages of development and the bodily parts
of wildlife members.
(17) "Wild animals" means those species of the class Mammalia whose
members exist in Washington in a wild state and the species Rana catesbeiana
(bullfrog). The term "wild animal" does not include feral domestic mammals
or old world rats and mice of the family Muridae of the order Rodentia.
(18) "Wild birds" means those species of the class Aves whose members
exist in Washington in a wild state.
(19) "Protected wildlife" means wildlife designated by the commission
that shall not be hunted or fished.
(20) "Endangered species" means wildlife designated by the commission as
seriously threatened with extinction.
(21) "Game animals" means wild animals that shall not be hunted except
as authorized by the commission.
(22) "Fur-bearing animals" means game animals that shall not be trapped
except as authorized by the commission.
(23) "Game birds" means wild birds that shall not be hunted except as
authorized by the commission.
(24) "Predatory birds" means wild birds that may be hunted throughout
the year as authorized by the commission.
(25) "Deleterious exotic wildlife" means species of the animal kingdom
not native to Washington and designated as dangerous to the environment or
wildlife of the state.
(26) "Game farm" means property on which wildlife is held or raised for
commercial purposes, trade, or gift. The term "game farm" does not include
publicly owned facilities.
(27) "Person of disability" means a permanently disabled person who is
not ambulatory without the assistance of a wheelchair, crutches, or similar
devices.
(28) "Fish" includes all species classified as game fish or food fish by
statute or rule, as well as all fin fish not currently classified as food
fish or game fish if such species exist in state waters. The term "fish"
includes all stages of development and the bodily parts of fish species.
(29) "Raffle" means an activity in which tickets bearing an individual
number are sold for not more than twenty-five dollars each and in which a
permit or permits are awarded to hunt or for access to hunt big game animals
or wild turkeys on the basis of a drawing from the tickets by the person or
persons conducting the raffle.
(30) "Youth" means a person fifteen years old for fishing and under
sixteen years old for hunting.
(31) "Senior" means a person seventy years old or older.
(32) "License year" means the period of time for which a recreational
license is valid. The license year begins April 1st, and ends March 31st.
(33) "Saltwater" means those marine waters seaward of river mouths.
(34) "Freshwater" means all waters not defined as saltwater including,
but not limited to, rivers upstream of the river mouth, lakes, ponds, and
reservoirs.
(35) "State waters" means all marine waters and fresh waters within
ordinary high water lines and within the territorial boundaries of the state.
(36) "Offshore waters" means marine waters of the Pacific Ocean outside
the territorial boundaries of the state, including the marine waters of other
states and countries.
(37) "Concurrent waters of the Columbia river" means those waters of the
Columbia river that coincide with the Washington-Oregon state boundary.
(38) "Resident" means a person who has maintained a permanent place of
abode within the state for at least ninety days immediately preceding an
application for a license, has established by formal evidence an intent to
continue residing within the state, and who is not licensed to hunt or fish
as a resident in another state.
(39) "Nonresident" means a person who has not fulfilled the
qualifications of a resident.
(40) "Shellfish" means those species of marine and freshwater
invertebrates that have been classified and that shall not be taken except as
authorized by rule of the commission. The term "shellfish" includes all
stages of development and the bodily parts of shellfish species.
(41) "Commercial" means related to or connected with buying, selling, or
bartering.
(42) "To process" and its derivatives mean preparing or preserving fish,
wildlife, or shellfish.
(43) "Personal use" means for the private use of the individual taking
the fish or shellfish and not for sale or barter.
(44) "Angling gear" means a line attached to a rod and reel capable of
being held in hand while landing the fish or a hand-held line operated
without rod or reel.
(45) "Fishery" means the taking of one or more particular species of
fish or shellfish with particular gear in a particular geographical area.
(46) "Limited-entry license" means a license subject to a license
limitation program established in chapter 77.70 RCW.
(47) "Seaweed" means marine aquatic plant species that are dependent
upon the marine aquatic or tidal environment, and exist in either an attached
or free floating form, and includes but is not limited to marine aquatic
plants in the classes Chlorophyta, Phaeophyta, and Rhodophyta.
(48) "Trafficking" means offering, attempting to engage, or engaging in
sale, barter, or purchase of fish, shellfish, wildlife, or deleterious exotic
wildlife.
(49) "Invasive species" means a plant species or a nonnative animal
species that either:
(a) Causes or may cause displacement of, or otherwise threatens, native
species in their natural communities;
(b) Threatens or may threaten natural resources or their use in the
state;
(c) Causes or may cause economic damage to commercial or recreational
activities that are dependent upon state waters; or
(d) Threatens or harms human health.
(50) "Prohibited aquatic animal species" means an invasive species of
the animal kingdom that has been classified as a prohibited aquatic animal
species by the commission.
(51) "Regulated aquatic animal species" means a potentially invasive
species of the animal kingdom that has been classified as a regulated aquatic
animal species by the commission.
(52) "Unregulated aquatic animal species" means a nonnative animal
species that has been classified as an unregulated aquatic animal species by
the commission.
(53) "Unlisted aquatic animal species" means a nonnative animal species
that has not been classified as a prohibited aquatic animal species, a
regulated aquatic animal species, or an unregulated aquatic animal species by
the commission.
(54) "Aquatic plant species" means an emergent, submersed, partially
submersed, free-floating, or floating-leaving plant species that grows in or
near a body of water or wetland.
{+ (55) "Body-gripping trap" means a steel trap that grips an animal's
body or body part, including steel-jawed foothold trap, neck snare, or foot
snare.
(56) "Raw fur" means a pelt that has not been processed for purposes of
retail sale.
(57) "Animal problem" means damage, injury, or reasonable threat of
damage or injury, caused by furbearing mammals, unclassified wildlife, or
deleterious exotic wildlife to: Public or private property or resources;
livestock or other domestic animals; or human health or safety.
(58) "Nuisance wildlife" means moles, mice, rats, mountain beavers,
gophers, nutria, and other wildlife so designated by the commission by rule.
(59) "Nuisance bird problem" means damage, injury, or reasonable threat
of damage or injury, caused by avian species to: Public or private property
or resources; human health; or public safety.
(60) "Programmatic trapping permit" means a permit issued by the
director for the following purposes: (a) For furbearer management unit
purposes; (b) to prevent damage or injury, or a reasonable threat of +} {+
damage or injury, to (i) public or private property or resources; (ii)
livestock or other domestic animals; (iii) agricultural, timber, and
horticultural resources; (iv) human health or safety; or (v) other purposes
so designated by the commission by rule.
(61) "Conditional use trapping permit" means an emergency permit,
limited to specific times, purposes, and areas, issued by the director to
address unanticipated and immediate damage or injury to public or private
property or resources or other purposes designated by the commission by rule.
(62) "Restricted use trapping permit" means a permit issued by the
director to protect either sensitive or endangered species and habitat, or
both, or other purposes designated by the commission by rule. +}

Sec. 3. RCW 77.15.194 and 2001 c 1 s 3 are each amended to read as
follows:
{+ It is the duty of every trapper to ensure that all trapping is done
humanely. To ensure that this goal is met, all trappers must abide by the
following: +}
(1) It is unlawful to use or authorize the use of any (({- steel-jawed
leghold trap, neck snare, or other -})) body-gripping trap to capture any
mammal (({- for recreation or commerce in fur -})) {+ without a permit issued
by the director, except no trap with teeth or serrated edges may be
permitted. The director may only issue a permit under this section for the
purposes of addressing an animal problem, nuisance bird problem, capturing
live raptors for falconry, for furbearer management program needs, or for
conducting scientific research +}.
(2) It is unlawful to knowingly buy, sell, barter, or otherwise
exchange, or offer to buy, sell, barter, or otherwise exchange the raw fur of
a mammal or a mammal that has been trapped in (({- this state with a steel-
jawed leghold trap or any other body-gripping trap, whether or not pursuant
to permit.
(3) It is unlawful to use or authorize the use of any steel-jawed
leghold trap or any other body-gripping trap to capture any animal, except as
provided in subsections (4) and (5) of this section.
(4) Nothing in this section prohibits the use of a Conibear trap in
water, a padded leghold trap, or a nonstrangling type foot snare with a
special permit granted by [the] director under (a) through (d) of this
subsection. Issuance of the special permits shall be governed by -} {- rules
adopted by the department and in accordance with the requirements of this
section. Every person granted a special permit to use a trap or device
listed in this subsection shall check the trap or device at least every
twenty-four hours.
(a) Nothing in this section prohibits the director, in consultation with
the department of social and health services or the United States department
of health and human services from granting a permit to use traps listed in
this subsection for the purpose of protecting people from threats to their
health and safety.
(b) Nothing in this section prohibits the director from granting a
special permit to use traps listed in this subsection to a person who applies
for such a permit in writing, and who establishes that there exists on a
property an animal problem that has not been and cannot be reasonably abated
by the use of nonlethal control tools, including but not limited to guard
animals, electric fencing, or box and cage traps, or if such nonlethal means
cannot be reasonably applied. Upon making a finding in writing that the
animal problem has not been and cannot be reasonably abated by nonlethal
control tools or if the tools cannot be reasonably applied, the director may
authorize the use, setting, placing, or maintenance of the traps for a period
not to exceed thirty days.
(c) Nothing in this section prohibits the director from granting a
special permit to department employees or agents to use traps listed in this
subsection where the use of the traps is the only practical means of
protecting threatened or endangered species as designated under RCW
77.08.010.
(d) Nothing in this section prohibits the director from issuing a permit
to use traps listed in this subsection, excluding Conibear traps, for the
conduct of legitimate wildlife research.
(5) Nothing in this section prohibits the United States fish and
wildlife service, its employees or agents, from using a trap listed in
subsection (4) of this section where the fish and wildlife service
determines, in consultation with the director, that the use of such traps is
necessary to protect species listed as threatened or endangered under the
federal endangered species act (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.) -})) {+
violation of subsection (1) of this section. To prevent wastage, nothing in
this section prohibits the sale, barter, or +} {+ trade of an animal carcass
or pelt, or the donation of an animal carcass or pelt for scientific research
or public health training lawfully taken under this title.
(3)(a) All trapping of wild animals using body-gripping traps must be
conducted by trappers licensed by the department under RCW 77.65.450, under a
permit from the director, and in accordance with the rules developed by the
commission as they relate to wildlife trapping. However, nothing in this
section prohibits the use of commonly used traps by public or private
property owners or their agents operating on their property to control the
following nuisance wildlife: Moles, mice, rats, mountain beavers, gophers,
and nutria.
(b) Furbearing mammals may not be taken from the wild and held alive for
sale or personal use. All trapping of furbearing mammals must be conducted
in furtherance of a wildlife trapping program being implemented by the
department for an animal problem, for scientific research, or for mammal
population management as defined by the commission by rule.
(c) Wildlife unintentionally trapped while trapping to manage an animal
problem, or while conducting scientific research, must, if possible, be
released unharmed immediately upon discovery. The commission may adopt by
rule or guideline procedures for the handling of any animal that is unable to
be released unharmed.
(d) Lawfully trapped wild animals, if not intended for release, must be
humanely dispatched, or if intended for release, must be either immediately
released or immediately taken to a rehabilitation center, if necessary. The
commission may adopt by rule or guideline procedures for the humane dispatch
of captured animals.
(4)(a) It is unlawful for a licensed trapper to fail to complete and
submit to the department a report of catch postmarked on or before April 20th
of each year. The report must be submitted to the department regardless of
trapping success, and indicate the number, general location, and species of
all animals captured, including those animals captured that were not part of
an animal problem. The report must also include details for domestic pets
captured in traps, the circumstances for each specific incident, and if the
domestic pet was injured or released unharmed. Trappers who fail to submit
an accurate report of catch shall have their trapping privileges suspended
for one +} {+ year. False reports are considered failure to report. It is
the responsibility of each licensed trapper to obtain and submit a report of
catch on forms provided by the department.
(b) The department shall maintain and analyze all catch reports received
pursuant to (a) of this subsection. Data collected on catch reports must be
presented to the appropriate legislative committees by November 30th of each
year.
(5) Federal wildlife management agencies and their employees and agents,
while acting lawfully within the scope of their authority, are not subject to
the provisions of this section +}.

{+ NEW SECTION. +} Sec. 4. A new section is added to chapter 77.12 RCW
to read as follows:
The commission shall adopt appropriate rules regarding the types of
traps and bait for use in capturing wildlife to ensure the humane treatment
of captured animals. In adopting these rules, the commission may take into
consideration the effectiveness of various trap sizes, approved best
management practices, and the habitats in which the traps may be used. These
rules must address the time intervals during which specific traps must be
checked and animals removed. These rules may not allow for the use of traps
with teeth or serrated edges or a neck or body snare attached to a spring
pole or any spring pole type device. The commission must also adopt rules
for the appropriate disposal of carcasses.

{+ NEW SECTION. +} Sec. 5. A new section is added to chapter 77.12 RCW
to read as follows:
The department shall institute a furbearer management program that
addresses animal problems and shall only issue programmatic trapping,
conditional use, or restricted use trapping permits, as those terms are
defined in RCW 77.08.010, and trapping licenses or propose rules consistent
with this program.

Sec. 6. RCW 77.65.450 and 1991 sp.s. c 7 s 3 are each amended to read
as follows:
A state trapping license {+ in combination with a programmatic trapping
permit, conditional use trapping permit, or restricted use trapping permit
from the director +} allows the holder to trap fur-bearing animals throughout
the state {+ in accordance with the rules adopted by the commission under
section 4 of this act +}; however, a trapper may not place traps on {+ public
or +} private property without permission of the owner, lessee, or tenant
where the land is improved and apparently used, or where the land is fenced
or enclosed in a manner designed to exclude intruders or to indicate a
property boundary line, or where notice is given by posting in a conspicuous
manner. A state trapping license is void on April 1st following the date of
issuance. The fee for this license is thirty-six dollars for residents
sixteen years of age or older, (({- fifteen -})) {+ twenty +} dollars for
residents under sixteen years of age, and (({- one -})) {+ two +} hundred
(({- eighty -})) dollars for nonresidents. {+ Licensed trappers age fifteen
years and younger must be under the direct supervision of a licensed adult
trapper when engaged in trapping activities. The fee for a programmatic
trapping permit for residents sixteen years of age or older and nonresidents,
for animal problems as that term is defined in RCW 77.08.010, is twelve
dollars and fifty cents. A trapping license is valid for using body-gripping
traps in combination with a permit for the control of animal problems, as
that term is defined in RCW 77.08.010, or for scientific research. The live
capture of raptors for falconry, or scientific research, by use of a foot
snare or other body-gripping trap may also be authorized by rule of the
commission. +}

Sec. 7. RCW 77.65.460 and 1987 c 506 s 82 are each amended to read as
follows:
{+ All p +}ersons purchasing a state trapping license (({- for the first
time -})) {+ after April 1, 2003, +} shall (({- present certification of
completion of -})) {+ complete +} a course of instruction in safe, humane,
and proper trapping techniques or pass an examination to establish that the
applicant has the requisite knowledge. {+ Licensed trappers who have been
active in state-regulated trapping since November 2000 are exempt from this
provision. +}
The director shall establish a program for training persons in trapping
techniques and responsibilities {+ in urban, suburban, and rural settings +},
including the use of trapping devices designed to painlessly capture or
instantly kill. The director shall cooperate with (({- national and state
animal, humane -})) {+ recognized Washington state based animal shelters,
wildlife rehabilitation centers, and similar entities +} {+ providing animal
care and rehabilitation services +}, hunter education, and {+ Washington
state based +} trapping organizations in the development {+ and instruction
+} of (({- a curriculum -})) {+ trapper training +}. Upon successful
completion of the course, trainees shall receive a trapper's training
certificate signed by an authorized instructor. This certificate is evidence
of compliance with this section.

Sec. 8. RCW 77.32.545 and 1998 c 190 s 121 are each amended to read as
follows:
A property owner, lessee, or tenant may remove a trap placed on the
owner's, lessee's, or tenant's posted or fenced property by a trapper. {+ A
property owner, lessee, or tenant who discovers a trap placed on any portion
of his or her property that is not authorized by the owner, lessee, or
tenant, may report the finding to the department, including whether a live
animal is captured in the trap. The commission may adopt by rule or
guideline procedures for the handling of live animals discovered in such
traps. +}
Trappers shall attach to the chain of their traps or devices a legible
metal tag with either the department identification number of the trapper or
the name and address of the trapper in English letters not less than one-
eighth inch in height.
When a property owner, lessee, or tenant presents a trapper
identification number to the department for a trap found upon the property of
the owner, lessee, or tenant and requests identification of the trapper, the
department shall provide the requestor with the name and address of the
trapper. Prior to disclosure of the trapper's name and address, the
department shall obtain the name and address of the requesting individual in
writing and after disclosing the trapper's name and address to the requesting
individual, the requesting individual's name and address shall be disclosed
in writing to the trapper whose name and address was disclosed.

Sec. 9. RCW 77.15.198 and 2001 c 1 s 5 are each amended to read as
follows:
Any person who violates RCW 77.15.194 or 77.15.196 is guilty of a gross
misdemeanor. In addition to appropriate criminal penalties, the director
shall revoke the trapping license of any person convicted of a {+ repeat +}
violation of RCW 77.15.194 or 77.15.196. The director shall not issue the
violator a trapping license for a period of five years following the
revocation. (({- Following a subsequent conviction for a violation of RCW
77.15.194 or 77.15.196 by the same person, the director shall not issue a
trapping license to the person at any time -})) {+ A person may not be
granted a new trapping license following a revocation under this section
unless that person completes the education program outlined in RCW 77.65.460
not more than one year before a new license is granted +}.

{+ NEW SECTION. +} Sec. 10. RCW 77.15.192 (Definitions) and 2001 c 1 s
2 are each repealed.

{+ NEW SECTION. +} Sec. 11. This act is necessary for the immediate
preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state
government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect
immediately.

--- END ---

Woman Sets New Domino Toppling Record

China’s Ma Lihua has set a new solo record for domino toppling, after spending six weeks setting up more than 300,000 dominos in a chain just to topple them. The dominos stretched for 15 km, according to the BBC, and took six minutes to fall.

Source:

Domino record toppled in Singapore. David Bottomley, BBC, August 18, 2003.

The Future Is Right Now for Performance Enhancing Drugs

The BBC had a story about performance enhancing drugs which addresses some of the issues raised a couple years ago in this thread at Seth’s web site about the use of PEDs in cycling (if you don’t follow cycling, the short version is that the sport has had a series of high profile scandals involving the use of performance enhancing drugs).

The main problem with existing PEDs, in my opinion, is that they are not safe. But at the same time, most sports governing bodies also ban drugs that are barely PEDs and that are perfectly safe (like stupidly disqualifying gymnasts because they took OTC cold remedies).

The BBC reports on the International Olympic Committee’s concession that it will not have a test in places before the 2004 Olympics to detect athletes who are using Humane Growth Hormone to enhance their performance. The BBC quotes Olivier Rabin, science director of the World Anti-Dopin Agency, as saying,

HGH is one of the main concerns we have. It’s quite a challenge. There are currently six different countries working on the detection of HGH. We would like to have something in place for the Olympics, but this (attemt at) detection has been going on for years. History has shown that you cannot always get tests ready on time, because science does not move forward smoothly.

In fact, the WADA was supposed to have an HGH test ready for the Sydney Olympics in 2000.

I do not know if HGH can be used safely by athletes to improve their performance, but if it can why should we even try to ban its use anymore than we should try to ban any of the other high tech devices and methods that are used to push human performance well beyond what would have been possible 40 or 50 years ago?

One objection is that if PEDs use is widely distributed, then all the competitors end up at the same relative position afterward. So, for example, if a PED increases a runner’s speed in a 10k race by 15 seconds, then all the competitors will take the drug and end up going 15 seconds faster without much of a shakeout in the order of finishing.

But, again, this seems like an objection that could be levelled at almost any sports innovation. Using 300 lb. linemen in the NFL gave the teams who initially adopted that practice a huge (pun intended) advantage. Today everybody uses 300 lbs. linemen and the relative advantage has disappeared.

Similarly, baseball teams whose players began serious weight training likely enjoyed a small advantage over their competitors, but now that weight training and other conditioning methods are widespread, the relative advantage has disappeared (i.e., all teams — except our pathetic Detroit Tigers — hit home runs today at a level above previous generations, though home runs are still distributed in similar ways between teams).

The bottom line is that people watch sports, in part, to see other human beings reaching and even exceeding their potential. People want to see the baseball star who can hit one or two more home runs in a season than anyone else ever has, or who can run 100 meter just a tenth of a second faster than anyone else in the world has.

Why should we hamper such athletes by banning the use of safe performance enhancing drugs, especially given that the future is likely to see treatments that are a) increasingly safe, b) increasingly effective, and b) like HGH, increasingly hard to detect.

Debate Over Beaver Trapping in Massachusetts

In 1996, the Massachusetts legislature passed a ban on the use of body-gripping traps. In the seven years since, the beaver population in the state has tripled to 70,000. Some lawmakers want changes to the 1996 law to bring back some traps banned under the law.

Currently, the law in Massachusetts reads,

Chapter 131: Section 80A Leghold traps and certain other devices restricted; punishment

Section 80A. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a person shall not use, set, place, maintain, manufacture or possess any trap for the purpose of capturing furbearing mammals, except for common type mouse and rat traps, nets, and box or cage type traps, as otherwise permitted by law. A box or cage type trap is one that confines the whole animal without grasping any part of the animal, including Hancock or Bailey’s type live trap for beavers. Other than nets and common type mouse or rat traps, traps designed to capture and hold a furbearing mammal by gripping the mammal’s body, or body part are prohibited, including steel jaw leghold traps, padded leghold traps, and snares.

The above provision shall not apply to the use of prohibited devices by federal and state departments of health or municipal boards of health for the purpose of protection from threats to human health and safety.

State Rep. Mark Carron (D) wants the state to legalize “soft catch traps” which use rubber pads instead of metal teeth on the jaws of the trap. State Rep. George Peterson Jr. (R) has introduced legislation that would legalize conibear traps — a metal trap that is designed to kill animals by applying great force to the animal’s neck.

The law banning traps was amended in 2000 to allow public health boards to authorize the setting of traps, dam breachings, or waterflow prevention devices. A major problem with the large beaver population is flooding created by beaver dams.

But such measures are expensive, and don’t seem flexible enough to deal with the problem. The Boston Globe notes, for example, that the town of Sturbridge installed 12 grates to protect culverts from being stopped up by beavers. But the town currently still has to spend about $10,000 annually just keeping those grates clear of debris.

Gregory Morris, director of the Department of Public Works for Sturbridge, told the Boston Globe,

There is most definitely a huge issue here. If we get an 8- or 10-inch rainstorm, there will be roads totally wiped out. It’s [the grates] not solving the problem or reducing the waterflow, it’s strictly to maintain. I would most definitely like to see trapping come back.

Sources:

Beavers’ rule gets swampy. Brendan McCarthy, Boston Globe, July 8, 2003.

Beavers, Humans Harmonize ‘Deceiver’ Seen As Safe Way To Limit Damage. Kathy McCabe, Boston Globe, July 17, 2003.

House Bill, No. 200. Massachusetts Legislature, 2003.

EPA Ban on Human Pesticide Data Overturned

In 2001 the Environmental Protection Agency issued a moratorium on using data from human tests to formulate acceptable levels of exposure to pesticides. EPA chief Christie Whitman defended the moratorium at that time saying that the human exposure data could not be used until the EPA had thoroughly investigated the ethical and scientific acceptability of such tests.

Representatives of pesticide producing industries sued arguing that the EPA could not issue such a moratorium without first issuing a public notice of its plans and inviting public feedback. On June 3, a federal appeals court agreed and ordered the agency to accept human test data on a case-by-case basis until it establishes a new regulation under existing procedures.

EPA spokeswoman Lisa Harrison told the Associated Press that the decision would not really change much at the EPA as the agency is already on track to create new regulations related to human clinical trials of pesticides. “It actually doesn’t impact us all that much, because we were proceeding on that track,” Harrison told the Associated Press.

Although clinical trials of pesticides are done with willing volunteers, environmental groups generally oppose them as being unethical and instead want pesticide manufacturers to focus exclusively on animal toxicity tests. Animal rights groups, on the other hand, want the EPA to reduce the number of animal tests involved in testing chemicals.

Richard Wiles of the Environment Working Group told the Associated Press,

We hope that the EPA bans the use of human studies by regulation. It’s completely unethical to directly dose humans with pesticides to see what the toxic effects are. We think that’s self-evident.

Source:

EPA told to weight human pesticide test data. Elizabeth Shogren, The Los Angeles Times, June 4, 2003.

EPA halt of human test data overturned. Associated Press, June 3, 2003.