Pirates of the Amazon is/was an interesting experiment that quickly got a cease-and-desist letter from Amazon.com. For a day, however, the site hosted a Firefox extension that assisted the user in pirating works for sale at Amazon. As TorrentFreak put it,
An add-on for the Firefox browser called ‘Pirates of the Amazon’ makes it possible to shop at the Amazon store but leave without paying a dime. Instead, on Amazon product pages the add-on integreates links to ‘free’ copies on The Pirate Bay.
. . .
When the add-on is installed, it integrates a new “download 4 free” button into the Amazon product page when the same article is also available via The Pirate Bay. It works for CDs, DVDs, games, books and basically all products that can be converted to a digital format.
Now that is an interesting mashup. As TorrentFreak noted there are plenty of Greasemonky scripts out there that do much the same thing for Last.FM, IMDB, Rotten Tomatoes, etc. It’s not like it is rocket science to do this with Greasemonkey.
If you’re curious, TorrentFreak is maintaining a backup of the Firefox extension here.
Earlier this month, Amazon.Com expanded its wish list feature by adding a Universal Wish List Button. It’s a bookmarklet that you press on any page featuring something you’d like, and up pops a dialogue box with a few options to fill in (price, etc.) and the item then gets added to your Amazon Wish List.
Jungle Disk recently announced its 2.0 release. If you’re looking for a secure, online data backup system, this is hands down the best consumer-level one. It is also the best for price/reliability, since it uses Amazon’s S3 storage which is 10 cents/gigabyte for data uploads and 15 cents/gigabyte/month for storage. There are cheaper options out there that will promise unlimited data backup for very small monthly charges, but their reliability and long-term fortunes are, at best, suspect.
With Amazon and Jungle Disk, the only thing limiting online backups is the anemic upstream bandwidth that most of us have (I feel lucky to have 2 megabits/second up). Even at 2mb/s, that’s a long time to upload the hundreds of gigs of data I need to back up.
Since data loss is never a good thing, I have a fairly robust backup system in place that involves backing up my most important data daily to external hard drives and then weekly to optical media. But being a bit paranoid, I’ve also always wanted some sort of way to back up my data to an online service so I could have a more robust, off-site backup solution as well.
There are a lot of companies in the online backup business these days, such as Mozy. But I have two sets of concerns about these services. First, as some users have complained, sites like Mozy are often not so great when it comes time to actually retrieve the data you’ve backed up. Second, Mozy and others use the sort of model that web hosts use — charging very low monthly prices betting that most users will only us a fraction of the service which will offset the folks who have lots of data to back up. Mozy, for example, advertises unlimited backups for $4.95/month.
I can see using those sorts of services for small backup sets, but I have about 300gb of data to backup.
Since October, I’ve been using Jungle Disk for on-line backup. Jungle Disk is basically just a backup front end for Amazon’s S3 storage utility. So all of my files are actually residing on Amazon’s servers, and the Jungle Disk application takes care of uploading all of my files and keeping my backup up-to-date.
The application itself costs $20. There is an optional Jungle Disk Plus service which basically uploads your files to a separate server before transferring to Amazon which allows things that S3 doesn’t support yet, such as large file resumes or block-level updates. Thats $1/month.
Storage charges, bandwidth and other charges are set and billed by Amazon. Amazon currently charges 15 cents/month/gigabyte for storage and 10 cents per gigabyte of bandwidth used in transferring files. So that 300gb of data I’ve currently got sitting on their servers is going to cost me $45/month. I consider that cheap given the peace of mind it gives me, but your mileage may vary.
All files are encrypted using 256 bit AES. I created a mind boggling long passphrase. The Jungle Disk Plus service does offer some optional features such as web-based access to your files that, IMO, reduce the level of security too much so I simply don’t use them.
One of the big issues, at least in the United States, is upload speeds since most of us do not have anywhere near the bandwidth leaving our homes that we do for downloads. My cable company recently offered 10mbs down/1mbs up, and I signed up for that before starting to backup all my files using Jungle Disk.
Connecting directly to Amazon’s S3, I typically got 720kbs up — or about 324 megabytes per hour. After Jungle Disk launched their Jungle Disk Plus offering, most of the time my connection maxed out so I was getting 990-1024kbs up or about 461 megabytes per hour. When you’ve got 300gb of data to upload, that’s still a very long upload. In all, it took about two months for my backup job to finally upload everything. Now, Jungle Disk simply checks at 2 a.m. to see what new/changed files have been added and takes care of those automatically.
There are a lot of things I really like about Jungle Disk, but probably the biggest feature as opposed to all of the other services I’ve seen out there is how easy it is to retrieve files. Forget using some special software or going through some convoluted process. Jungle Disk simply maps your S3 storage as a network drive. From Windows Explorer I can navigate through my stored files, find the one I’m looking for, and simply copy and paste to retrieve it. The software does come with a more robust feature for retrieving large amounts of data, say in the case of a catastrophic local data loss, but it is nice to simply be able to retrieve data through a standard file manager interface.
Jungle Disk also does a nice job of archiving previous versions of changed files and deleted files. Archiving older versions of files is completely optional, however, and I suspect many people will disable it given the potential costs.
Overall, my experience with Jungle Disk/Amazon S3 has been outstanding. The only thing keeping from uploading all 20TB of data I’ve got archived in one form or another is a) bandwidth and b) price. But over time, the bandwidth available to the home is only going to increase, while storage costs are only going to decline. For now, this is a great solution for off-site backup of data that would, at least in my case, be impossible to recreate.
I am very meticulous about the way I back up my data. I run daily diff backups, followed by weekly complete backups of the 200gb or so of data I consider absolutely critical (i.e., e-mail, pictures, World of Warcraft combat logs, etc.) I then bun that data to writable DVDs which I then neatly file in my basement, with a couple of copies kept at various locations other than my house in case of a catastrophic.
Still, I’d like even more redundancy and have recently been playing around with the Jungle Disk betas.
Jungle Disk is software for backing up important data online. It is a front-end program for Amazon’s S3 online storage service.
There are a couple of advantages that Jungle Disk has over other online backup systems.
The first is that it is very cheap. Amazon S3 charges just 20 cents per gigabyte to upload and then just 15 cents per gigabyte per month for storage. So if I upload my 200gb of data this month, it will cost me $40 for the bandwidth to transfer it and $30 to store it. Assuming I don’t make any changes, it will only cost me $30 per month to store the 200gb. If my hard drive crashed and I needed to download everything, again I’d be looking at $40 to transfer it all back to my computer.
The second thing is that, while others have noted, Amazon pretty much makes no promises about availability in order to limit its liability, data on S3 is stored across multiple servers at multiple locations. Nothing is certain, but I’m betting Amazon S3′s reliability is significantly better than what I can achieve with my Zip backups burned to DVD.
Also, the Jungle Disk application promises to have a lot of key features necessary to make an online backup application useful, such as preserving modification and other file data on S3 to make syncing data from the local drive to the online system viable.
The latest beta also adds an option to encrypt files with 256 bit AES as they are uploaded. For me, encryption is the single most important element to any online backup system — if I can’t be reasonably certain that my files are going to be safe from prying eyes in the event a server is compromised, count me out. 256 bit AES combined with a strong password more than satisfies my concerns.
So what, if any, downsides does something like Jungle Disk have. Hmm..ever try to upload 200gb worth of data over even a fast cable connection? Even at consistent 100kbs upload speeds, I’d be looking at roughly 555 hours to upload it all. Ugh. Once Jungle Disk is out of beta and has had a few months for the more security conscious to critique it, I’ll probably upload my data through the high speed connection at the university I attend rather than spend months doing so through the cable connection I’ve got.