My Generation Is So Screwed Without Social Security Reform

I support the complete privatization of Social Security, and would favor a lot more radical plans than the Bush administration is likely to propose. Even then, I can’t imagine any sort of meaningful reform will be enacted until it is far too late and the system is on the verge of collapse.

The thing about Social Security is the more you dig in to how the government is planning for the future, the more you learn just how screwed those of us who are going to have to support the retiring baby boomers are. For example, take this unbelievable nugget reported by the New York Times (emphasis added),

Tables published by the government’s National Center for Health Statistics show that life expectancy at birth was 47.3 years in 1900, rose to 68.2 by 1950 and reached 77.3 in 2002. The latest annual report of the Social Security trustees projects that life expectancy will increase just six years in the next seven decades, to 83 in 2075. A separate set of projections, by the Census Bureau, shows more rapid growth.

Claiming that life expectancy will increase by only 6 years by 2075 is ridiculous. The history of predictions on life expectancy is one prediction after another claiming that the previous few decades increase was unprecedented and would not be able to be repeated. Since there is no indication that average life expectancy is anywhere close to the theoretical limits of human life expectancy, estimates that low-ball the increase in life expectancy are foolish.

In fact, it’s likely going to be just the opposite — most of the increase in life expectancy in the 20th century occurred in the first half of the century due to efforts that reduced infant mortality. It wasn’t until the last half of the century that medical developments started significantly improving life expectancy of those already over 65. Since we’ve made so much progress on lowering mortality in the very young, the obvious place for further research — and where it is increasingly concentrated — is on diseases that kill middle aged and older individuals.

I suspect that over the next 70 years, the increase in life expectancy for those over 65 is going to begin to accelerate as information from the human genome, stem cell research, and a wide variety of other areas of inquiry that are still in their relative infancy start to mature and provide treatments for diseases typically associated with aging.

The good news — you’re likely to have a very high life expectancy if you’re relatively young today. The bad news — you’re going to be taxed to death to pay for retirees whose life expectancy is also going to grow.

Source:

Social Security Underestimates Future Life Spans, Critics Say. Robert Pear, The New York Times, December 31, 2004.

Key to Confronting Disaster — Look Busy

Watching the video and reading the stories coming out of Asia and Africa of the recent tsunami’s has been a bit surreal. It was hard enough to comprehend a single terrorist attack killing almost 3,000 people. Death on the scale of hundreds of thousands of people in a weekend is far beyond what I can comprehend. The death toll keeps increasing like some sort of one-sided sporting event.

One of the few visible touchstones of life-as-usual has been the media’s response and criticism — namely that the way to confront disasters is to simply look busy.

First it was Bush who was accused of being heartless for not rushing back to Washington, DC where he would have done who knows what? Maybe given teary-eyed speeches about feeling the pain of Indonesians?

Now the media turned the same sort of criticism to Kofi Annan (emphasis added)

Q: Mr. Secretary, picking up on Richard’s question, I think a lot of people are asking exactly why you waited three days on vacation in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, before you decided to fly back to New York in the face of this extraordinary crisis. Could you give us a full explanation of your thinking on that? Secondly, what kind of signal does that 72-hour delay send to the nations to which you are now appealing for greater help?

SG: First of all, there was action. It wasn’t inaction. We live in a world where you can operate from wherever you are. You know the world we live in now. You don’t have to be physically here to be dealing with the leaders and the Governments I have been dealing with. You don’t have to be physically here to be discussing with some of the agencies that we have done.

I came back here because we have reached a level that I wanted to have meetings with all the people that I have met with today. So, we have taken action. And I don’t have to be sitting in my office to take action. I think the same goes for you in your profession.

Annan is absolutely right — haven’t these idiot reporters heard of cell phones, fax machines, the Internet, video conferencing and dozens of other technologies which allow someone like Annan or Bush to conduct their business pretty much anywhere in the world? Getting on a plane and flying somewhere is just a frigging waste of time and money.

But this is what the media wants — regardless of the actual situation, make sure you look like you’re doing something. This goes back decades. For example, the New York Times in an editorial today calls for the United States to drastically increase foreign aid to the developing world to tackle issues like hunger.

But the countries that need the aid the most are also the countries that are the most corrupt and are unable to provide accountability for foreign aid. The United States and other countries and institutions spent decades throwing billions of dollars at developing countries with almost nothing to show for it today except perhaps for hundreds of millions squirreled away in private bank accounts by corrupt government officials.

That criticism, however, is beside the point. After all when the U.S. or the World Bank gives $100 million to tackle some problem, it looks busy, and the media are experts at rewarding style over substance.

The underlying problems that afflict developing countries where, say, hunger is still a major problem, are not the sort of problems that foreign aid can fix. And its silly to throw all that money away just to tell the media “we’re doing something.”

Sources:

Secretary-General Kofi Annan and UN’s Emergency Relief Coordinator Jan Egeland at press conference on Asian Tsunami disaster. December 30, 2004.

Real-World New Year’s Resolutions. Editorial, New York Times, December 31, 2004.

Slate’s Jack Shafer Demolishes Washington Post’s Alarmist Story on the Murder of Pregnant Women

The entire nation was shocked by reports earlier this month of the murder of 23-year-old Bobbie Jo Stinnett. What made Stinnett’s murder particularly shocking was that she was strangled and her baby was then cut from her womb, allegedly by Lisa Montgomery who prosecutors say has admitted the crime.

Stinnett’s murder led the Washington Post’s Donna St. George to pen a three-part series, alarmingly titled “Many New or Expectant Mothers Die Violent Deaths.” The text of the three part series describes the circumstances of the murder of a number of women by boyfriends and husband or ex-es and suggests that such murders are relatively common. St. George writes, for example, that,

A year-long examination by The Washington Post of death-record data in states across the country documents the killings of 1,367 pregnant women and new mothers since 1990. This is only part of the national toll, because no reliable system is in place to track such cases.

St. George goes on to quote Texas Woman’s University’s Judith McFarlane as saying that the 1,367 pregnant women is likely just the tip of the iceberg,

That’s a formidable number — and that’s just the tip. You can’t address a problem that we don’t document. You can’t reduce them. You can’t prevent them. In essence, they don’t exist.

But you don’t have to read very far through the article to realize there are serious problems with it. St. George is typical of mainstream media accounts of amorphous problems in which she simultaneously asserts that little is known about the extent of the problem, but goes on to claim that it must nonetheless be a widespread phenomenon.

Slate’s Jack Shafer noticed the obvious problems and wrote a story for that online magazine criticizing St. George for engaging in such alarmist journalism without much of anything to back up her claims. Shafer writes,

Of course, just one maternal homicide is one more than acceptable, so I’m not arguing with the urgency of St. George’s topic. But she ignores available data that might place the horrific numbers she’s collected into relevant context. According to the Department of Justice, total murders of women in the United States peaked in 1993 at 5,550. The number of murders of women by “intimates”?defined by the government as a spouse, ex-spouse, or boyfriend?has also been falling since 1993 (when there were 1,581), reaching its lowest level since 1976 in 2001 and 2002 (which had 1,202 murders each year). These trends are all the more positive when you factor in the dramatic increase in the U.S. population since that time.

St. George briefly alludes to this good news in a sidebar to Part 1: Criminologist Neil Websdale of Northern Arizona University cautions her about overstating the maternal-homicide problem. More than 1,000 women are killed each year in domestic clashes, Websdale tells her, the overwhelming majority of whom are not pregnant. But she promptly drops the subject. Why? Does she fear that these statistics will undermine her thesis?

But there is a bigger, devastating problem with St. George’s claims about the murder of pregnant women, and it has to do with her careful parsing of the claim that she documented “the killings of 1,367 pregnant women and new mothers since 1990.” As Shafer writes (emphasis added),

The pivotal research in her piece is “Enhanced Surveillance for Pregnancy-Associated Mortality–Maryland, 1993-1998,” a 2001 study of 247 “pregnancy-associated” deaths in Maryland between 1993 and 1998 published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. It found that “a pregnant or recently pregnant woman is more likely to be a victim of homicide than to die of any other cause,” which St. George quotes favorably.

But the horror of this JAMA study recedes as you read it. We all know what a pregnant woman is: someone who’s carrying a baby. But what is a “recently pregnant” woman? The JAMA study defines the phrase very broadly. By its definition, mothers who give birth are recently pregnant for the 365 days following delivery. Women whose pregnancies end for any reason are also recently pregnant for 365 days after termination. So, a woman who had an abortion, miscarried, or gave birth to a baby would qualify for inclusion in this mortality study if she died with a year of that event.

In fact of the women in the JAMA study that St. George relies on, there were only 50 homicides among the 247 deaths, and only 23 of those occurred while the woman was pregnant. None of which St. George could be bothered to include in her report.

Similarly, St. George notes that in a Maryland study, “slightly more than 10 percent of all homicides among women ages 14 to 44 happened to a pregnant or postpartum woman in the past decade.” But as Shafer notes, some back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that 10 percent of women 14 to 44 became pregnant during the same period of time, so its not exactly surprising that 10 percent of female victims of homicide happened to be pregnant at the time. Except, as Shafer notes, just like the JAMA study, the Maryland study also included women who were murdered after they gave birth, miscarried or had an abortion,

Because St. George’s group of Maryland murder victims includes postpartum women, this means the percentage of pregnant women murdered has got to be less than 10 percent. An unstated premise in St. George’s series is that the new findings refute the intuitive sense that pregnancy provides some protection from murder. But, examined closely, St. George’s reporting seems to support the idea that pregnant women are murdered less often than non-pregnant women.

Kudos to Shafer for such a thorough debunking of the Washington Post’s alarmism. Murders like that of pregnant women such as Stinnett or Laci Peterson are certainly horrifying, but they are horrifying in part because they are so rare. St. George’s attempt to imply that maternal murder may be on the rise is undermined by the very information sources she relies upon.

Sources:

Body Count: Doing the math on the Washington Post’s momicide series. Jack Shafer, Slate.Com, December 24, 2004.

The Muddled Maternal Murder Series: A Washington Post investigation loses its way. Jack Shafer, Slate.Com, December 20, 2004.

Many New or Expectant Mothers Die Violent Deaths. Donna St. George, Washington Post, December 19, 2004.

Christmas Gift from Macrobyte — Improved Performance and Feature Updates

I haven’t posted a fan letter about Conversant in awhile, but since Macrobyte just implemented a number of upgrades/new features this is a good time to re-visit my content management system of choice.

The thing that continues to excite me about Conversant is how it well it balances the power/ease-of-use equation. Over the past six months a friend and I have installed about dozen different CMS systems, with most of those being PHP systems. Some of them are very good.

My favorite was Mambo — its one of thew few open source CMS’s that, with a number of additional modules, would come pretty close to duplicating the features I enjoy in Conversant. The problem is that Mambo and others are much more complex than Conversant. As I told Seth Dillingham, to exploit Conversant to its fullest, you just need to be able to think really logically in order to use Conversant’s macro system to produce whatever results you’re after. With, Mambo and these other systems, you really need to know a lot about PHP (or pay someone who does to help you) to do the sort of things you can easily accomplish on your own with Conversant.

For me, it is important to be able to make complex changes to my site myself, and to be able to do so quickly — I’d prefer to spend my time writing and editing rather than tinkering, and Conversant does an excellent job of providing a lot of power with a minimum of effort.

Anyway, earlier this month Macrobyte upgraded Conversant which resulted in nice speed increase and this week released a new, improved update to the macro processor, which will allow even more complex behaviors to be added (not to mention improving overall performance).

Sound interesting? Get a free personal Conversant site here and give it a whirl.

Stupid Fundie Atheists

Just like the fundamentalist and evangelical Christians, we atheists have to endure a lot of idiocy from self-righteous, idiots who call themselves atheists and make the rest of us look bad.

Fox News’ Brit Hume reports on one of these folks,

An effort to boost Christmas Tree recycling in Chicago has come under fire by atheists, who say it unfairly benefits Christians. Authorities planned to hand out a year’s worth of blue recycling bags in exchange for one used tree, but atheist activist Rob Sherman says the program is inherently unfair to those without Christmas trees.

Officials told him he could bring someone else’s tree but Sherman complained that “Atheists shouldn’t have to go begging from home to home for a Christian who will sponsor them.” The city will now offer the blue bags to anyone who visits a tree recycling location and brings a large bag of any recyclable material.

Ugh. Many of these atheists seem to exist pretty much to complain how much this or that public expression of religion is oppressing them.

Consider another horrible example of discrimination. Sherman takes credit for Wisconsin’s decision to remove “Happy Easter” displays from that state’s rest areas,

This past weekend, I drove through Wisconsin, primarily on Interstates 39 and 90. At several of the Interstate rest areas where I stopped, numerous signs and decorations had been erected which said, “Happy Easter.” Other signs, as many as one hundred per building, promoted Easter by depicting bunnies and eggs in a manner consistant with Easter decorations. I wasn’t happy about it. Can’t a guy go to the bathroom at a government facility without the government cramming the Christian religion down his throat?

Today, I contacted the Wisconsin Governor’s Office to express my concern about this state/church separation matter. I was referred to the Highway Department, which referred me to the Engineer in Charge of Roadside Facilities and Maintenance. The engineer took my call.

. . .

The engineer said that the rest stops are maintained by a sheltered workshop (an organization that provides work for mentally handicapped individuals), and that he understood my perspective. He said that he’d make some contacts and get back to me with a response and a decision by Thursday of this week.

Five minutes later, he called back. He said that he told management at the sheltered workshop that they could put up signs promoting the Spring season and Spring scenes, but that the Easter signs had to go.

Sherman is clearly proof of his own position — would a just God really tolerate such silliness?

When he’s not crusading against Christmas tree recycling programs or Happy Easter signs, Sherman worries about a number of issues, including the lack of legally enforceable clothing size standards.

Source:

Lost in Translation. Brit Hume, Fox News, December 29, 2004.

MobiPocket Version of Star Dragon

Boing! Boing! points to Mike Brotherton releasing his scifi novel Star Dragon under a Creative Commons license. Brotherton has text, RTF and HTML versions of the novel on his web site.

For those, like me, using MobiPocket Reader on a PDA, I’ve created a MobiPocket version of Star Dragon. Update: This can now be downloaded from Mike Brotherton’s site. The PRC file is located here.

Note: I’ll soon be removing the MobiPocket version of the novel, as the webmaster for Mike Brotherton’s site is going to add it there.

I have added, however, the cleaned-up HTML version of the noel that I used to create the MobiPocket version, which should help others wanting to convert the novel to other formats.

This differs from the HTML version currently on Brotherton’s site in that,

  • All of the non-breaking spaces have been removed
  • All open paragraph tags now have accompanying closed paragraph tags at the end of each paragraph
  • All of the HTML-encoded characters have been replaced with straight ASCII versions — i.e., I replaced all the HTML encoded single quotes with actual single quotes
  • Chapter and other headings are now center-aligned paragraphs and with opening and closing bold tags

You can download the cleaned-up version here.