Is Students for War a Parody?

I have not been able to figure out if Students for War is a subtle pardoy or if the people behind it really are sincerely insane. A WHOIS search turns up an essentially anonymous registration (registered to “Concerned Citizen.”)

If it’s really mean to be serious, a) again, they’re insane, and b) I’m not sure why I should listen to people who can’t even be bothered to correctly spell “Holocaust” on one of their nifty downloadable fliers. Normally correcting people’s spelling isn’t my thing, but the spelling in this case seems to be as sloppy as the thinking.

Ugandan Legislators Stage Walkout to Protest Lack of Action Against LRA

Voice of America reports that MPs representing the northern region of Uganda staged a walkout of parliament to protest the government’s inability to deal decisively with the Lord’s Resistance Army’s continuing violent incursions in that part of the country.

Lira district MP Margaret Ateng complained that after 16 years the Ugandan government still doesn’t seem to be able to stop the LRA from operating in northern Uganda,

But, to our surprise, no changes have come, changes meaning that there’s not been a stop to LRA incursions. Instead, it has worsened. We’ve seen that, whatever we’ve been mentioning, whatever we’ve been stating to be done, whatever advice we’ve given for things to improve has not been taken up.

Source:

Uganda parliament members protest continuing northern violence. Voice of America, November 24, 2003.

Group Fighting LRA Requests More Guns

Members of Parliament from Lango, Uganda, urged the government to supply more rifles to pro-government militias fighting the Lord’s Resistance Army in Lango. The LRA recently released letters promising to undertake widespread killings in Lango.

Kampala newspaper The Monitor quoted Lango member of parliament Omara Atubo as saying,

Imagine 2,000 people being given only 800 guns to fight! We appeal to government to give us more guns to counter the bigger threat the rebels pose now. As a result, many [fighters] have abandoned [the war] because they will definitely not fight with their bare hands.

According to The Monitor, the government has agreed to give guns to the Amuka Group, which is fighting the LRA in Lango, as well as the Arrow Group which is fighting the rebels in the Teso region.

Source:

Lango MPs Ask for Guns. The Monitor (Kampala), November 28, 2003.

LRA Troops Murder Nine Children in Lira District

The Mail and Guardian reports that earlier this week Lord’s Resistance Army troops murdered several children they had previously kidnapped in Uganda’s Lira district,

UgandaÂ’s LordÂ’s Resistance Army (LRA) rebels on Tuesday bludgeoned to death nine children they had earlier abducted as well as three others they found in a village in northern Uganda, army sources said.

This follows a week of incursions by the LRA in which more than 100 people were killed.

Source:

Children latest victims of LRA rebels. Mail and Guardian, November 24, 2003.

Nigeria to Crack Down on 419 Scammers?

Africa Online reports that Nigeria is creating a special government commission to crack down on 419 scammers.

Of course you have to remember that Nigeria is one of the largest oil exporting countries in the world, but it’s government has not been able to solve the country’s long-running gasoline shortages. So don’t expect to see much of a decline in 419 scam spam e-mails.

Source:

NIGERIA TO TACKLE INTERNET FRAUD CRIMES. Africa Online, November 28, 2003.

Congressional Idiots’ Hilarious IT Mishaps

Okay, so the mini-scandal of the week was the revelation that a person apparently part of Republican Orrin Hatch’s staff managed to access a Congressional server that contained drafts of memos by Democrats. The person in question then posted some of those memos on the Internet and/or leaked them to media people.

How could this happen? Because, in part, the Senate has what is bar none the dumbest way of handling its IT needs of any organization I have ever heard of. According to a Washington Times story on the leak investigation (emphasis added),

Republicans blamed the security problem on a glitch dating to May 2001, when Sen. James M. Jeffords of Virginia left the Republican Party to become an independent, giving Democrats control over the Senate and Judiciary Committee. When that happened, control over the Judiciary Committe servers also switched hands and new computer technicians unfamiliar with the system were hired.

How stupid could an organization be that it would arbitrarily recycle its IT staff for mission-critical infrastucture in this manner? Are people in the Senate really this stupid?

Wouldn’t the obvious solution be to place Senate IT duties with some non-partisan group that remains stable regardless of the vagaries of each election or party defection?

Stupid beyond words.

Source:

Senate GOP backs leak investigation. Charles Hurt, Washington Times, November 25, 2003.

An Example of the Flexibility of Conversant’s Metadata Tools

One of the reasons I and others swear by Conversant to manage our web sites it that 90 percent of the time if I think of a really cool feature I’d like to have, I can create it myself without having to know any programming or having to hope enough other people want it to make it worth the developer’s time to code it.

For example, here’s a problem I run into repeatedly. Whenever I write an article I usually list all of the sources I used for the article at the very end. The problem is that more often than not those particular articles are 404 even just a month after I’ve posted. If I want to go back and reference those articles again, I have to hope their in Google’s cache or that somebody else might have a copy.

So it hit me the other day that the obvious way to prevent this problem in the future would be to simply store copies of any articles used as sources along with the article itself. That took me about 15 minutes to set up.

First, I created a custom field called “Sources_Full_Text.” This created a basic text field that is assigned to every post included in the database.

Second, I modified the message editing template so that administrators (i.e. me) now have an additional text entry box called “Sources.” All I have to do is copy and paste the text of source articles into there.

Third, I don’t want to get into legal trouble by giving everyone access to this material — this is really only for my later potential use. So, I used a conditional macro that checks to see a) does a particular article have anything in the sources_full_text field and b) if so, is the person viewing the article and administrator. If both of those are true, then there is a link added at the very bottom of the article to a page that will display the text included in that field.

Total time to add this feature: about 15 minutes.

Total additional cost: $0

Never having to worry about those articles going 404 again: priceless.

The More Metadata, The Merrier

Macrobyte recently added a few features to Conversant (the CMS/groupware system that drives this web site) that I had requested. The one that made the biggest difference on this site was an additional field of metadata for directories.

A brief re-cap here: everything on this site is saved as an entry in a database. Various macros are then used to build page templates and manipulate the various entries six-ways-to-Sunday. Each page on this site has a number of user-created metadata fields as well as some system-specific metadata, including a Navigation Title and Page Title (i.e., so you could sort on the Navigation Title but display the Page Title). Unfortunately, directories only had the Navigation Title.

That was a problem on this site, because I ended up with directories that I wanted to sort in one way but display in another. For example, this list of Wizard of Oz books on this site should sort “The Wizard of Oz” as “Wizard of Oz, The”. Before, it could not do that. Now it handles it just fine. Now, my complete site map is a thing of beauty.

I also should add that I am constantly amazed at the ease-of-use of Conversant’s redirect feature. As other recent discussions about creating a taxonomy for weblogs have noted, coming up with a taxonomy is an enormous undertaking, and I tend to organize mine haphazardly. The ability to move an entire directory and then redirect the old pages to the new ones quickly and easily is extraordinarily helpful. This way I can change and revise my categories anytime I please without worrying about creating lots of 404 errors for users.

Why Not Go All the Way on Reimportation of Drugs?

The debate over allowing Americans to import drugs from Canada — where they are generally cheaper — is fascinating if only to watch free trade Republicans come out in favor of protectionism and protectionist Democrats suddenly find the free trade religion.

I agree with those who believe Americans should be able to buy imported drugs from practically anywhere. If you can get your medication in Mexico or Canada cheaper than in the United States, go for it.

The main argument against this is that drug companies in Canada, for example, are forced to charge lower prices by the government there. Without higher drug prices in the United States, there won’t be enough money for future research and development.

This argument has some appeal, but frankly this is a problem the drug companies themselves are going to solve. Look, the basic problem is that drugs in Canada are far too cheap. Rather than challenge Canada’s ridiculous formulary pricing, drug companies just cave and pass on the costs of doing so to Americans. Screw that. Hopefully, allowing importation of prescription drugs will give the drug companies some backbone in such countries.

The other argument against reimportation of prescription drugs is, in my opinion, a red herring — that such drugs may be unsafe by American standards. Certainly those who favor reimportation dismiss such arguments as simply industry-serving nonsense.

But why not go all the way with this? Why not let American firms adopt manufacturing standards that are acceptable in Canada (or Mexico for that matter)? Why not let Americans import drugs from Canada (or other countries) that have yet to be approved by the FDA?

If it’s good enough for Canadians, it’s good enough for Americans, right?

Survival Rates in the British NHS vs. U.S. Hospitals

There is some support in the United States for “solving” America’s health care problems with a state-run health system like Canada and European countries have. Fortunately, although there might be a lot of support for a generic health care system like this, such support tends to vanish when people start seeing the details (e.g. HillaryCare).

British paper The Telegraph had a story back in September about a study comparing the performance of the UK’s National Health Service with that of the United State’s mishmash of private, semi-private and public system of hospitals. The difference was quite striking,

Patients who have major operations on the National Health Service are four times more likely to die than Americans undergoing such surgery, according to a new study.

. . .

The results showed that just under 10 per cent of the British patients [in the study] died in hospital after major surgery, compared with 2.5 per cent of the American patients.

What would explain such a high difference in mortality? Are British surgeons and nurses less competent than Americans? Do Americans use technologies that the British don’t have access to?

Part of the difference in mortality rates is explained by a feature of most nationalized health care systems — the increased waiting period from diagnosis to surgery.

The joint study, carried out by University College London and a team from Columbia University in New York, found that patients in Britain who were most at risk of complications after major surgery were not being seen by specialists and were not reaching intensive care units in time too save them.

The other part is due to cost-cutting measures in Great Britain when it comes to post-op care. Quite simply, in the United States someone undergoing such an operation would be treated in post-op by another surgeon and an anesthesiologist, typically in a critical care unit.

Prof [Monty] Mythen . . . said: “In The Manhattan hospital, the care after surgery is delivered largely by a consultant surgeon and an anesthetist. We know from other research that more than one third of those who die after a major operation in Britain are not seen by a similar consultant.

“In America, everyone would go into a critical care bed — they go into a highly monitored environment. That doesn’t happen routinely in the UK.”

Which brings up my other pet peeve about nationalized health plans proposed for the United States. Advocates of such plans frequently blast HMOs for interfering with the doctor-patient relationship by dictating what doctors can and cannot offer their patients. But a nationalized health system would simply substitute a single entity — the federal health agency — for the various HMOs. Call it the mother of all HMOs.

The trend in countries that have nationalized health care is not some utopian health care system where doctors get to treat patients regardless of cost. Rather it is a system where health care is explicitly rationed by state and/or national health care agencies and health care decisions are completely subsumed to the need to control costs.

Source:

US surgery safer than under NHS. Thair Shaikh, Telegraph (UK), September 7, 2003.