Only Vote for Three?

Over the past few months, I’ve occasionally posted photographs of anti-war protests held in downtown Kalamazoo every Tuesday and Sunday. Those protests are sponsored by a local group called Kalamazoo Non-violent Opponents of War. The group was formed to protest the war on Iraq but their politics go into a wide range of left wing causes and issues.

For example, their web site endorses three left wing candidates for the seven-seat city commission: Don Cooney, David Juarez and Elizabeth Forest, which certainly helps me figure out better who not to vote for (not that I usually vote anyway, but should I have nothing better to do next Tuesday . . .)

Here’s how the city commission election works around here. There are only seven seats and they are all up for re-election. Anybody registered votes for up to seven of the candidates listed on the ballot, and at the end of the day the top seven candidates win. The person with the most total votes is also the mayor.

What is interesting about KNOW’s endorsement is that they are not only recommending that people vote for these three candidates but they are recommending that people vote only for those three candidates. According to KNOW,

Please note that although you are ABLE to vote for SEVEN candidates, you are NOT OBLIGED TO. If you vote for a full slate of seven candidates, YOU ARE
DILUTING YOUR VOTES FOR DON, DAVID, AND ELIZABETH. Let’s do all we can to re-elect Don Cooney and to insure that he will no longer be so often a lonely dissenter in his votes and his support for the poor and the voiceless, and for the way of peace and non-violence. Our recommendation: VOTE FOR THREE, AND LET IT BE!

Of course there’s nothing inappropriate going on here and KNOW can advocate any sort of voting strategy it likes, but it’s a bit odd to see a group dedicated to a rather radical version of democracy on the other hand tell its members that voting on the other four commission seats is a Bad Idea(TM).

Plus this is exactly the sort of strategy that usually gets criticized in left-liberal publications when it has been used, say, to elect anti-abortion candidates to local office so they can use their position as a platform for their views.

I’m kind of mixed about the election itself. On the one hand, Kalamazoo has had a lot of economic problems and the election of these three would likely signal to businesses that are fleeing the city that they might want to move out even faster. On the other hand I’d like to buy a house in this area and that would further depress home values, so it’s really a wash there.

Fired City Manager Taught Classes With False Credentials

This ClickOnDetroit.Com article had me laughing out loud. Sterling Heights, Michigan, recently fired City Manager Steve Duchane because he had repeatedly lied about has academic credentials — basically he lied about receiving degrees from various institutions.

Interestingly, he also lied about his degrees on his application to Oakland University where he taught a class thre years ago. The topic of that class? Ethics.

Wren’s Nest — Excellent Wiccan News Blog

Like everything else religious, I am equally repulsed and fascinated by all things Wicca. My wife recently pointed me to Wren’s Nest which is basically a blog devoted to highlighting news stories related to Wicca.

For example, I didn’t see anyone else link to this story that the ASPCA a couple years ago finally dropped its nonsensical recommendation that animal shelters not allow adoption of black cats around Halloween, and that shelters around the country are starting to get the message and drop such bans. As the article notes, not only are there no statistics backing up claims that people would adopt black cats just to torture or kill them for God(dess)-knows-what, if you want to find a black cat it’s not that hard to find one on the streets in most parts of the country.

My Podzilla Arrives

The other day on E-Bay, I saw a pretty good deal for a Roadwired Podzilla bag to go along with the Roadwired MegaMedia Computer Bag I bought a few months ago and couldn’t resist. It arrived a few days ago and, just like the Media Bag, is simply a gadget freak’s dream come true.

The Podzilla was actually even smaller than I thought it would be — significantly smaller than the smallish camera bag I had been using — but once you open all the pockets, etc. it’s just amazing how much you can cram in a 9.25″ X 9″ X 6.5″ bag.

The other day I took it along with me on a business trip. I was easily able to bring along in this single bag my digital camera, digital camcorder, PDA, cellphone, GameBoy Advance SP, batteries, blank mini-DV tapes, half a dozen flash memory cards of various flavors, and still had a few empty pockets.

Gun Crazy Great Britain?

I absolutely love the headline on this story from The Observer from October 5,

Police fear they are losing control of gun-crazy Britain

Now wait a minute — starting in 1998 Great Britain banned the private ownership of handguns and forced everyone who had registered a handgun to turn their weapons over to the state.

And yet, according to The Observer, gun crime has doubled since the Labour Party came to power.

Apparently, as best I can tell, criminals aren’t abiding by the law and are obtaining weapons illegally — imagine that. The nerve of some people.

Not to worry, though, the government apparently has a plan. They’re talking about mandatory minimums for illegal possession of a gun. I’m sure that will accomplish what the ban on guns hasn’t.

Source:

Police fear they are losing control of gun-crazy Britain. Tony Thompson, The Observer, October 5, 2003.

A Very Scary Solstice

Okay, everybody loves Christmas, and what goes better with Christmas than H.P. Lovecraft? Nothing, of course, which is why the A Very Scary Solstice is a must have for the coming holiday season.

This contains classics like “I Saw Mommy Kissing Yog-Shothoth” and Awake Ye Scary Great Old Ones (MP3).

Yeah, it’s $20 but they throw in a Singalong Songbook that includes tidbits on the stories behind these classic Holiday hits.

I think I’m going to buy this to play at my office to see if anyone notices.

The State of Laptop Alternatives

Over the past couple years I’ve written several pieces and a few reviews of laptop alternatives — essentially portable keyboards with small LCD displays, memory and USB/serial ports such as the AlphaSmart 3000. I haven’t written anything in awhile about such devices, however, and I get a surprising amount of e-mail asking for information/opinions about the current set of laptop alternatives.

First, I should make it clear that I no longer use any of the laptop alternatives I’ve used in the past — I’ve got my Alphasmart and Quickpad boxed up somewhere in the basement. They both certainly did what their respective manufacturers advertised, but at some point what was lost in not having a laptop was just not worth it for me anymore. Part of the problem is the form factor — you still need a keyboard-sized bag or backpack to carry these things around in. So if I’m going to be carrying around a bag that size, why not throw a laptop in it anyway?

I would have used these more if I had an application where a) weight and b) battery life were serious issues. If I were a student spending 6 hours on campus, for example, I would have found the laptop alternatives much more useful.

As for products out there today, I know a number of people who swear by their Alphasmart Dana which uses the Palm OS (and there’s even an 802.11b version at a slight premium). It certainly is a creative solution to some of the limitations of the Alphasmart 3000.

To be honest, though, I’d just go with a PDA-oriented solution. The Dana Wireless is $429. You can buy a very nice PDA for that price and add a portable keyboard. Yes the screen size is smaller, but for my money that is more than offset by the bright color LCDs of today’s PDAs as opposed to the monochrome screen you’re stuck with on something like the Dana.

Respecting the Dignity of Those You Fundamentally Disagree With

Something that continues to amaze and annoy me is how wrapped up some people can get in their ideological wars that they completley jettison any sort of common decency and dignity toward others. Yes, I can enjoy (or start) a flamewar as much as the next guy or gal, but some people seem unable to take even a step back even in the most extreme positions.

What I’m talking about is Pamela Anderson. Now I am not a big fan of Anderson’s — to put it bluntly, aside from everything else I’ve just never thought she was that attractive. Add in the lack of acting ability, extraodinarily poor choice in boyfriends/husbands, etc. and I’m just not sure how this woman ever became a household name of sorts (and no, I don’t think the obvious answer that everyone’s going to suggest explains it either).

Anyway, I normally wouldn’t write anything about Anderson except that she is an animal rights activist and an occasional spokesperson for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. I, to say the least, have a fundamental disagreement with animal rights ideologies, and the few times I’ve ever written anything about Anderson has been about her animal rights activism.

Anderson is also afflicted with Hepatitis-C and fears that the disease may killer her within a decade. Anderson is an idiot for following some herbal regimen instead of interferon treatment, and it’s annoying that she fronts for a group that is opposed to ongoing research with mice and chimpanzees that may one day lead to more effective treatments or even a cure for the 175 million Hepatitis-C sufferers worldwide.

But it’s bizarre to see some folks on mailing lists I subscribe to practically gloat over the news that she may die within ten years. (Actually, it’s rather sickening.)

If Anderson dies from Hepatitis-C that would be a tragedy, just as the 8,000-10,000 annual deaths from the disease in the United States alone is a tragedy (and, sadly, that number is likely to triple over the next 20 years if a better treatment isn’t discovered).

I just don’t understand the sort of person who could gloat over Anderson’s potentially fatal medical problems.